2020 Non-Crows AFL Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
So why exactly is Wines having a reporter in his house a problem?
People can go to other people's houses now, yeah?

The AFL got special approval to start their comp early by providing a control plan to the relevant governments. It included interviews only via internet or at the club. The players are effectively isolated from the rest of us.
 
So I realise I can be a bit slow sometimes but I'm trying to work this out:

Wines is in trouble for having a local reporter in a state with zero active cases come into his home but

Steven is not in trouble for getting stabbed not coming clean to the circumstances with a police investigation still ongoing.

Is this right?
 
The AFL got special approval to start their comp early by providing a control plan to the relevant governments. It included interviews only via internet or at the club. The players are effectively isolated from the rest of us.
Have we gone totally crazy with some of the rules. I understand the need for a control plan being in place but some of the detail must leave us wondering who is in charge.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Laughable when they go on and on about heritage and the importance of their history. They 'have' to wear the prison bars because it's soooo important to their history. Oh, but we are happy to completely denigrate it by plastering an oversized sponsors logo over it and to completely overshadow our club logo (that we stole and copied) for the $$$.
Koch has zero interest in their actual heritage. It's just bluff and grandstanding.

It is laughable that they don't even know their "own" heritage (or that of the real Port Adelaide Magpies), their jumper was designed as wharf pylons not prison bars.

Although it shouldn't come as a surprise the Johnny come Lately Powah supporters don't know anything about the real Port Adelaide.
 
So I realise I can be a bit slow sometimes but I'm trying to work this out:

Wines is in trouble for having a local reporter in a state with zero active cases come into his home but

Steven is not in trouble for getting stabbed not coming clean to the circumstances with a police investigation still ongoing.

Is this right?
Not sure getting stabbed by an ex was listed in the AFL's isolation protocols
 
So I realise I can be a bit slow sometimes but I'm trying to work this out:

Wines is in trouble for having a local reporter in a state with zero active cases come into his home but

Steven is not in trouble for getting stabbed not coming clean to the circumstances with a police investigation still ongoing.

Is this right?
yup.
 
So I realise I can be a bit slow sometimes but I'm trying to work this out:

Wines is in trouble for having a local reporter in a state with zero active cases come into his home but

Steven is not in trouble for getting stabbed not coming clean to the circumstances with a police investigation still ongoing.

Is this right?

Yes but one is from a VFL darling club, Geelong, who has past players peppered through the media.

The other is from a Club located dangerously close to the Crows, Caro is investigating how Tex is involved, I'm sure she will work in the camp somewhere as well.
 
So I realise I can be a bit slow sometimes but I'm trying to work this out:

Wines is in trouble for having a local reporter in a state with zero active cases come into his home but

Steven is not in trouble for getting stabbed not coming clean to the circumstances with a police investigation still ongoing.

Is this right?

Yes, but there’s no commonality. To get approval to re-start the season, the AFL submitted a plan of controls. Wines has breached those, Steven did not. The AFL competition is now and will remain isolated from the community at large except in specific and controlled situations. This did not include random people rolling into your house.
 
Yes but one is from a VFL darling club, Geelong, who has past players peppered through the media.

The other is from a Club located dangerously close to the Crows, Caro is investigating how Tex is involved, I'm sure she will work in the camp somewhere as well.

You do know that AFL players weren’t in AFL controlled isolation when Steven got stabbed though. He was only required to adhere to govt social distancing rules. These are new rules created so the comp can start early. Why does Steven’s name keep coming up, it’s totally irrelevant.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

It is laughable that they don't even know their "own" heritage (or that of the real Port Adelaide Magpies), their jumper was designed as wharf pylons not prison bars.

Although it shouldn't come as a surprise the Johnny come Lately Powah supporters don't know anything about the real Port Adelaide.
Or that their real colours are pink and white...
 
Laughable when they go on and on about heritage and the importance of their history. They 'have' to wear the prison bars because it's soooo important to their history. Oh, but we are happy to completely denigrate it by plastering an oversized sponsors logo over it and to completely overshadow our club logo (that we stole and copied) for the $$$.
Koch has zero interest in their actual heritage. It's just bluff and grandstanding.
"Our history is so important, also we've changed our home jumper, but history!"
 
You do know that AFL players weren’t in AFL controlled isolation when Steven got stabbed though. He was only required to adhere to govt social distancing rules. These are new rules created so the comp can start early. Why does Steven’s name keep coming up, it’s totally irrelevant.

It was more about how the media report two incidents (irrelevant they are different) from different clubs, they go harder on interstate clubs for ANY type of incident.
 
So I realise I can be a bit slow sometimes but I'm trying to work this out:

Wines is in trouble for having a local reporter in a state with zero active cases come into his home but

Steven is not in trouble for getting stabbed not coming clean to the circumstances with a police investigation still ongoing.

Is this right?
What's more confusing is the noise around Wines indiscretion, is nothing on the Crows players congregating on an empty Golf Course, after travelling together
 
Yes, but there’s no commonality. To get approval to re-start the season, the AFL submitted a plan of controls. Wines has breached those, Steven did not. The AFL competition is now and will remain isolated from the community at large except in specific and controlled situations. This did not include random people rolling into your house.

So you know all the exact details about the Steven case do you? Even though the police case is still running, you know for a fact he wasn't breaching any protocols be it Government of AFL based?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top