How hard would it be to move out of the first round next year, secure Ashcroft, then move back into the first round. I am guessing our 2023 first round would need to be involved?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Collingwood showed this year you can find points by trading futures I heard Fletcher rated at that 25 to 30 range I think he’s the only Academy player next seasonAnd if we have any highly rated academy draftees that year
Collingwood showed this year you can find points by trading futures I heard Fletcher rated at that 25 to 30 range I think he’s the only Academy player next season
You can always on trade futures as long as you pick up players in that years draft much like Melbourne have been doing the last 3 yearsI was referring to 2023. No point trading a first rounder into that year if it gets used matching a bid
Twomey talks about Sinn in this clip, from the 2:48 mark, if you want to skip ahead.
Goater is my 1A preferred kid at our first pick, Sinn is my 1B.
Collingwood showed this year you can find points by trading futures I heard Fletcher rated at that 25 to 30 range I think he’s the only Academy player next season
It's going to be more likely that our first round pick next year will be used to trade back and get more points in that year, if we like the look of both Ashcroft and Fletcher. As it is, if Ashcroft is bid on in the top few picks we'd have to go into deficit just for him even if we keep that first round pick.
Banks isn’t as fast as the Sandringham boys, or the quality of defender Wilmot is. He hasn’t been played through the midfield, so people question his versatility, and he takes the kick ins for TAS, so there’s the view his stats are padded.Can't see us taking 4 in the draft, substitute Ned Long with Sam Banks and I like it. Pick 6 looks pretty high for Josh Goater, hopefully eDPS is way off on that one. Mitch Knevitt seems to be gathering some hype, do you like him as a possible for us? Also any idea why Sam Banks is falling like a stone in a lot of peoples eyes?
Twomey has mentioned it multiple times.I can't remember where I heard it but I think teams weren't expected Dev to be at their pick in the late first round so they hadn't really set their eyes/hopes on him. After having a night to think it over they realised this kid had slipped way too far and probably should've been taken by a few teams at the end of the first night. Basically I think the extra time between picks isn't just to work out trades but also for teams to re-evaluate their draft boards to who's still available.
Banks isn’t as fast as the Sandringham boys, or the quality of defender Wilmot is. He hasn’t been played through the midfield, so people question his versatility, and he takes the kick ins for TAS, so there’s the view his stats are padded.
I believe he’s a safe pick, high character kid, like Prior.
Would fit in with the “identity” of our team.
Ok, see if I can explain this quickly.It's going to be more likely that our first round pick next year will be used to trade back and get more points in that year, if we like the look of both Ashcroft and Fletcher. As it is, if Ashcroft is bid on in the top few picks we'd have to go into deficit just for him even if we keep that first round pick.
Ok, see if I can explain this quickly.
Say we take 2 second round picks and 2 third round picks in to next year’s draft, and it’s just enough points to cover an Ashcroft bid at pick 3.
That’s all the picks we take to the draft.
There’s already talk lists are unlikely to be extended back to what they were pre covid. So there’s likely to be ~60 picks at the draft again.
We match the Ashcroft bid at 3, our highest pick moves up to pick 3, and our other 3 picks slide to the back of the draft at picks 58, 59 & 60.
So those 3 late picks still have points attached to them, so our three new picks are now worth ~480 points. Which is enough points to match a bid at pick 28.
We match a bid on Fletcher. The highest pick moves up to where the bid was made, and the last two picks move back to 59 and 60.
And we now have ~300 points again to match the next Academy kid bid.
This has never happened before, but I’m sure this is how it will work.
And then the AFL will probably change the rules to stop such a scenario happening again.
That's possible and has happened in previous drafts... except at the moment we have a first round pick and a second round pick and no third round picks.Ok, see if I can explain this quickly.
Say we take 2 second round picks and 2 third round picks in to next year’s draft, and it’s just enough points to cover an Ashcroft bid at pick 3.
That’s all the picks we take to the draft.
There’s already talk lists are unlikely to be extended back to what they were pre covid. So there’s likely to be ~60 picks at the draft again.
We match the Ashcroft bid at 3, our highest pick moves up to pick 3, and our other 3 picks slide to the back of the draft at picks 58, 59 & 60.
So those 3 late picks still have points attached to them, so our three new picks are now worth ~480 points. Which is enough points to match a bid at pick 28.
We match a bid on Fletcher. The highest pick moves up to where the bid was made, and the last two picks move back to 59 and 60.
And we now have ~300 points again to match the next Academy kid bid.
This has never happened before, but I’m sure this is how it will work.
And then the AFL will probably change the rules to stop such a scenario happening again.
Last year was exceptional because of the suspension of the rule limiting teams to only as many picks as they have list spots so it really could've been in the 100s because they allocated out seven rounds or so, and only became valuable once teams passed on their interim picks. If we could dig up what happened in 2019 and earlier, it would be a better indication.I remember on the FOX footage last year when bids were matched, the picks at the end of the draft given back to teams were listed in the 100s+ (even though there wasn't that number of draft picks). I wonder if once a pick has been used to match, it no longer carries a point value and only becomes "active" when you get to the end of the draft.
Last year was exceptional because of the suspension of the rule limiting teams to only as many picks as they have list spots so it really could've been in the 100s because they allocated out seven rounds or so, and only became valuable once teams passed on their interim picks. If we could dig up what happened in 2019 and earlier, it would be a better indication.
Danny Daly on The Roar Deal > We will be trying to move pick 41 up the order over the next few weeks.... I wasn't aware clubs can still trade picks up until draft night?
Collingwood did this a couple of years ago when they didn’t have enough points to get Quaynor and KellyDanny Daly on The Roar Deal > We will be trying to move pick 41 up the order over the next few weeks.... I wasn't aware clubs can still trade picks up until draft night?
Danny Daly on The Roar Deal > We will be trying to move pick 41 up the order over the next few weeks.... I wasn't aware clubs can still trade picks up until draft night?
Both likely to play VFL next season maybeAlso sounded pretty positive regarding Ashcroft and Fletcher doing some work with the club next season.