chapman or bartel
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
2013 Player/s X versus Y
- Thread starter Super Hans
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
- Feb 11, 2009
- 28,079
- 35,083
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- #rompingwins
Do you want 105? Lock in Bartel. Do you want the risk of a sub-100 score but the reward of 140? Go Chapman. FWIW I have them both.
I currently have Franklin and Bartel. I am going to keep Franklin so the choice with the rolling lockout has left me with Bartel or Chappy. I also said to myself I will take the advice of the 1st person who responded. But you have thrown it back at me. LOL.
Make a choice for me please.
Done deal manboob. No apologies will be needed. I like the idea of Chappy kicking 3 or 4 playing out of the middle. Thanks mate.
Embleberry
All Australian
- Sep 5, 2012
- 690
- 346
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Ruffy or Chappy or Bartel?? I have Blicavs as R2 and Cox in fwds so don't necessarily need Ruffy for the switcheroo!
I think quite a few of us are in this predicament
I think quite a few of us are in this predicament
- Mar 28, 2012
- 2,219
- 3,609
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Pittsburgh Steelers Perth Scorchers
Have the exact same setup with Blicavs R2 and Cox up Fwd. I'd go Roughy or bartel out of the three, i think Chappy will be on the decline. Roughy can get you points around the ground and with hitouts as ruck but Bartel looked good over pre season and the FWD link makes him look tasty.Ruffy or Chappy or Bartel?? I have Blicavs as R2 and Cox in fwds so don't necessarily need Ruffy for the switcheroo!
I think quite a few of us are in this predicament
.......I'd go....bartel...Slightly cheaper and can still find the footy aswell as sneak a couple goals
- Apr 30, 2010
- 5,562
- 4,521
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- MUFC, Golden State Warriors
Fyfe might rip the Bulldogs anus this week. Perfect guy to have in your team with 80-100k in the cap to turn to a Swan like player at round 6 or 7.
tracygrimshaw
All Australian
- Mar 18, 2013
- 640
- 343
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Harlett the safer option if he stays fit..
Watts vs Kennedy +160k
Watts vs Kennedy +160k
swansfan51
Brownlow Medallist
- Jun 3, 2007
- 12,602
- 21,357
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- The Exers
Kennedy even without the 160k
- Apr 30, 2010
- 5,562
- 4,521
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- MUFC, Golden State Warriors
Keep both till round 2 and look at break even scores? If I had the two and they were averaging similar I would keep Bennell longer because of the injury history of Fyfe and look for an opportunistic sideways or upgrade of Fyfe after several rounds. In a head to head I would back Fyfe for a higher average by years end but would not be surprised at a further Bennell breakout.
toxic
Premium Gold
yes bennell is a POD (pretty ordinary Decision) IMHO of course.
Easy - keep Fyfe - showed all the signs of class last week against a much tougher opponent than he has this week,
guess it depends on who you are bringing in tho
MightyMark
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 18, 2010
- 5,742
- 3,088
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Golden State Warriors, NE Patriots
Im still going to say Watts.
His performance was dismal on the weekend, but you have to expect him and Melbourne to bounce back some what, show a little fight.
toxic
Premium Gold
curious as to what you saw that gives you hope?? Freo up and flying - keen hungry etc, suban in a new role, looks incredibly fit and would be about 7th choice for an opposition to try and tag, Watts in a side that would struggle in the VFL, looking incredibly disinterested and surrounded by others who seemingly don't care either. Whilst i do expect melb to improve (god knows they cannot go backwards any further) i still dont see watts outscoring Suban, plus you get a lazy 160K in the bank
jakeystringer
Rookie
How crazy would I have to be if I end up doing this trade
Shaw ----> Suban
watts ----> rioli
and an added 200k in the bank to be able to get gaz later on
Shaw ----> Suban
watts ----> rioli
and an added 200k in the bank to be able to get gaz later on
MightyMark
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 18, 2010
- 5,742
- 3,088
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Golden State Warriors, NE Patriots
Purely because I dont think we should be making trades based on a single game. Watts was awful, but I cannot beleive that it will translate into an awful year.
Suban on the other hand had a good game, but once again that doesnt translate to a good season.
I feel, and it is purely my opinion, that Watts will bounce back. If im wrong ill accept that, and he will be out of my team next week. But for now im keeping the faith.
If you spend the extra cash wisely, then by all means go with Suban, but regardless of the efforts last weekend, I rate Watts ahead of Suban.
Either way, I think we should revisit this in the next few weeks
toxic
Premium Gold
jakeystringer
Rookie
haha so, no?you were crazeeee for not having GAJ to start with, so why not continue.....
toxic
Premium Gold
if you the right rookies then premium sideways trades should wait a week, before price rises/reductions - if you have 2 rookies you must get next week then this week does become an option, hope that makes some sense
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
