Purple Jesus
not jess
Watching the Jonathan Brown highlights on the AFL website makes me want to cry. When will we ever have a) delivery like he got and b) such a monster forward.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think I'm so happy we went to just purple & white
I like it but no more than the current one.
No-one seems to have reported whether Kreuzer was off for concussion or for his wrist, nor how he is doing now. The only concern seems to be with Paddy - awful reporting.http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-...on-more-important-patrick-dangerfield/8758658
Gotta say I agree with Richard Hinds here...
That flog crumpet face on 6pr this morning reckons Harley looks disinterested playing for Peel and won't make his debut with Freo this year.
He's not wrong about the second part. I doubt the gaol, since his WAFL return, has been for him to play in the ones. He is just coming from too far back. Get through the WAFL season play finals then build for next year.That flog crumpet face on 6pr this morning reckons Harley looks disinterested playing for Peel and won't make his debut with Freo this year.
That flog crumpet face on 6pr this morning reckons Harley looks disinterested playing for Peel and won't make his debut with Freo this year.
Good article.I agree with Richard Hinds
I heard that call too and posted this in the Peel thread.
"Crumpet Face just reported that Harley Bennell was verbally abused and trashed talked all game which seemed to effect his game. I know the Swans crowd is renowned for being feral out there, or was he talking about the Swans players?"
Deets?I see Cometti is doing his best to perpetuate myths again this morning!
This is just as bad as Fyfe being robbed of the Brownlow in 2014, no way that should have gotten a week...
Danger should be filthy
That's not the rule though and nor should it be. You have to protect the head because you can't barter with trauma. It doesn't stop causing damage because you didn't mean it.I just can't see any force or desire to hurt in that tackle, can't even make out a second motion in it, just looks like one slow tackle without much force.
I cant see any force in the tackle though, it would at most be low impact but I would call it negligibleThat's not the rule though and nor should it be. You have to protect the head because you can't barter with trauma. It doesn't stop causing damage because you didn't mean it.
I just can't see any force or desire to hurt in that tackle, can't even make out a second motion in it, just looks like one slow tackle without much force.
I cant see any force in the tackle though, it would at most be low impact but I would call it negligible
100%.He drove Kreuzer's head into the ground long after he got rid of the ball. In wrestling terms, it was almost like a DDT. All similar tackles this season where both arms have been pinned and the player has been knocked out or concussed have resulted in suspensions. People are only now up in arms because it is Dangerfield.
Whether you agree the action is worthy of a ban or not is irrelevant. There is precedent and there would have been much outrage that he got off because he is the Brownlow favourite. Part of me thinks direction came from the AFL to make sure there was a ban to avoid the shit storm they had after the Houli incident.