sataris
Chief Toastie Officer
- Feb 15, 2015
- 10,694
- 21,690
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Dont you just want someone to sit the ball on Moores head and watched a +100kg player take him out. Id also love to see that same +100kg player attempt a smother (and touch the ball so all is legal) and absolutely smash Maynard..View attachment 2036935
Bad luck follows Darcy Moore. Another player accidentally taken out by a football accident from one of his knees.
Do you ever post anything else
Harry appreciation posts, Lewis Young trade requests and corporate tax avoidance skullduggery.Do you ever post anything else
Harry appreciation posts, Lewis Young trade requests and corporate tax avoidance skullduggery.
All quality content.
Completely different !This is John Coleman
This is how you use your knee to protect and lift
This is not REMOTELY close the Darcy Moores’ actions.
View attachment 2037713
One incident is an accident, two is deliberate. If ye knows what he's doing and especially after petraccas injury, I'm not sure you can claim its not deliberate.I like Darcy Moore. I don't think he is deliberately trying to go out there to injure opponents. It's something he's naturally doing that he needs to change.
Calls for players to run through him etc are a bit tasteless imo.
How many years has he been playing and how often has it happened? Jury is out methinks.One incident is an accident, two is deliberate. If ye knows what he's doing and especially after petraccas injury, I'm not sure you can claim its not deliberate.
Isn't that more a case for it being deliberate than just part of his marking action?How many years has he been playing and how often has it happened? Jury is out methinks.
Interesting that when Parker bumped that fella in the VFL (He didn't go high and had his back to him) the media was making claims that Parker was frustrated and his frustration resulted in that 'illegal bump' (thought it was more of a strong block personally)One incident is an accident, two is deliberate. If ye knows what he's doing and especially after petraccas injury, I'm not sure you can claim its not deliberate.
Well we disagree then mate.One incident is an accident, two is deliberate. If ye knows what he's doing and especially after petraccas injury, I'm not sure you can claim its not deliberate.
This is John Coleman
This is how you use your knee to protect and lift
This is not REMOTELY close the Darcy Moores’ actions.
View attachment 2037713
Surely after knowing what Petracca is going though, would you not feel a little bit hesitant about how you go about it for a whileI like Darcy Moore. I don't think he is deliberately trying to go out there to injure opponents. It's something he's naturally doing that he needs to change.
Calls for players to run through him etc are a bit tasteless imo.
He’s 203cm and a 100kg. It’s a lot of power through his knee when he (legally) puts the knee into a players back to get the leverage to spoil.I like Darcy Moore. I don't think he is deliberately trying to go out there to injure opponents. It's something he's naturally doing that he needs to change.
Calls for players to run through him etc are a bit tasteless imo.
A compelling counterpoint.Well we disagree then mate.
You would have thought so.Surely after knowing what Petracca is going though, would you not feel a little bit hesitant about how you go about it for a while
I'm not here to debate with you SM. Simply to state my opinion & add to the discussion (not "debate")... If you disagree that's fine. I really don't see any need to reply any further.A compelling counterpoint.
I'm not here to debate with you SM. Simply to state my opinion & add to the discussion (not "debate")... If you disagree that's fine. I really don't see any need to reply any further.
IMO not everything needs to be a debate or argument... People are aloud to just discuss stuff on here mate.
* gasp *
My point was actually that you weren't 'discussing'. Essentially saying "I think this and I don't care what you say" isn't a discussion, it's actually the definition of the opposite. Which is fine, you do you, but engaging me and replying to me only to essentially say you have no interest in discussing the issue makes your involvement in the discussion rather redundant. Call it a debate, argument, or discussion, it's really the same thing. To say you want to discuss but not debate something is a distinction without a difference.