2015; Player X or Player Y or Player Z

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Parker or Treloar?
I'm going Trelour because of bye but if i didn't have jpk, titch and buddy it would be a line ball. Would probably still go Trelour because he's a couple of bucks cheaper.

I'm actually thinking about SJ now. Tossing up;

SJ v Trelour.


Think I'll stick with Trelour partly due to me not having to pick another geelong player and get frustrated with SC scores and not enjoy games...
 
I'm going Trelour because of bye but if i didn't have jpk, titch and buddy it would be a line ball. Would probably still go Trelour because he's a couple of bucks cheaper.

I'm actually thinking about SJ now. Tossing up;

SJ v Trelour.


Think I'll stick with Trelour partly due to me not having to pick another geelong player and get frustrated with SC scores and not enjoy games...
I think SJ would be more reliable.
 
Parker or Treloar?

Depends how many Sydney players you have, if you already have JPK, Buddy and Titch, then go Treloar, otherwise grab Parker, he is going to peak soon.

I have to choose a rookie and a premium.

It should be Corey Ellis.

Also why Hanners.

Go with Ellis, he is on the bubble, and it is usually a good sign when they are selected on the field.
 
Lever v's Corey Ellis.

Lever looks to be more settled, and from all reports has better JS, where as Ellis could find himself on the outer quickly.

Good sign for Ellis being named on the field though, wasn't expecting that to be honest.
 
I'm not sold on Rocky either. Looks injured, and could very well likely drag on with low numbers. I'm thinking Mitchell over Rocky myself.
Of course he looks injured. He's come back 3 weeks early from broken ribs and a punctured lung, as well as getting knocked out. Despite all this he's put out 90s in the past two weeks. I'm not bringing him in this week, but he'll definitely be in next week
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

What if considering ranking? I've been smashed with injuries and sitting 12k. Given shaw is 26% ownership and prone to miss a few should I go a pod to try and make up some ground.
id be almost certain the winning team end of year will have shaw.
dont think pods are so important in defense this year.
most folks cop a 50-60 each week in defense. so many unsafe bets in defense. take the safe one imo.
 
Laird 100k cheaper though?

Thats true, but you ask who would be the better POD.

If your after advice on who to choose, I would go Laird, he is cheaper and Adelaides backs are running thin so he should continue his form. Also my point regarding Picken returning to a run with role is a valid one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top