Search results for query: *

Great analogy btw with them both being fantasies. I wonder when Caro will break the Incest story...

Yeah cause that's the medias MO when it comes to Essendon and controversy, just let it slide :rolleyes: There is a very good reason it isn't mentioned but it doesn't suit the Masses agenda.

But of course you would never be involved in a doping case determination so that is completely irrelevent. It is so amazing that some still think that WADA will bring forth new charges. I shouldn't be amazed but i still am.

Actually the reason the photo is funny is because it used to get posted (and there are even still posters with it as their avatar) to troll Essendon when Knights was coach, some of which were actually Richmond supporters. Of course back then he was just a shit coach, from an unsuccessful club...

What are these falsehoods? No that is not all you have said at all. You are running an agenda here only producing figures that suit your argument. Your argument is based on Knights being a former Richmond player and in your opinion he was poorly treated (Which i agree with to a small extent)...

You only look at it through your view point rather than hard cold facts. Poor Knights had people undermining him, yet Hird gets no concession points for 3 years of the shit we are going through. You talk about points scored (In a team that had Lloyd, Lucas and Williams who Knights personally...

Knights was sacked because he refused to implement a defensive game plan. His demise was bought about prematurely by Hird however.

You are creating a Hird thread at the epicenter of Hird hatred. You know exactly how it will go...

I wasn't really talking about your posts as they are more balanced and while i don't totally agree with all your points there is an argument that could be made to back them up. However wtf names Armfield, White, Wood and Curnow as "Young improving talent"... As for my team, i've had the same...

Barker has certainly got the delusion levels at fever pitch amongst the bretheren on BF.

1 w0uld h4v3 3v3ry pl4y3r 1n th3 l34gu3 b3f0r3 H0g4n.

OP starting to challenge Kings Army for Essendon obsession. Just last year West Coast were said to have one of the worst midfields in the league... This year Port Adelaide were locks for top 4 and many had them penciled in for the GF...

Yet he played 19 games last year, 18 of which were with Newman in the same team... Who you think offers more is irrelevant as Hardwick picks the team and every week he picks Newman.

What is this obsession Tiger supporters have with saying newman isn't in your best 22 so you can reduce your ave age? He played 18 games last year, he played 5 of the first 6 this year, got injured and after 1 VFL game is straight back into the seniors. He is best 22 pure and simple...

You don't recruit players from other clubs and cut them 1 year into their 2 year contracts, at least not if you want to draft any players from other clubs ever again. Melk isn't a down hill skier and some of his best performances have actually been in losing sides he is just a limited...

And his manager would have told him to stay at the Dogs.

Where is all this evidence of teams bottoming out and then winning flags? Of course you have to be up there to win one but that's not guaranteed either and some clubs just don't win flags and haven't decade after decade and yet some clubs just do and have don so for decades. If Cooney, Gwilt...

?

The answer is there if you open your other eye. I'll admit he's been no Jones or Tutt but my reply had nothing to do with form of course.

8 Today with the rest of the year to go. Of course once you predicted he wouldn't, then nothing was surer than he would...

:cool:

Zerrett

You would have to think he would be the least experienced but that's just a guess on my part. I think he should make the squad at least but it will be tough to actually make the side as there are several top candidates all in for the same position/s and imo they tend to favour those that have...

Actually it was forced on them by the Players Association.

This has been quite prevelant this year and like with all teams if you do turn it over you are screwed. To me from the outside it just seems that it's all go go go with Port but if they can't do that, then they play like they are lost. Also they have a couple of lower skilled backman that look...

Or did they just catch the rest of the comp off guard? I agree he deserves the chance to turn it around. I can't remember the exact numbers but it was something like they have lost 14 of their last 20 games or something quite damning anyways.

Extending Hinkleys contract might have been a bad move and very premature.

I think he will be a very good player and you are just another Carlton poster using an alias. Back to the HTB for you... Edit: When you posted this thread your team was Port Adelaide yet now it's Richmond. Man up and change it to your real team Carlton :cool:

It's the reunion of a premiership side that Hird didn't even ****ing play in. You are a broken record.

Think, then post.