Totally agree.Just get me the mother f***ing Wizard. Welcome Wato!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Totally agree.Just get me the mother f***ing Wizard. Welcome Wato!
I don't think we need Wato. First 2 picks Caddy, then Delean. I'm happy with Sheez, Hansen Jnr, Spicer, Drury, & Harvey as our small fwds.Just get me the mother f***ing Wizard. Welcome Wato!
Agree the forward line looks killer, but the defence would be even more of a mess than it is now.If we got pick 3 compo for McKay then drafting Wizard Watson and Caddy would really round out our forward group.
Tall - Larkey, Comben, CCJ, Caddy
Mid - Zurhaar, Curtis, Stevo, George
Small - Watson, Hansen Jr, Harvey, Drury
Thats 12 deep of a pretty solid mix of players for the AFL and VFL sides.
We then have Sheezel, Thomas and Ford as options, and even Simpkin might end up forward more often. And Goldy/Xerri moving down from ruck.
I don't think we need Wato. First 2 picks Caddy, then Delean. I'm happy with Sheez, Hansen Jnr, Spicer, Drury, & Harvey as our small fwds.
Absolutely shocked how Shaun Mannagh and Kye Declase is not on an afl listClear best player in the VFL. Like by a mile, one AFL club will be very lucky. Could see him becoming an Alex Neal-Bullen (who was a crucial cog to Melbourne’s premiership and a solid contributor to this day)
Sure, we could also pursue salary dumps or use our future first to trade into this draft for O'Sullivan or Curtin. Or we might get priority picks.Agree the forward line looks killer, but the defence would be even more of a mess than it is now.
We'd still need to find ready-to-go replacements for Mckay and Ziebell too.
Maybe Tomlinson with a third rounder and Port's 1st for Bergman/Ash/Clark?
Or Dylan Williams as a UFA?
yep i dont disagree i just think we have enough sub 178cm players so why get another. Also I agree sheez isnt a small fwd but he does play like one.That's putting a lot of faith in 4 young players with no valid claims of having proven themselves as small forwards at the top level. And Sheezel is not a dedicated small forward by any traditional definition.
Can't trade ports first back to them for Bergman.. you can't return picksAgree the forward line looks killer, but the defence would be even more of a mess than it is now.
We'd still need to find ready-to-go replacements for Mckay and Ziebell too.
Maybe Tomlinson with a third rounder and Port's 1st for Bergman/Ash/Clark?
Or Dylan Williams as a UFA?
I thought this too. Then someone said you can in different trade periods. Might be a vibe/ask the afl type of rule again.Can't trade ports first back to them for Bergman.. you can't return picks
Yep, tho we could swing a pick trade with the pies or some such.Can't trade ports first back to them for Bergman.. you can't return picks
Not a BOG performance by any means, but the blueprint is there.
Some may wonder why a clip of contested work with mixed results is leading to a guy being in the discussion for pick #2, but a guy with his pace and height doing that is pretty special.
Once you add in the context of some of the X-factor that he has shown on the outside in other games, I think he starts to look like a pretty special player. The type of player that even his doubters wouldn't be shocked if he ends up being the best player from this draft. If he keeps on improving he'll be playing for us next year.
Partly because of JFHF but also because eggs and baskets, I'd be against loading up for pick #1 just to get Reid. But my draftee knowledge is superficial at best.
Souup roos_fanatic08 or Sphynx would any of you even contemplate shedding multiple first round picks just to move to the coveted #1 position for Reid?
Not even with a receipt?Can't trade ports first back to them for Bergman.. you can't return picks
Yeah, port have a one year return policy.Not even with a receipt?
I figure we won’t get most of that trade back, but at least if we can most of him, it ruins it for PortYeah, port have a one year return policy.
Future credits?I figure we won’t get most of that player back, but at least if we can most of him, it ruins it for Port
Gift voucher to the value of half a 1st round pickFuture credits?
Thanks, the mystery is revealed.It's numbered the picks based on where clubs finished last year. That's why we've got pick 1, and Port's pick that they traded to us is pick 8 because they finished 11th. They won't finish 11th.
Because none of them have elite pace (used effectively) or pull goals out of their backside?yep i dont disagree i just think we have enough sub 178cm players so why get another. Also I agree sheez isnt a small fwd but he does play like one.
I think we’d need to have a serious look at edwards, on the basis that it’s a sound investment in future returns from one of the WA clubs if he is to go home.
Look at what Jackson has netted Melbourne, plus if WCE can’t pull off a trade for English they would come hard
From highlights I see the same, it’s more Hodge less Judd.Maybe I'm the only one... but what am I missing with Harley Reid?
Kicking depth, class - don't really see much evidence of them. Haven't watched too much yet to be fair.
He's strong and tough amongst his peers but can't see the the metres gained of a Dangerfield, Martin ..or JFHF.. in his game.
Most probably wrong just an initial observation.