Search results for query: *

Before I vanish: **** the Pies. **** arsey goals. **** the umpires. Watch Geelong crush them by 10 goals since this will be their only good game for the year.

I have taken time from social media. I have returned just to say: we was robbed.

Okay just so we don't get no claims of hiding I'll be off Bigfooty for several days. Unlike you lot I have actually been working fulltime (plus overtime) the last few weeks and now I actually have some free time off. Last thing I want to do is waste it you clowns so I'm outta here. Seeya in a...

I am just asking if you think is such a menace that you would be willing to entertain options that you normally wouldn't to discredit him? I mean you already shown two cases where you have embraced theories of questionable value simply because they were anti Trump. Have you ever done that...

Hearing today with great fanfare that Oxford University is starting their human trial for a very promising vaccine candidate. Estimated study completition: at least one year. Errr.

And against such evil sometimes we need to taken more...extreme methods?

Actually I think Stephan Miller is the only speechwriter Trump has. Its not a good look that it needs a clarification true. Its also not a good look to ignore that clarification because it does not suit you.

In the link I had you can see the follow up question to the doctor (that is shown in your twitter link) and Trump is right next to him and you can hear his words yourself.

Plenty of leftist talking points you seem to like. Weren't you parroting that point that Trump had a financial interest in Hydroxychloroquine? Only for it turn out to a meaningless indirect amount? Then there was the Trump was getting his ideas from Foxnews in that LWT segment which also...

So I take it you couldn't actually find anything wrong with the text your main issue was with the URL?

You seem upset. I take it all the typos and random punctuation is from you furiously tapping away on your mobile phone right? Hope to God this isn't you typing on a desktop. But in response you laughably emotional diatribe: Nah bro.

Well why take a selective quote when my link has the entire question and answer and follow up statements? Why do you let the media filter you?

Well suffice to say I disagree with you. I didn't take it as advocacy of that at all. But then I watch his follow up statements too. No I don't assume everyone is against Trump is a leftie. I take you as leftie because you espouse leftie viewpoints.

Do you honestly think Trump was advocating for the direct injection of disinfectant into the human body? I think we both know the answer to that. Yet here is 2+ pages where a big play it put on where the usual suspects all pretend they believe he did. Why? Then you come in the with cherry on...

Thats your agenda eh? What have you done that justifies the incredibly inflated opinion of yourself? The left in a nutshell.

Whatever. Its pretty damn obvious he did not mean to inject disinfectant into your body. But hey continue with your agenda its working great for you.

Run away little doggie! Always been your way coward pure cheap shot merchant.

You are deliberately promoting a falsehood for a political agenda. I post a second video clarly explaining it and you ignore it because it shows up as a liar. Wow. Quick post a simpson's gif!

And a direct quote clearly clarifying exactly what he meant when the reporter asked is not one either. But you DELIBERATELY ignore that to push an agenda. How pathetic are you?

And the clarifying video later? Or are you going to continue your falsehood?

So where is your reply coward? Or are you going to scuttle off when the questions get too hard again? Better post the gif again quick!

Well what has everyone one so excited? The pop up sprinklers have come in for some cheap shot including chief coward Dazzler. Oh I see a quote taken out of context. Where have I seen this before? He was not infact talking about literally injecting patients of disinfectant. His use of the word...

Yeah I know. I approve of the current course. I was originally replying to the idea of elimination. To me elimination does not solve anything its just a delaying tactic.

You have to understand I was replying to a poster who supported an elimination stategy (ie bunker up till next year). I am happy with the current approach. There has to be balanced. I like to keep politics seperate since I know it can get quite heated and disruptive so I leave it there.

Continue the supression strategy but move toward limited reopening in the next few months while still isolating high risk people. A slow graduated opening watching for possible outbreaks.

Wow 2 posts about something I didn't say. Nice strawman. No I mentioned nothing about herd immunity or business as usual. Don't know why you have to lie. My point was there are downsides to the 'elimination' strategy that may well be worse then the 'supression' one. It is not the perfect no...

You don't realise is the economy is people's lives too. Have a look at mortality rates during financial downturns. Deaths from mental health, homelessness and poverty all spike.

Still trying for the Disney ending I see. We can neither prevent all deaths nor ensure everything goes back to normal. More Australians will die of that is certain and this will not go back to normal unlike the rest of the world (or at least our major trading partners and allies) go back to normal.

Was expecting this question. Who wants to sacrifice their family? No one of course. But is exporting the suffering to others to save yourself the grief better? Sometimes there is no right answer but simply the least worst. Not taking that option because you are too afraid of hurting anyone...

Sadly I think far more people are going to die from the economic fallout of the virus then the virus itself. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/economic-downturn-excess-cancer-deaths-atun/ Harvard study of the Economic downturn linked it to 260k deaths from lack of medical...