Player Watch #13: Darcy Tucker

[The Nostradamus]

Much rather him than bailey butcher Scott as an alternative

Goes in hard at least

 

[Mute Point]

How many more years is he contracted?

 

[Twangler]

Much rather him than bailey butcher Scott as an alternative

Goes in hard at least

They were both as bad as each other today. Couldn’t possibly split them.

 

[William Caresser]

The more he touches the ball, the worse it is for the side. Absolutely sick of this guy getting a game. He has zero awareness of what's around him, he is so slow to decide what to do with the ball and so slow to actually dispose of it. He either gets caught or turns it over or picks up cheap kicks.

The worst 23 possession game ever played.

 

[shintemaster]

Much rather him than bailey butcher Scott as an alternative

Goes in hard at least

Goes in hard...

Right, anyway, I'd rather he wasn't running around for us unless it is a requirement in Logue's contract that Tucker also gets games. Nothing disposal, too slow in the head, misses easy shots, just slows play for us and doesn't offer enough physically to make up for it.

 

[Devington]

Tagger. IDK. Wing isn't working.

 

[Twangler]

Tagger. IDK. Wing isn't working.

Could be a perfect role for him. Has a tank and is quite physical and no other attributes of note. We could have just sent him in to negate Martin

 

[Devil Fish]

**** on a bull

 

[amaz199]

His worst game for us I reckon. It was that bad. So many bad turnovers.

Just put someone else on the wing Clarko.

 

[muttley45]

Tackles in F50, 1 each to Sleevo and Pink, speaks volumes for the easy transition out of there for oppo

 

[Spud11]

Make him a tagger or no spot

 

[ChairmanZia]

Cut him, see if we can get parker in, that would be a huge coup if we can.

 

[DuckYeah]

Cut him, see if we can get parker in, that would be a huge coup if we can.

Would only want parker if he was committed to be a leader.

 

[ChairmanZia]

Would only want parker if he was committed to be a leader.

Not necessary, i want parker to come over more as the nick dal santo type, i.e. a senior player who can hold his own to faciliate the high end youngsters around him to flourish.

 

[Chadwiko]

Probably his best game for the year?

 

[DocSholl]

I assume he had 30 and it was possibly the most nothing 30 ever. Just nothingness.

 

[The Nostradamus]

Found his role

Looked good back there and combined well with fish

 

[Ischenko]

Week is a long time in footy.

 

[Ischenko]

I assume he had 30 and it was possibly the most nothing 30 ever. Just nothingness.

Shit post tbh. Close to our best. He played really well.

 

[DocSholl]

s**t post tbh. Close to our best. He played really well.

He definitely got a lot of the ball in defensive 50

 

[roos_fanatic08]

I reckon if you dropped a footy from the top of the Rialto tower it would reach your foot quicker than Darcy Tuckers ball drop.

 

[shintemaster]

Found his role

Looked good back there and combined well with fish

What role is that pray tell?

That was his best game for the year IMO, but it made little positive difference to the result.

 

[bennymate]

Ineffectual seagull

 

[William Caresser]

He definitely got a lot of the ball in defensive 50

Has learnt how to rack them up unfortunately with 7 turnovers deep in defence.

 

[Roosurgence]

Found his role

Looked good back there and combined well with fish

He’s shit!

Problem is there are more players on the list that are worse.