Forget that Brentmeister and Sanders exist, hit us with itAm I allowed here??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Forget that Brentmeister and Sanders exist, hit us with itAm I allowed here??
Band 2 is end of the 1st round. Band 3 is a 2nd round pick, straight after their normal pick.Then there is an irresistible force -immovable object paradox. Because no way Brisbane let him leave for a second round compensation pick.
Conspiracy theory, blah blah blah.No you keep ignoring how the AFL interpret such guidelines they set for themselves and how they consistently manipulate them to suit their agenda. They are a law unto themselves and answer to no body else. There are no conspiracies or fantasies but they consistently will manipulate a rules/guidelines that have a grey area to suit their agenda. You cannot define materially anomalous in this instance. Its a case by case basis. You are saying $800k is fair yet $950k is materially anomalous...a mere 18% above fair? Where is the line drawn? I would have thought 30-50% above fair would be more out of the ordinary and anomaly. Everyone thought Betts at $550k a year was way over his worth. Most had him valued at $400-$450k. Thats 22-38% above what everyone said was fair. Is that materially anomalous?
My point is 'materially anomalous' is up for debate and I guarantee you if the AFL sees fit it will suit their agenda.
You are ignorant and naive to believe bodies such as the AFL, NBA, FIFA, MLB do not continuously manipulate situations to suit their own agenda.
Am I allowed here??
Haha. Yeah thats it kfc...totally at zero. Lol. I come here just to see you flustered. Made my day.
Totally at zero. Literally and precisely at zero
Less arguing - indulge us with anything that will get the thread back on trackI look forward to your middle of the night up yourself, figjam, condescending replys to each individual post on here.....your highness.....man I wish I was half the internet keyboard warrior you were. My hero. No one else will say it but everyone knows it.
Maybe AFL Trade Leaks will tell us?Look can we stop with the posts asking what reshorses news is. If he intended on sharing it he's already been asked and ignored them.
I would be more interested in knowing who redhorses alias is.
I look forward to your middle of the night up yourself, figjam, condescending replys to each individual post on here.....your highness.....man I wish I was half the internet keyboard warrior you were. My hero. No one else will say it but everyone knows it.
Look can we stop with the posts asking what reshorses news is. If he intended on sharing it he's already been asked and ignored them.
I would be more interested in knowing who redhorses alias is.
Pretty obvious it's Sanders.I would be more interested in knowing who redhorses alias is.
Pretty obvious it's Sanders.
Alias?
Just the one?
YesIs this the time of year the gossip heats up and the ghost posters come out of the dark?
Agreed. I thought Brisbane might be keen on letting him go since they are going through a rebuild and Rocky doesnt seem to be the best role model at times.
But for only a second round pick? Hell no.
Brisbane still has a hard time of finding players wanting to stick around and Rocky actually wants to.
He's not "definitely best 22" and never has been.
Obviously if Rockliff actually gets a contract offer in the top 5%, he will generate band 1 compensation. What I'm suggesting is that a) no club would give him that sort of contract (assumed to be $900k+ per year) and b) the AFL wouldn't bend the rules to give Brisbane band 1 compensation if he actually falls into band 2 compensation.