Play Nice 2022 Non AFL Crowds/Ratings/Finance/Development thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Interesting that the Opening NRL match Parramatta V Melbourne Storm tonight could only pull 17,000 considering the massive blanket coverage the NRL gets in the Sydney media!

17,000 is a bloody good crowd for the NRL! (albeit about 20% of what we'd expect to see in the opening game of the AFL season)
 
I'd be more surprised if that match got over 20,000.
Unlike footy you gain nothing from being at the ground compared to watching on TV because the action is all in one camera shot. Plus it rains constantly in Sydney so the culture revolves around watching the game at the Leagues club playing pokies rather than going to the game.

This is partly true, but more an entrenched excuse from the Sydney media to explain a lack of care or interest in their product, that they ram down everybody's throat 24/7.

Even the A league and NBL would get bigger crowds if they got the saturation media coverage afforded to the NRL.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Official Crowd for last nights game was 17,301.

Was watching the lions praccy match and flicked it over on half time. Behind the goals at each end, the top level was practically empty. In mid-season this is probably an excellent crowd, but it being the season opener, surely they would've been expecting 20k at least
 
Oh dear!
The NRL match only rated 61,000 in prime time on Ch 9 in Melbourne even with the Storm playing and I wonder how long Ch 9 would put up with such poor results on the main channel in Melbourne?
The 5 capitals figure was only 455,000 as well.

NRL not as popular as the rabid Sydney media would have us believe!
 
I'd be more surprised if that match got over 20,000.
Unlike footy you gain nothing from being at the ground compared to watching on TV because the action is all in one camera shot. Plus it rains constantly in Sydney so the culture revolves around watching the game at the Leagues club playing pokies rather than going to the game.
Sorry but crowds and memberships mean MONEY (hundreds of millions in fact) to the AFL and the clubs which the NRL misses out on massively so don't say maximising crowds doesn't matter!
People sitting on their arse on the couch at home contribute very little to the game.
 
Oh dear!
The NRL match only rated 61,000 in prime time on Ch 9 in Melbourne even with the Storm playing and I wonder how long Ch 9 would put up with such poor results on the main channel in Melbourne?
The 5 capitals figure was only 455,000 as well.

NRL not as popular as the rabid Sydney media would have us believe!

In the middle of Winter, in competition with the AFL, 61k is probably quite good, but at this time of year, when there is literally nothing else on, it's probably slightly below expectation.
Still, I wouldn't describe it as disastrous either, I mean the national A-League FTA numbers are often half that.
NRL FTA numbers are often underwhelming.
Their huge strength remains STV numbers, with Sydney and Brisbane representing the bulk of subscribers (premium subscribers at that).
 
In the middle of Winter, in competition with the AFL, 61k is probably quite good, but at this time of year, when there is literally nothing else on, it's probably slightly below expectation.
Still, I wouldn't describe it as disastrous either, I mean the national A-League FTA numbers are often half that.
NRL FTA numbers are often underwhelming.
Their huge strength remains STV numbers, with Sydney and Brisbane representing the bulk of subscribers (premium subscribers at that).

That's 60k into Melbourne though where they promoted the hell out of the game, it had no competition and was on the main channel. Plus it looks like a close game.

With the crowd, Parra v Melbourne would be equivalent of say Carlton v Sydney as a season opener. So yeah shithouse crowd.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I'm glad the RL urgers are happy with the 2023 opening round total of 147,735.

Obviously they are quite happy to run a very poor second to the AFL juggernaut when it comes to crowds and memberships.
It will take only two AFL opening round matches to get much more than 147,735 and will easily double the NRL total!
 
I'm glad the RL urgers are happy with the 2023 opening round total of 147,735.

Obviously they are quite happy to run a very poor second to the AFL juggernaut when it comes to crowds and memberships.
It will take only two AFL opening round matches to get much more than 147,735 and will easily double the NRL total!

Christ this is tiresome.

The AFL is an outlier in Australian Sport. Rugby league is doing better for itself, and slowly but surely coming to the same point the AFL is. Rome isnt built in a day.
 
I'm glad the RL urgers are happy with the 2023 opening round total of 147,735.

Obviously they are quite happy to run a very poor second to the AFL juggernaut when it comes to crowds and memberships.
It will take only two AFL opening round matches to get much more than 147,735 and will easily double the NRL total!

Decent for a bush league comp.
 
The NRL's subscription ratings have exploded with cheap Kayo.

I used to think that the AFL's emphasis on Free to Air rather than Pay led to higher aggregate ratings but I think its the reverse now.

More NRL fans now have access to all eight weekly games and having spent the money on a Foxtel/Kayo subscription they are more inclined to watch them.

The last Roy Morgan surveys (from 2019-20) showed that more than 1.5m Australians watched AFL matches than NRL matches but I reckon NRL fans are just watching more of theirs than what ours are of ours.

The shorter game time helps but the key reason I consider is that all of the NRL fans are heavily incentivised to buy the subscription services to see their own team each week with a large number of their team's matches exclusive to Foxtel/Kayo. A possible exception to that are Broncos fans who get a lot of games on FTA.

In contrast, the bulk of the fans of 8 of the 18 AFL clubs enjoy all their team's matches in their home market on FTA (albeit a small number on delay) and would be far less likely to be subscribers.
 
The NRL's subscription ratings have exploded with cheap Kayo.

I used to think that the AFL's emphasis on Free to Air rather than Pay led to higher aggregate ratings but I think its the reverse now.

More NRL fans now have access to all eight weekly games and having spent the money on a Foxtel/Kayo subscription they are more inclined to watch them.

The last Roy Morgan surveys (from 2019-20) showed that more than 1.5m Australians watched AFL matches than NRL matches but I reckon NRL fans are just watching more of theirs than what ours are of ours.

The shorter game time helps but the key reason I consider is that all of the NRL fans are heavily incentivised to buy the subscription services to see their own team each week with a large number of their team's matches exclusive to Foxtel/Kayo. A possible exception to that are Broncos fans who get a lot of games on FTA.

In contrast, the bulk of the fans of 8 of the 18 AFL clubs enjoy all their team's matches in their home market on FTA (albeit a small number on delay) and would be far less likely to be subscribers.

It's overwhelmingly the shorter game time. A greater share of NRL fans would have a fox / kayo subscription but there would still be more fans primarily getting foxtel / kayo for AFL than for NRL. You would expect AFL and NRL fans with kayo would, on average, watch a similar amount of game time each weekend skewed towards prime time.

Even with the longer game time the AFL more often than not gets higher averages on Thursdays and Fridays and certainly finals. The average ratings obviously take a massive hit when you have games starting at 1 to 130 on Saturdays and Sundays and there are 8 3 hour games in total on those days (when there's no Thursdays night games)

What I just discovered is that the NRL has shifted its 2pm Sunday game to 6pm....presumably part of the new TV deal. The fixture is now even more heavily calibrated to foxtel's benefit. Not going to help much with the TV money though
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top