2012 Player X v Player Y

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Player X v Player Y

I would think Orren would have more game time than Longer, but would depend on how the Lions use Longer and L'Berger - will Longer be named as a sub and replace L'Berger part way through the game, or will they go down the Cox and NicNat path and have them rotate through the forward line.


A.Hall or T.Dickson for a forward bench spot?

I'm going with Hall, I think he'll have better JS in a younger Suns team. That said...

Porplyzia, Duffield and Chapman

or

Dickson, Broughton and Stevie J
 
Re: Player X v Player Y

Need 2 of Smedts, Couch and Morris.

Which 2???? I'm leaning Morris and Smedts.

Your lean is correct.


Lake, M Murphy, Porplyzia

or

Goddard, Clay Smith, Zaharakis/Robinson (also - Zaharakis or Robinson)?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Re: Player X v Player Y

I'm going with Hall, I think he'll have better JS in a younger Suns team. That said...

Porplyzia, Duffield and Chapman

or

Dickson, Broughton and Stevie J

Dickson < Porplyzia
Broughton > Duffield
Stevie J > Chapman

2-1. So Option 2

-----------------------

Magner v C.Smith? Already pretty set on Magner, but just need another opinion.
 
Re: Player X v Player Y

Dickson < Porplyzia
Broughton > Duffield
Stevie J > Chapman

2-1. So Option 2

-----------------------

Magner v C.Smith? Already pretty set on Magner, but just need another opinion.

Magner the magnet

Marty Clarke and Tom Lynch

Or

Mitch Golby and Pfeiffer (worried about sub for Pfeiffer)
 
Re: Player X v Player Y

^ Clay Smith and Morris ... Don't really like Smith though.

--

Steve Johnson or Paul Chapman? (Or Pavlich, Robinson, Zaharakis, Lewis etc)

Also opted for Redden over other star mids like Rockliff, Mitchell etc. Shouldn't be too much difference between them I would have thought?
 
Re: Player X v Player Y

Lake, Murphy, Porp

I have it as Lake (70), Murphy (110), Porp (70)

Goddard (100), Smith (60), Zaharakis (90).

Possibly more from smith and lake.

Can't decide though. It'd midpricer or rookies really.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Re: Player X v Player Y

Swan + Dangerfield

OR

Watson + Chapman?

Swan and Danger, IMO. Danger will become a keeper this year, I'm backing him - Sando likes toughnuts, and Danger's definitely one of those. He'll play in the guts.
 
Re: Player X v Player Y

Steve Johnson or Paul Chapman? (Or Pavlich, Robinson, Zaharakis, Lewis etc)

Also opted for Redden over other star mids like Rockliff, Mitchell etc. Shouldn't be too much difference between them I would have thought?
 
Re: Player X v Player Y

Murphy instead of Boyd to avoid 4 of the same bye round players in midfield?


Kreuzer, Mccarthy, Lake, Porplyzia

or

Cox, Smith, Goddard, Smedts

There it is - midpricer vs rookie strategy. Thoughts?
 
Re: Player X v Player Y

Replacement for Gray? I don't want Dangerfield, already have Porps.

Don't know why Gray wasn't named either, ugh. Has to be someone cheaper.
 
Re: Player X v Player Y

Replacement for Gray? I don't want Dangerfield, already have Porps.

Don't know why Gray wasn't named either, ugh. Has to be someone cheaper.

Go with Danger, new coach who will give him more time in the midfield.

If your still against Danger, go down to a rookie and upgrade elsewhere.
 
Re: Player X v Player Y

That's a hard price in that position to get someone at. Theres a few decent ones more expensive but since it has to be cheaper most guys in that range are guys that you'll seriously be taking a big punt on - like Hurley or Ballantyne. I'd go with one of them but its a big risk.

Anyway,

Goddard + Rockliff vs Broughton + Pendles
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top