Opinion 2022 Player X vs Y vs Z

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Just a toss of the coin. Should end up with both anyway.

Thing is for those with Miller & Rowell, will they catch COVID while in Perth?
Not sure about those two specifically, but I think most of the sun's have had it. The CEO was quoted about a month ago saying over 2/3 of the list had had it.
 
Cripps + JHF/Ward
vs
Rowell + JBerry


Pick 2: Hinge, Gibcus and Sinn*


Steele vs Oliver


Soligo vs CStephens*




*obviously as long as they're picked in the starting 22
 
Cripps + JHF/Ward
vs
Rowell + JBerry


Pick 2: Hinge, Gibcus and Sinn*


Steele vs Oliver


Soligo vs CStephens*




*obviously as long as they're picked in the starting 22
Rowell and Berry
Hinge and Sinn, if not named, Gibcus
Steele (have him behind only Macrae, Touk)
Soligo, but I wouldn't be picking him, likely out for Laird
Darcy & Crisp
Vs
Gawn & Ridley
Gawn and Ridley
I was done with my team, but now I have to trade Sicily out :mad:

So Dusty vs JDG
Dusty
M.Crouch v Neale
Neale by the length of the Flemington
 
Neale is 100k more, priced at a 99 avg, would say target is 120 avg
Crouch is priced at an 88 avg, would say target is 110 avg
Is Neale really that less risky?
 
Neale is 100k more, priced at a 99 avg, would say target is 120 avg
Crouch is priced at an 88 avg, would say target is 110 avg
Is Neale really that less risky?
Neale is in 53% of teams.
Crouch is in 5%

That's where the risk is. If he goes well you're behind all those teams.

110+ is the goal for Neale imo. More is a bonus, but it doesn't really matter as all the top teams will have him.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Neale is in 53% of teams.
Crouch is in 5%

That's where the risk is. If he goes well you're behind all those teams.

110+ is the goal for Neale imo. More is a bonus, but it doesn't really matter as all the top teams will have him.
Okay so 110+ is the goal for both, but Crouch is 100k cheaper. From a cash gen perspective, Crouch avging 10ppg less than Neale is breakeven relatively (and roughly) speaking, given they are priced 10ppg apart.

From a keeper perspective, they arguably have a similar risk reward profile if their goals are 110+ avg, albeit Neale has a historically higher ceiling and 2021 games behind him, but POD is an advantage in this case imo
 
Okay so 110+ is the goal for both, but Crouch is 100k cheaper. From a cash gen perspective, Crouch avging 10ppg less than Neale is breakeven relatively (and roughly) speaking, given they are priced 10ppg apart.

From a keeper perspective, they arguably have a similar risk reward profile if their goals are 110+ avg, albeit Neale has a historically higher ceiling and 2021 games behind him, but POD is an advantage in this case imo
Being a POD in not having Neale is definitely not an advantage
 
Okay so 110+ is the goal for both, but Crouch is 100k cheaper. From a cash gen perspective, Crouch avging 10ppg less than Neale is breakeven relatively (and roughly) speaking, given they are priced 10ppg apart.

From a keeper perspective, they arguably have a similar risk reward profile if their goals are 110+ avg, albeit Neale has a historically higher ceiling and 2021 games behind him, but POD is an advantage in this case imo
Both are keepers so cash gen is not important.

Neale has gone 110+ 4 times (and 109) Crouch twice (both 110).

Crouch is a much bigger injury risk.

Neale is a captain option, Crouch is not.

Each to their own though, stick to your guns if you are sure :thumbsu:
 
Crisp & Josh Kelly vs Whitfield & Bontempelli
Both great options, don't think you can go wrong, unless injury screws you over

Whitfield and Bont for me, higher ceiling I reckon

Whitfield and Parish or Jelly and use the cash elsewhere?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top