Your right, leave as is.Love your post, but OMac is already a rookie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Your right, leave as is.Love your post, but OMac is already a rookie.
Akuei is a Cat B rookie having come through our zone. Who would you have taken instead?We need to tidy a lot up on our list, project players on a reduced sized list in a premiership contender is not on. Mirkov and Akuei should be on our reserves list, not AFL, players who can't play AFL when fit is not good for us.
Former first-round picks, Plugger's nephew among early MSD nominations
Former first-round picks Sam Durdin and Matt Ling are among the early group to nominate for the Mid-Season Draftwww.afl.com.au
OMac not fit; breaking.BREAKING: OMac not fit.
Isn’t Sam Durdin already playing for us…?
Do we really need an undersized ruck/forward right now? or best available Ruckman and a back up KPF?
Think once Pittonet comes back or we get a ready to go Ruck, TDK becomes the Ruck/CHF we need...
With his improved marking he could become elite at this role...
Bingo. Can change an entire playing groups aspect if a player is not treated right.Culture. That’s why. Culture. Be loyal to your playing group. This would be an * style s*** stain move that doesn’t pass the pub test.
Nothing is black and white. All come down to how the situation is handled.Bingo. Can change an entire playing groups aspect if a player is not treated right.
Akuei is a Cat B rookie having come through our zone. Who would you have taken instead?
As for contenders not taking project players, not sure how much Melbourne’s 2 mid season picks last year hindered their premiership aspirations.
I'm glad Cricket Australia didn't have this stance with their current captain. Same issues, took years to get right.Hang on, wasn't OMac delisted by Melbourne? Can't have been rated that highly then, considering he was only young (24). Either that, or they knew his back was cooked. Can't compare him to C Curnow, he's never been in that league. Yes yes, Melbourne have much more KPP depth that we do/did, but if OMac was really that valuable someone would have traded for him, and no club wanted to. I wouldn't have thought any other club would be regretting that decision, after his 3 games in 2 years for us.
All in all, just don't think we have the luxury of keeping all these guys on the list that never play, we already have Marchy and McGovern for that purpose, and realistically he's the least likely of the 3 to every come good (which says a lot). Not wanting to sound like a campaigner and honestly I feel for OMac but we have to be pragmatic here. Sometimes things don't work out. Life is like that.
Charlie Curnow went to one specific Doctor Who was a ''bone/ fracture'' specialist[ who got the knee cured after the other orthopaedic surgeons left it vulnerable/ ].... ID be wanting similar medical input for OMac from the best specialist whether it was possible to make a full recovery before letting him off the list /rookie list..... And I'm only saying this because he is so versatile... Playing key forward or key back or in the ruck.... And in the preseason he did look surprisingly capable ...When fit & firingHang on, wasn't OMac delisted by Melbourne? Can't have been rated that highly then, considering he was only young (24). Either that, or they knew his back was cooked. Can't compare him to C Curnow, he's never been in that league. Yes yes, Melbourne have much more KPP depth that we do/did, but if OMac was really that valuable someone would have traded for him, and no club wanted to. I wouldn't have thought any other club would be regretting that decision, after his 3 games in 2 years for us.
All in all, just don't think we have the luxury of keeping all these guys on the list that never play, we already have Marchy and McGovern for that purpose, and realistically he's the least likely of the 3 to every come good (which says a lot). Not wanting to sound like a campaigner and honestly I feel for OMac but we have to be pragmatic here. Sometimes things don't work out. Life is like that.
I wasn’t suggesting that or isolating that example. I was merely generally speaking, I.e as others had mentioned DelucaNothing is black and white. All come down to how the situation is handled.
Putting a player on the inactive list doesn't necessarily mean you are treating them poorly. No one suggested that.
On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Not a good comparison. CA don't have a salary cap or squad limits. They can afford to give players years to come good from injury with little to no consequence.'m glad Cricket Australia didn't have this stance with their current captain. Same issues, took years to get right.
Depth players need to be available now, not in the future.
OMac might need to have a year in vfl to prove his fitness/durability and then can be reconsidered.
There are others out there who could doing this role on field.
No, they don't.I have no issues with Akuei and Mirkov but the appropriateness of their recruitment really must be questioned. If we could have picked players who could have provided senior depth and signed them up to the Carlton Reserves list then that would have been the right thing to do.
it's hard but players are assets - if the potential upside is worth the wait then you wait but your understudies have to be ready to step in or they aren't doing the job and taking up a valuable list spotDepth players need to be available now, not in the future.
OMac might need to have a year in vfl to prove his fitness/durability and then can be reconsidered.
There are others out there who could doing this role on field.
This is showing a fair degree of ignorance with regards to Akuei.I haven't followed the available options but having players on your list who are unable to play senior football for not one year but probably 3 at least makes it difficult and we have two of them. To answer that question, if anyone decent gets picked in the mid season draft then them.
This makes it a bigger issue for us because list sizes are smaller and we are carrying a number of players who we know are at high risk of being injured and out long term or are already injured and out long term. McDonald, McGovern, Marchbank and Curnow are 4 players with an extensive injury history who going into this season you would consider likely to break down and miss the season or significant portions of it. 3 of them already have. You already have Honey, Marchbank and Cuningham recovering from long term injuries. Then there is Jones who before the draft we had to know we were going to lose. That's 7 players who could easily miss the season or most of it. Fortunately Curnow has been ok but 6 of them have not. You recruit two more players who will be unable to play senior footy. There's an issue here with the state of our list with a large potion of it being unavailable to play senior footy and we should not be surprised.
For where our list is in regards to long term injuries and the amount of high risk players on it, you have to question the decision to willingly add more players to it who will be unable to play senior football.
I have no issues with Akuei and Mirkov but the appropriateness of their recruitment really must be questioned. If we could have picked players who could have provided senior depth and signed them up to the Carlton Reserves list then that would have been the right thing to do.
We are a few injuries away from being premiership contenders or bailed out of finals in the first match or two.
I don't know whether better options could have been taken on board but if they were then then I think we have made a mistake. If we didn't have so many high risk players, Jones and a few long term injuries then I would feel more comfortable taking project players as I would if the list sizes were increased.