Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hawks have updated their final number
View attachment 399553
So I take you to still rely on Hawthorn generiousity to survive?
Jesus youd think the 16 or so minnows reliant on the heavy lifters would be more grateful to their overlords
The Tiges rattle some tins, get out of debt and have altogether become quite lippy. It's actually quite cute
How are those non ticketed memberships going, does the AFL still slash about 12k off your numbers when they audit?
The Hawthorn membership numbers are the biggest AFL open farce and joke in the industry.
Completely made up, and everyone knows it.
This is despite when compared to each other - last time Richmond made membership revenue figures available was 2014 - hawthorn members paid more on average.
2016 Membership Revenue per Member
- Gold Coast - $459.89 (includes ticketing)
- Adelaide - $404.41
- West Coast - $322.96
- Fremantle - $317.24
- Geelong - $274.77 (includes gate reciepts)
- Brisbane - $240.59 (includes gate reciepts)
- Melbourne - $193.58 (includes fundraising)
- Essendon - $175.67
- st Kilda - $174.44
- Cartlon - $171.92
- Hawthorn - $164.86
- North - $160.98
- Western Bulldogs - $159.99
- GWS - $82.19 (includes merchandise)
Nah that's not how it worksThe reason why the membership numbers do not add up and a clearly fiction is because they do not correlate with drawing a crowd.
I am not saying that they are not paid for by someone, probably multiple corporates, but these 'members' don't turn up to games, which means that for all intents and purposes they are fictional
The reason why the membership numbers do not add up and a clearly fiction is because they do not correlate with drawing a crowd.
I am not saying that they are not paid for by someone, probably multiple corporates, but these 'members' don't turn up to games, which means that for all intents and purposes they are fictional
This is despite when compared to each other - last time Richmond made membership revenue figures available was 2014 - hawthorn members paid more on average.
2016 Membership Revenue per Member
- Gold Coast - $459.89 (includes ticketing)
- Adelaide - $404.41
- West Coast - $322.96
- Fremantle - $317.24
- Geelong - $274.77 (includes gate reciepts)
- Brisbane - $240.59 (includes gate reciepts)
- Melbourne - $193.58 (includes fundraising)
- Essendon - $175.67
- st Kilda - $174.44
- Cartlon - $171.92
- Hawthorn - $164.86
- North - $160.98
- Western Bulldogs - $159.99
- GWS - $82.19 (includes merchandise)
Nah that's not how it works
People that go to games don't have to be members or even supporters of either club playing
Every club has interstate and overseas members that don't get many or any opportunities to go to games but still want to support their clubs.
And the whole BigFooty crowds argument acts like every club member buys an 11 game membership at minimum and has not life outside of footy.
Wow what an articulate response I can see you are a deep thinker
Care to explain why you think it's rubbish?
On the back of their "membership" hawthorn should have the biggest crowds in the country.
Even though they have been successful, they still don't even crack the top 4 in crowds
They still need to relocate half their home games to Tasmania.
This is not what a huge club with massive support need to do, because if they had so many fans, they would just stay in Melbourne.
The membership numbers are a farce, at a guess 20,000 of them are gifts from corporates to staff.
They arent real members, and thats why they can't get real crowds, and they have to relocate to tasmania
This is why it is rubbish, and everyone in the industry knows it.
Nah that's not how it works
People that go to games don't have to be members or even supporters of either club playing
Every club has interstate and overseas members that don't get many or any opportunities to go to games but still want to support their clubs.
And the whole BigFooty crowds argument acts like every club member buys an 11 game membership at minimum and has not life outside of footy.
Add to this:
2) hawks have a much higher proportion of junior members than any other club. Kids go to fewer games because they need an available adult to take them to the game, school holidays, family stuff, difficulty around late night games and late sunday games, and being grounded for being a dick
because they offer in their family memberships two adults and four kidsAdd to this:
2) hawks have a much higher proportion of junior members than any other club. Kids go to fewer games because they need an available adult to take them to the game, school holidays, family stuff, difficulty around late night games and late sunday games, and being grounded for being a dick
"
Yep, the numbers seem too disproportionate for it to be simply greater underlying support or Hawks doing well marketing to kids. It's a technical reason and not really representative.because they offer in their family memberships two adults and four kids
all or most other clubs offer two adults & two kids
simple explanation to the larger numbers
having been so successful of late its understandable that they will have large support by kids, but nearly double to the next club! NO!Yep, the numbers seem too disproportionate for it to be simply greater underlying support or Hawks doing well marketing to kids. It's a technical reason and not really representative.