Night out at the casino with old mate would be fun. A seagull would probably pinch his wallet before walking in
Well the human seagull in Jake Lloyd has pinched his sanity more than a few times, so it's definitely possible...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Night out at the casino with old mate would be fun. A seagull would probably pinch his wallet before walking in
If i didn't have Witts and Gawn already i would probably bite the bullet as wellI think so. Still think he’s over priced but might just bite the bullet
Ocean’s 13 where they rigged every table and everyone made 500k in a minute. He was at the only table where the magnets didn’t workWell the human seagull in Jake Lloyd has pinched his sanity more than a few times, so it's definitely possible...
Yeah look, lots on the freo board rate him as best 22, so he may hold his spot. I'm not as sold on him though.Damn, thanks for your insight, its annoying because I need a forward less than 400k to get Hardwick in and Stepho out in the same week, and he is the clear winner in terms of average in that group. Good thing I asked
So Treloar attended 8/8 CBA in the 4th quarter whilst Dunkley only went to 1. Is that cause for concern?
Dusty v Dunkley?
Seems Big-O has been ruled out of Thurdays game Grundy could go mega
I'm no punting expert but it seems like some curses just never end. Here are some of my highlights from last weekend....
View attachment 1090425
I ******* already had Cripps 20+ as a leg but obviously forgot about that and added him again for 25+. Of course he doesn't get that.
View attachment 1090427
GWS just suck I guess.
View attachment 1090428
Worpel spontaneously turns into a potato. Seriously what happened to him?
View attachment 1090429
Caldwell and Shiel get injured during the game.
Too ashamed to reveal my stake amounts....
Will try your idea though, single bets on over/under fantasy points markets. Will take unders on who I trade in and overs on who I trade out.
Surely Coll ain't that dumb surely .... oh wait its Coll oh shitOr they could throw Cameron in thinking it's a cake walk and share the Grundy load.....
But you don't lose the 60k unless you trade. It comes down to the ultimate question of "what is the value of a trade" which I've thought about in the past but haven't nailed it down. If you take the price of the winning team at the end of the season, minus the starting price and divide the remainder by 30, you will get a sort of "value" of a what a trade should be worth on average. The probelm is that is hindsight only, but it could be a guide by taking a look at other season. I haven't done it myself but it might be something people should consider looking back at.To me this 'hold underperforming premos' just buys into the sunk cost fallacy. The truth is, you can still move Gaffy sideways to a premo like Dunks, Dusty, Brayshaw or Crisp (heck you could take a punt on Mcgrath or Parish with all their outs) and make some modest money.
Even if Gaff performs well, you lose money, his break even is 159. Most of those other options are making money and are all likely to churn out consistent tons. Some may not have the ceiling of Gaff but they'll make you money in the short term.
Yeah, a sideways trade may well be a 'wasted trade' but if it makes you $60k as opposed to losing $60k, I know I'd do it. Just move him on and if he performs later you can get him cheap like everyone else.
Gaff hasn't even looked capable of scoring 80.
If Bucks has half a brain cell he’ll try to exploit the one advantage they have against a better team.Or they could throw Cameron in thinking it's a cake walk and share the Grundy load.....
That's like saying you don't gain money unless you sell the player.But you don't lose the 60k unless you trade. It comes down to the ultimate question of "what is the value of a trade" which I've thought about in the past but haven't nailed it down. If you take the price of the winning team at the end of the season, minus the starting price and divide the remainder by 30, you will get a sort of "value" of a what a trade should be worth on average. The problem is that is hindsight only, but it could be a guide by taking a look at other season. I haven't done it myself but it might be something people should consider looking back at.
Surely Coll ain't that dumb surely .... oh wait its Coll oh sh*t
Elliot injured injured does open a spot up but i doubt they replace a small with a tall
But you don't lose the 60k unless you trade. It comes down to the ultimate question of "what is the value of a trade" which I've thought about in the past but haven't nailed it down. If you take the price of the winning team at the end of the season, minus the starting price and divide the remainder by 30, you will get a sort of "value" of a what a trade should be worth on average. The probelm is that is hindsight only, but it could be a guide by taking a look at other season. I haven't done it myself but it might be something people should consider looking back at.
Most trades in the first 2-5 rounds are to fix mistakes and probably bring the average down e.g. Danger to DunkleyThat's actually a great idea.
It seems fantasy is quite variable looking back though.
My results:
2018 I was +$6.86M; Rank low 400's.
2019 I was + $5.06M; Rank Mid 3000's
2020 I was + $4.75M. Rank Mid 3000's
If we were to take the average high and low of that our range is ~ = $160,300 - $228,600 per trade.
However we probably make a lot of trades that are 50% higher or lower than those averages to then even out over the year.
So ~ $80k - $310k trades are happening and that evens out to be a touch under $190k per trade.
That actually really helps me on my Gaff decision. At $750k at this stage I would think a total disaster for Gaff might see him dropping down another $150k to $600k. At which point, if he turns his form around I'll want him back. So thats 2x trades for potentially $80k each and not really worth those trades.
Versus Tyson -> Lazzarro. Make $200k (tick). Plus Lazarro will make some money also (double tick).
[
Most trades in the first 2-5 rounds are to fix mistakes and probably bring the average down e.g. Danger to Dunkley
Gaff will be lucky to get 90 this season. Its not a form issue with him, its a new gameplan issue. He no longer gets those easy marks out of D50. They now going to the centre square and he is no where to be seen. I think he I gonna have to change to his way before he gets anywhere close againTrue but wherever possible we want to maximise our cash gen early too. Sideway trading Gaff probably doesnt do that (under the assumption he does in fact return to some 100+ scores... which who knows at this point...)
Gaff will be lucky to get 90 this season. Its not a form issue with him, its a new gameplan issue. He no longer gets those easy marks out of D50. They now going to the centre square and he is no where to be seen. I think he I gonna have to change to his way before he gets anywhere close again
Or they could throw Cameron in thinking it's a cake walk and share the Grundy load.....
How will Fullarton go solo rucking? Could we see a decent points increase?
I think Stewart is losing out from this as well.Gaff will be lucky to get 90 this season. Its not a form issue with him, its a new gameplan issue. He no longer gets those easy marks out of D50. They now going to the centre square and he is no where to be seen. I think he I gonna have to change to his way before he gets anywhere close again
I think Stewart is losing out from this as well.
Will Phillips is finally making his debut this week. Gonna wait a week and then jump right on if he scores over a 70. Anything less, and it's not worth it at a starting price of 266K IMO
Hopefully this doesn't impact Lazarro's place in the sideWill Phillips is finally making his debut this week. Gonna wait a week and then jump right on if he scores over a 70. Anything less, and it's not worth it at a starting price of 266K IMO