List Mgmt. 2015 Trade, Free agency and draft rumours

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Take that, dumb saints!
Woo hoo! If true, then awesome news!!! It's got me up an about on a late Sunday evening where, I have nothing to do or celebrate with.lol.

Btw, yea man, saints were and have been aggressive about it as well. Phew!
 
Yer like im gunna go there ....ask a Mod to validate my source but id be mad to name it here would i not ??? :rolleyes:
hd knows his stuff fellas. Always reliable with his info
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

This is gut-wrenching! Such a let-down. I honestly thought we had a good chance at Danger....
Oh well.......back to the drawing board.
I could be grasping at straws but it's not like Fox was under oath.

I recall club officials saying we were unlikely to be able to make a sufficient offer to Frawley last year. Yet we did anyway.
 
I could be grasping at straws but it's not like Fox was under oath.

I recall club officials saying we were unlikely to be able to make a sufficient offer to Frawley last year. Yet we did anyway.
Exactly.

About the equivalent of a Yank declaring that they're not running for President...
 
So.

What's the chances we look at kreuzer?
Looking & laughing at he & carltank? Chances are high!

He'd cost a 1st Rounder & we'd then have 4x 1st Ruckmen under 26 on the list.

If we're looking at him, I really hope that its for entertainment's sake.
 
Looking & laughing at he & carltank? Chances are high!

He'd cost a 1st Rounder & we'd then have 4x 1st Ruckmen under 26 on the list.

If we're looking at him, I really hope that its for entertainment's sake.
Restricted free agent. Worth a punt. I think he is a proven second ruckman/goalkicker. Its unfortunate that the ball goes forward at carlton
 
Restricted free agent. Worth a punt. I think he is a proven second ruckman/goalkicker. Its unfortunate that the ball goes forward at carlton
So a Hale replacement? Maybe. Carltank would match his price & force a trade, surely? Why wouldn't they?

Maybe if we sent a ruckman their way in a trade. Big Boy for Yarran & they don't get in our way to force Kruzer's price up?

I still don't like it - unless the overall result was Yarran, Kruzer & 2nd for Big Boy & 2nd. Still don't like it though.
 
So a Hale replacement? Maybe. Carltank would match his price & force a trade, surely? Why wouldn't they?

Maybe if we sent a ruckman their way in a trade. Big Boy for Yarran & they don't get in our way to force Kruzer's price up?

I still don't like it - unless the overall result was Yarran, Kruzer & 2nd for Big Boy & 2nd. Still don't like it though.

Why would they match it when they would essentially gain pick 3 or 4 for him as compo? that's better than what they would get from a trade!
 
Why would they match it when they would essentially gain pick 3 or 4 for him as compo? that's better than what they would get from a trade!

Because the length/size of the contract we'd be offering wouldn't get them a first-rounder
 
The more I watch nicnat, goldy, Jacobs the more I think 'what an absolutely brilliant bunch of inside mids we must have' that these guys never had the rucks in the ilk of those guys! Nicnat is a untamed monster at the centre clearances. I would like a technically great tap ruckman if we can jag one at the trade table.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top