Jen2310
Premium Platinum
So now thats confirned; 3 players are vying for the last spot?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Looks like.So now thats confirned; 3 players are vying for the last spot?
He only does it because he sees us as incompetent. It’s hard to argueDodoro is such a greedy prick. A future first for sliding back one spot.
maybe time to take the blinkers off.......he does it to every Club he's able to, and that's his job (still a greedy prick)........but did we slide back?He only does it because he sees us as incompetent. It’s hard to argue
I definitely suspect someone like dodoro views gc as a target he can extract maximum value from. Not necessarily due to incompetence. But because we value draft picks differently for a host of reasons.maybe time to take the blinkers off.......he does it to every Club he's able to, and that's his job (still a greedy prick)........but did we slide back?
Only looking at it from the outside but he appears to have one of the biggest egos in the AFL, and that’s saying something.maybe time to take the blinkers off.......he does it to every Club he's able to, and that's his job (still a greedy prick)........but did we slide back?
Yikes
Yikes
Mind you $750k to buy pick 1 and Harley Reid…
Cheap as chips
Giants still worse offMind you $750k to buy pick 1 and Harley Reid…
Cheap as chips
Can see all of GWS, WC and North finishing below Hawthorn. Gunston the biggest lose for the Hawks.Giants still worse off
I don't know, there both not ideal.Everyone surely realises it’s in hawthorns best interest to pay Mitchell and o’meara so they can achieve the required salary floor and avoid overpaying duds and youngsters.
It’s not ‘bad’ at all.
It would be far worse having to pay 600k to a 3rd year player like we’ve been guilty of previously.
I doubt Suns did that. 400K, yes.It would be far worse having to pay 600k to a 3rd year player like we’ve been guilty of previously.
Wasn't it said that both Rankine and Lukosius were on 600k or there aboutI doubt Suns did that. 400K, yes.
Look at Hawthorn's list.I don't know, there both not ideal.
Freeing up a large amount of cap space also has its advantages say should a gun young mid with family ties to them want to move back to MelbourneEveryone surely realises it’s in hawthorns best interest to pay Mitchell and o’meara so they can achieve the required salary floor and avoid overpaying duds and youngsters.
It’s not ‘bad’ at all.
It would be far worse having to pay 600k to a 3rd year player like we’ve been guilty of previously.
Look at Hawthorn's list.
How many players they have that are worth 500K? Sicily.. and.. no one else?
If I was Hawthorn, in their current situation, I would much rather be paying my current listed players what they are actually worth ie. 200 - 400k for majority of their list rather than putting them on 500k+ contracts they don't deserve.
They are reserving so much cap space. By paying 750k to players on another team they are effectively paying only 90% of the cap, rather than the compulsory 95% - such an advantage for a crap team. Will allow them to recover so much quicker.
Think how much they will be able to offer Noah and other guys coming out of contract in the next few years if their youngsters are paid what they are worth rather than enforced inflated contracts.
Of course, I'd rather a better team.. but this is the right off-field concept in rebuilding a young team IMO. Although, I think they cut too deep for midfield experience which will hurt them a fair bit of on field development IMO.
This can work both ways. Sure they have a lot of salary spare for next year to try and get a gun or two in (we're all concerned about Anderson) but if they don't then they will be forced to pay their list cloggers overs and/or front end deals.Look at Hawthorn's list.
How many players they have that are worth 500K? Sicily.. and.. no one else?
If I was Hawthorn, in their current situation, I would much rather be paying my current listed players what they are actually worth ie. 200 - 400k for majority of their list rather than putting them on 500k+ contracts they don't deserve.
They are reserving so much cap space. By paying 750k to players on another team they are effectively paying only 90% of the cap, rather than the compulsory 95% - such an advantage for a crap team. Will allow them to recover so much quicker.
Think how much they will be able to offer Noah and other guys coming out of contract in the next few years if their youngsters are paid what they are worth rather than enforced inflated contracts.
Of course, I'd rather a better team.. but this is the right off-field concept in rebuilding a young team IMO. Although, I think they cut too deep for midfield experience which will hurt them a fair bit of on field development IMO.
Yeah. By paying o’meara and Mitchell this year they’re just pushing back the requirement to make a decision on these things.This can work both ways. Sure they have a lot of salary spare for next year to try and get a gun or two in (we're all concerned about Anderson) but if they don't then they will be forced to pay their list cloggers overs and/or front end deals.
Too soon! HahahahahahaWe copped a bit of s**t for the Bowes trade
But the USA just traded an international arms dealer to Russia for a WNBA player and Russia kept their future picks too