- Thread starter
- #2,176
That tank is a nice surprise considering he is such a massive kid, hmm.Maybe Logue can become a mid with a tank like that. Hmmmm....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
That tank is a nice surprise considering he is such a massive kid, hmm.Maybe Logue can become a mid with a tank like that. Hmmmm....
That tank is a nice surprise considering he is such a massive kid, hmm.
He certainly is versatile, his hair is very distracting though hehHope he lasts to our first...
He certainly is versatile, his hair is very distracting though heh
I have thought this for a while, he works well in traffic and can run all day plus he has really nice skills. Reminds me a little bit of Mundy with how he moves but is better overhead.Maybe Logue can become a mid with a tank like that. Hmmmm....
Have seen a bit of talk that a few clubs rate Logue top ten fwiw.
Maybe, but Florent seems like more of an impact player for less touches whereas Hunter wins more of the ball. Florent also doesn't have the inside scope of Hunter.Wouldn't surprise me.
Is it just me or does anybody else see a bit of Lachie Hunter in Oliver Florent?
I get the feeling he will be a pretty safe bet, and at his height that makes for a good prospectHave seen a bit of talk that a few clubs rate Logue top ten fwiw.
I wouldn't agree that Florent doesn't have the inside scope, he has a really nice step through traffic and has great endurance as well.Maybe, but Florent seems like more of an impact player for less touches whereas Hunter wins more of the ball. Florent also doesn't have the inside scope of Hunter.
15-16 for around their age groupWhat is the minimum to be considered 'elite' for the beep test?
Have seen a bit of talk that a few clubs rate Logue top ten fwiw.
Yeah I'm a big fan of him as well, would be very happy if we got him.If we could upgrade some of the third rounders we're likely to get through trades to a mid-second round pick I reckon he's worth a really good look. Really, really like what he could offer the Dogs.
I've heard Collingwood, North and "at least one other club" have him rated top ten, but of course neither of those teams actually have a top ten pick at this stage. Not sure on the talk's legitimacy though. Certainly sounds like an intriguing prospect.Heard North are into him. Which is pick 11, who in the top 10 is?
No... I'm not sure that's right. There are much better options than defenders that will be available at 18 - Simpkin, Battle, Drew, Gallucci and others, would be much more worthy selections at pick 18. Tom Williamson isn't even a certainty to be taken in the national draft, let alone in the first round, so I don't think we'd be eyeing him off for our first. I'm not a fan of Berry's either. Hasn't shown enough consistency as a third tall and would take a long time to develop as a forward. His performances this year haven't been terrific.I think our 1st selection will certainly go with a defender given that Morris, Boyd & Murphy are outliers on our list age profile at 34.
Jarrod Berry would be fantastic if he is available.. Tom Williamson could be another.
Also very keen on Ben Long.
Was pushing Berry as 1st rd.. Williamson as 2nd rd if we miss Berry..No... I'm not sure that's right. There are much better options than defenders that will be available at 18 - Simpkin, Battle, Drew, Gallucci and others, would be much more worthy selections at pick 18. Tom Williamson isn't even a certainty to be taken in the national draft, let alone in the first round, so I don't think we'd be eyeing him off for our first. I'm not a fan of Berry's either. Hasn't shown enough consistency as a third tall and would take a long time to develop as a forward. His performances this year haven't been terrific.