Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dusty is still a big no from meWhat's the consensus on dusty?
Going toaverage 100?
Or still playing forward mid?
Also is Heeney the ultimate premium over say Dunkley etc?
I disagree with pups regarding Dusty. With Lynch coming into their forward line I see him spending 95% of game time in the guts. I also feel the 6,6,6 rule is made for players like him and Danger.What's the consensus on dusty?
Going toaverage 100?
Or still playing forward mid?
Also is Heeney the ultimate premium over say Dunkley etc?
Dusty has turned into a finisherI disagree with pups regarding Dusty. With Lynch coming into their forward line I see him spending 95% of game time in the guts. I also feel the 6,6,6 rule is made for players like him and Danger.
I certainly expect a 105 average from him this year.
Obviously a risky pick whichever way you look at it. Am tossing up between him and Rozee +70k. Both give me the swing man option, and I do think Rozee will get a chance on a wing or even at HB at some stage. Probably don't want to have all of Port's rookies though.
Darcy Moore??? I've had a sneaky look after the first 2 JLT's...don't mind the DPP but I think at the same time he will not generate much cash. Which is why I was looking at him because players like Collins and Rozee are somewhat similar in that regard.
I disagree with pups regarding Dusty. With Lynch coming into their forward line I see him spending 95% of game time in the guts. I also feel the 6,6,6 rule is made for players like him and Danger.
I certainly expect a 105 average from him this year.
Thinking along the same lines, 105 average probably puts him just outside the top 8 scores, but close enough considering the potential value. Got him sitting at M4 at the moment, have the cash to potentially upgrade him to Cripps. Think holding the cash is potentially better, so any suprise selections does cause a giant reshuffle.
ThisAt the same price, I think Sloane, Brouch and Taranto are better value.
I could very easily be wrong though (I usually am with this kind of thing)
At the same price, I think Sloane, Brouch and Taranto are better value.
I could very easily be wrong though (I usually am with this kind of thing)
This
Sloane by a country mile due to his scoring history
I expect Taranto to start well as Ward is still out for about a month, but can he last the season? I think he'd be a ripper starting AFLF pick though. Brouch is like a poor mans Dayne Beams, scores well but has the injury prone tag over his head, if he got a proper discount I'd consider him, but he didn't, so I feel Sloane is the answer there.
I'm looking at Dusty purely from a role/playing style perspective here, he's done nothing to suggest he's willing to dig in and accumulate the footy/win a regular hardball, I feel he's Richmond's finisher now, not accumulatorAgree with Taranto, I also have him at M5 for those reasons.
Crouch is a big risk and would need a decent discount for me to consider, think he’s potentially a trap. Crows have been secrective about his injuries in the past, seem to recall being pulled from game last minute and been out 3+ weeks.
Comparing Sloane is Interesting (has been in my side at stages)
Scoring history over the past 5 years are Dusty 97,103,107, 113, 92 vs Sloane 104, 95, 106, 107, 89.
Would even argue Dusty scoring history has been better. I know Sloane ceiling is huge, but that’s always lowered because he doesn’t handle the tags.
Could be potentially looking at a few in the first few games.
In JLT2 he's scored 95 in 65% of game time. Given his usual 90% of game time that would equate to 120. As much as I understand your logic, I'm not particularly concerned how a player scores his points as long as he scores them. I'm still convinced the new rules will suit him down to the ground as will the recruitment of Lynch.Dusty has turned into a finisher
Others are doing the grunt work for him imo
He'll need to get it 35-40 times a week to maintain a 100+ point average, or hit the scoreboard more often than not, he'll probably go 95-100 but doubt he'll be 105+ again until he shows a willingness to mark and tackle regularly
Having been a Sam Mitchell, Matt Crouch and Lachie Neale owner over the last 3 years, 3 players who don't mark and tackle as regularly as they should when I owned them, you see scoring trends develop. These guys would get it 30 times a game but only score 80-90s because of their poor kick to handball ratios and the lack of mark/tackles. When they took a few grabs or laid a few tackles they generally tonned up, but it wasn't that often.
Dusty generally has a good kick to handball ratio but he has lost his mark and tackle game imo
I originally thought Moore was a viable option . He will certainly score more than what you are paying for him but I do agree with you that a 60 or so from him is not as good as a 50-60 from a rookie. I have therefore decided to pass.Interesting to see Moore pop up in a few teams lately. I'd had him in mind after JLT1, and then was thinking of going Roberton down to him after the heart thing.
Watched him closely in JLT2, and was still very undecided.
Pros:
- Taking a lot of kick ins.
- great mark.
- Collingwood based on JLT will be chipping it around a lot down back.
- dual position status.
Cons:
- Was playing pretty lockdown on Curnow, is he likely to do that most weeks? New 6-6-6 rules mean his type are less able to peel off as interceptors.
- It's not like moving back is a new thing for him, did it a bit last year and still scored poorly. May have learnt a bit about it with a full preseason aiming at that role though. Is an average of 60 good enough when a rookie might get close to that for 100-150k less?
- Howe is likely to be their main interceptor type.
- Very injury prone.
Obviously a risky pick whichever way you look at it. Am tossing up between him and Rozee +70k. Both give me the swing man option, and I do think Rozee will get a chance on a wing or even at HB at some stage. Probably don't want to have all of Port's rookies though.
I'm still totally up in the air about Sloane. I didn't originally start with him but his JLT form was so good I put him in. I'm fully aware that there is no tagging at all in JLT and we all know how well Sloane handles a tag.At the same price, I think Sloane, Brouch and Taranto are better value.
I could very easily be wrong though (I usually am with this kind of thing)
I think Sloane will be the #1 tag target for usI'm still totally up in the air about Sloane. I didn't originally start with him but his JLT form was so good I put him in. I'm fully aware that there is no tagging at all in JLT and we all know how well Sloane handles a tag.
With no tag, he will most likely score 120 but if he does cop a heavy one his score is more likely to go to 80. With a midfield comprising him, Gibbs & Crouch * 2, will he be the one to cop the tag or will it be one of the others?
I have currently replaced Sloane with Yeo but it could go back to Sloane and I can bank $120K to use later if need be.
in AF I do, RDT I dont like to end up with many players not in that top ave bracket in each line and theres reasonable chance both are close enough to be happy with 1 at M8 but not both (both may be good enough but theres definite risk)As per the little girl in the TV ad - why not both?
But when we talk about risk, let's look at last year.in AF I do, RDT I dont like to end up with many players not in that top ave bracket in each line and theres reasonable chance both are close enough to be happy with 1 at M8 but not both (both may be good enough but theres definite risk)
Ive fallen short before having "completed" sides with full premolar lines but they just aren't the top 6/8.
Last year I took the approach top only lock in top line options with premiums (expected) including when trading in unless an absolute bargain and I stormed home.
McKernan was in career best form last season before doing his hammy.. he will be a lock...Clarke will be fighting for a spot with James Stewart and Mitch Brown. Clarke's ability to play ruck may put him in the front seat to get first crack early on in the season.Just reported that Daniher is set to miss up to 6 weeks with a calf injury. Does this open up a spot for Clarke or does McKernan have the spot all but sewn up ??
Question is, if Clarke plays Rd1 do you pay the 70k to have him generating cash at R3 over the cheapest non playing Fwd/Ruck or do you save that cash?McKernan was in career best form last season before doing his hammy.. he will be a lock...Clarke will be fighting for a spot with James Stewart and Mitch Brown. Clarke's ability to play ruck may put him in the front seat to get first crack early on in the season.