The good news is that WB's who have a great recruiting team were hoping like hell that Talia would slip to 15.
So its WB and Adel v Port and Melb.
Id back WB and Adel recruiting. Its just amazing the difference in opinions by the so called 'experts', who watch these guys weekly over a 2 year period.
Hmmm, lets play spot the difference.
Whats the difference between the Western Bulldogs/Crows and Port/Melbourne?
I wouldn't be particularly worried about two clubs coming out and saying they didn't rate a certain player, when another did. Just look at Dangerfield and Otten for that matter, we rated them a lot higher than others clubs did, were we wrong to do so? The next year we got McKernan at 28 when we rated him at about 6, so far he's shown us that he was certainly worth far more than a late 2nd rounder.
I think here on BigFooty, we tend to get caught up in the groupthink phenomenon, which in this case assumes that there's some master list ranking these players and that because everyone on on BF, with their phantom drafts, follows pretty much the same order that the clubs will do the same, with lists that only vary slightly from one another. When in actual fact, the clubs quite often have quite differing lists. This is how in 07 we managed to get our 3rd, 11th and 12th rated players with picks 10, 27 and 30 and in 08 we managed to get our 2nd and 6th(?) rated players with picks 10 and 28.
It just shows how much of an inexact science drafting is, there's really little point worrying how well or badly we've done in this most recent draft, because we won't seriously know for 2 or 3 years, at the very least, how well we've done. Everyone thinks they've done well at the moment, that's why drafting is often likened to Christmas for Footy clubs, but the proof will be in the pudding, which unforunately isn't delivered on Christmas day.