_RT_
Community Leader
- Sep 17, 2006
- 46,920
- 90,843
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Furies Premiers 2010
- Moderator
- #3,851
The difference between us and the Hawks is they had a pretty good lineup already and Rioli was scene as a final piece to give them that dynamic difference. As I've mentioned we have a pretty good dynamic group but our blue collar group, IMO, is lacking. While we have the likes of Grigg, Tuck, Conca, Houli, Newman and Ellis who are a solid group after that it falls away a bit. Get more quality in to make that group better and the dynamic guys will be much better placed to perform at their match winning best.We'll have to agree to disagree here RT.
I'll just give you one example of what I mean. Hawthorn in 2007 selected Rioli at around number 12. At that point there were a number of "safer" but more boring options. Their risk taking paid dividends. They won the premiership the next year and although he did not do it single handedly, he certainly contributed greatly to the cause. I doubt they would have won it without him although we can argue here.
My point is exactly that. In a game of football you rarely win the big games unless your team takes risks. Playing safe doesn't bring the ultimate success. I feel drafting is the same. I'm talking of calculated risks though, not speculative. Guys like Kennedy, Simpson and Garlett are all top rated players and are unlikely to bomb out. But their upside, like Rioli or Jetta is huge. Their presence and ability to do things others cannot often are game changing on the biggest stage of all. After all I want to win the premiership not just sneak into the eight. These safer X factor types are more likely to do that. Guys like Vlastuin may not. It's a matter of opinion of course.