WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #802
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think you've nailed it. Backline is standard/good. Midfield is awesome. 5 guns plus what i really like is that you've spent alot on rookies here which gives you great flexibility as well as hopefully the rookies with the best job security. Rucks are good and forwards are decent given rest of your team. I think Jones is important for your forwardline. I think he is worth the extra investment for the job security that he seemingly has. I see a lot of other teams with Bonar at F4 and i think its too risky given that not many rookie forwards have presented themselves yet and the ones that have will probably score shithouse (Georgiades, King). There is plenty of time left for more forward rookies to come to the party but at the moment i cant see how people are confident starting 3 on field.
I think you've nailed it. Backline is standard/good. Midfield is awesome. 5 guns plus what i really like is that you've spent alot on rookies here which gives you great flexibility as well as hopefully the rookies with the best job security. Rucks are good and forwards are decent given rest of your team. I think Jones is important for your forwardline. I think he is worth the extra investment for the job security that he seemingly has. I see a lot of other teams with Bonar at F4 and i think its too risky given that not many rookie forwards have presented themselves yet and the ones that have will probably score shithouse (Georgiades, King). There is plenty of time left for more forward rookies to come to the party but at the moment i cant see how people are confident starting 3 on field.
Sit on it for now. Nothing can do now unfortunately with not seeing enough rookie kentsHey guys!
I'd love to know your thoughts on this side. (only $2k in the bank)
View attachment 828159
Rucks look a little thin, I'd probably go with two at least.
Rucks look a little thin, I'd probably go with two at least.
Oh you...
Hill is a must have either forward or def if named round 1.need to find a replacement for Doedee. Looking at Hill or Vandeberg but hoping something better pops up.
not 100% sold on Dangerfield. If he's not gonna spend at least 80% of his time in the midfield then I'll look elsewhere.
otherwise I'm ready to go. bring it bitches.
View attachment 828578
need to find a replacement for Doedee. Looking at Hill or Vandeberg but hoping something better pops up.
not 100% sold on Dangerfield. If he's not gonna spend at least 80% of his time in the midfield then I'll look elsewhere.
otherwise I'm ready to go. bring it bitches.
View attachment 828578
View attachment 828659
don’t know whether I really like this or not.
Version 24xe.
Fairly cookie cutter. Getting a few more "locks" after week 1 of Marsh. Only $4k left over.
View attachment 828643
I liked it a lot until i saw the rucks. That said, i like that you have the link with Ceglar so you can easily get rid of English/Naismith when they fail or when they fatten up. Forwardline looks really good and obviously the midfield is a strength. If the rucks come off you will be laughing. I don't mind going with 1 of English or Naismith but i just think Grundy is so good that you leave him out at your peril. Even though leaving Grundy out has helped you get the midfield you have, i just cant see it working in your favour. However, like i said, the Ceglar selection is a great safeguard. Overall it is good to see something different.View attachment 828659
don’t know whether I really like this or not.
McClug, Greenwood, Petracca and Ceglar all risky. which is fine in itself but when you add in the ruck choices its too much of a gamble for me.View attachment 828659
don’t know whether I really like this or not.