That would be about right i reckonA fine or a week at best imo.
Hodge got 3 for an intentional elbow ffs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would be about right i reckonA fine or a week at best imo.
Hodge got 3 for an intentional elbow ffs
That wasn't the point of my post as I understand the seriousness of head injuries. A crook shoulder as you put it can end your season but it's treated as just part of the game.Acquired brain injuries, multiple concussions over a period of time has shown to cause Dementia in NFL/pro footballers at times in their life, and in very rare and tragic cases, even death as a result of a knock to the on the sporting field. The head is absolutely sacrosanct, there are potential far more repercussions then from a crook shoulder tackle (for example)
Simply put, Gibbs did put the head in some danger with the tackle, but Gray also had the option of protecting his head, but instead rode the tackle in order to keep control of the ball. Gibbs also doesnt pick him right up off the ground and fling him.
Channel 7 just reported that the club had just met and will make a call tomorrow morning.I knew this was coming from the minute the media started this bloody witch hunt. Gibbs was doomed the minute all these "professionals" started commenting how he should be getting 4 weeks ect, all these afraid that if they go against the trend and have a different opinion they'd be ridiculoud so they follow everyone else's opinion and soon enough the noise was deafening. I hope Gibbs and Carlton contest this charge as he has only been charged because all of the background noise from the media.
In addition, if you didn't get rid of it legally by hand or foot you were pinged... what exactly was wrong with those rules?Terrible call. It was a legitimate tackle. In fact, I'd say it was almost a perfect tackle, and totally within the rules. No free kick paid.
IMO if the AFL want to stop injuries resulting from extended and rough tackling, the best thing they could do is instruct the umpires to properly police the holding the ball rule. This rule has been eroded over the last couple of decades to now mean if you hold onto the ball you can get a ball up. This encourages players to do just that, take on the tackle and ride it out in the hope of a ball up. Take a look at some of the footage from the 70s in particular. As soon as a player in possession was grabbed, they were gone unless they got rid of it quickly. This discouraged the player from riding the tackle and encouraged them to dispose of the ball before they got into trouble. 70's Robbie Gray (now there's an awful image) gets rid of the ball when he realises he's about to be tackled. 2015 Robbie Gray holds onto it because he knows he's a better than even chance of getting a ball up.
I for threeI for two.