A pristine argument? I don't have one of them.Brayshaw goes alright in the guts. Always think there needs to be a pretty pristine argument for moving a player out of a position they are dominating.
We lost a winger who despite him being unpopular was a pretty handy player. Long term we need to find a replacement, especially while O'Driscoll is still in development. We also lost Cerra whose skill set may have been a fit. The result is a slight imbalance in out best 23 make up.
The only actual options we have, meaning players who don't need to learn the role, include Aish and Colyer, with Aish the only best 23 option. I'm fine with Aish there, but I like his around the ground diversity. To me is an effective role player rather than a threat.
We do have other options which in time may fill the position.
Brayshaw has played the wing position in his development period and is our best 2 way runner. Brayshaw on the wing is a threat.
Currently inside mid is a list strength for us and Brayshaw can be covered around the clearances. When the ball is in general play his role may be at the throw ins, bounce downs and ball ups.
Assuming inside mid is where Fyfe plays we probably have too many. Alternative positions for Fyfe, Serong and Brodie are a little unconvincing, whereas for Brayshaw and O'Meara they seem plausible.
If I had read that Worner and Henry had killed the time trials, fine. Wagner has a preseason to enhance his credentials. Long term maybe Johnson.