List Mgmt. 2018 Trade, Free Agency & Draft thread MK II [Polec ✔️ Hall ✔️ Gaff ❓ Newman ❓]

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
If naturally north's mail is correct that we don't rate him and prefer Xerri, then you can bet your life his agent has informed other clubs of this. So the whole "he's contracted, make clubs pay overs" probably isn't going to fly here.

The faux outrage when we end up with 43 for a VFL ruckman without an AFL tank will be amusing though.

The idea that we don't rate him is ridiculous. I can understand if we possibly rate Xerri higher but you clearly don't toss out a 3 year extension to a player you don't rate.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Has been widely reported for months he's been exploring his options.

Yeah but he may be exploring his options because the club has encouraged him to. Him being contracted isn't all that relevant if the club doesn't want to keep him.
 
The idea that we don't rate him is ridiculous. I can understand if we possibly rate Xerri higher but you clearly don't toss out a 3 year extension to a player you don't rate.

We may have rated him then, but have re-evaluated what we are looking for at that position and decided he doesn't fit. Or we may have misjudged his capabilities and potential. Or we wanted him to work on certain areas in the VFL and haven't seen results. There could be a million reasons why our outlook on him has changed.
 
As I understand it, Eagles won't match our terms on Gaff. Unwilling to.

Over to Gaffy now, stay or head to Victoria.

In what context friend? Years or dollars?
 
Don’t get pruess’ motivation here but whatever, cough up the requisite pick(s) and Casey can have him
I believe he just got sick of NM BigFooty posters not spelling his name correctly, and he is hoping the private school educated fellows do a better job.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If naturally north's mail is correct that we don't rate him and prefer Xerri, then you can bet your life his agent has informed other clubs of this. So the whole "he's contracted, make clubs pay overs" probably isn't going to fly here.

The faux outrage when we end up with 43 for a VFL ruckman without an AFL tank will be amusing though.


giphy.gif
 
We may have rated him then, but have re-evaluated what we are looking for at that position and decided he doesn't fit. Or we may have misjudged his capabilities and potential. Or we wanted him to work on certain areas in the VFL and haven't seen results. There could be a million reasons why our outlook on him has changed.


Again , well said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top