List Mgmt. 2018 St Kilda Trade Thread Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Geelong would have to come up with an extremely enticing offer for us to even consider trading Stuv.

Interesting reading Cook's comments though, about them having to re-evaluate where they're at and where they're going.

If they do decide to go all-in for a flag then there's every chance that they will in fact make us an offer that's pretty much too good to refuse, given how they usually willingly pay overs if it gets a deal done.

This year's and next year's firsts would probably be the bare minimum they'd offer.

Doubt Kelly is worth pick 5. Especially as Freo could potentially get Max King there and they've been after someone like him for years and years. I wouldn't swap 5 for him if I was them I don't think. Their midfield is already stacked with Fyfe, Neale (?), Mundy (temp), Hill x 2, Brayshaw, Cerra, Blakely and Walters, so I'd say they need M King more.
 
Last edited:
It's not even a rumour, it's just us talking about anyone from other clubs that might be a potential trade target, and because you guys will be looking to free up cap space for Lynch, and he's not in the seniors, he might be the type that is available, and who would be a clear upgrade on some we've got, or have let go.
I don't think anything concrete. Just speculation that Richmond might have cap problems fitting in Lynch. And who would possibly go. I wouldn't worry about it. Just BF talk.
Cheers, appreciate the response

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
 
Geelong would have to come up with an extremely enticing offer for us to even consider trading Stuv.

Interesting reading Cook's comments though, about them having to re-evaluate where they're at and where they're going.

If they do decide to go all-in for a flag then there's every chance that they will in fact make us an offer that's pretty much too good to refuse, given how they usually willingly pay overs if it gets a deal done.

This year's and next year's firsts would probably be the bare minimum they'd offer.

Doubt Kelly is worth pick 5. Especially as Freo could potentially get Max King there and they've been after someone like him for years and years. I wouldn't swap 5 for him if I was them I don't think. Their midfield is already stacked with Fyfe, Neale (?), Hill x 2, Brayshaw, Cerra and Walters, so I'd say they need M King more.
They'll get pick 5 for Neale.
 
Geelong would have to come up with an extremely enticing offer for us to even consider trading Stuv.

Interesting reading Cook's comments though, about them having to re-evaluate where they're at and where they're going.

If they do decide to go all-in for a flag then there's every chance that they will in fact make us an offer that's pretty much too good to refuse, given how they usually willingly pay overs if it gets a deal done.

This year's and next year's firsts would probably be the bare minimum they'd offer.

Doubt Kelly is worth pick 5. Especially as Freo could potentially get Max King there and they've been after someone like him for years and years. I wouldn't swap 5 for him if I was them I don't think. Their midfield is already stacked with Fyfe, Neale (?), Hill x 2, Brayshaw, Cerra and Walters, so I'd say they need M King more.

Agree with this. Don't see pick 5 going to Geelong. With Stuv the state of play is that he is contracted, happy to stay, they approached us and he's our best player. 2 firsts would be the minimum I'd say, on top of that I wouldn't be bargaining, if Stuv is open to it I'd name the price and they choose to pay it or not. I still believe he is worth too much to us to trade.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top