OH FFS Bro, you gon have to include the punchline in these shit tags.
Man, I am so tired of this shit, so tired.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
OH FFS Bro, you gon have to include the punchline in these shit tags.
Man, I am so tired of this shit, so tired.
11 please. Need him to get to 100.Lynch is more likely to play 2 than 20. Gibcus & Bauer too. Will be plenty of games to go around.
Will take 3 years at this rate11 please. Need him to get to 100.
We've got the Ssssserpent nowWill take 3 years at this rate
I watched vic-metro v vic-country last night .. after watching it I wouldn’t be giving up 2 first rounders to move to pick2 …. No chance.Spot on.
Blair is on record saying it a very even draft and we've already knocked back a pick swap for no.3 in the Baker trade. It's 100/1 that we trade up unless the deal is so one sided Kornehole wants the AFL to step in and take over Norf.
6 & 18 is not happening. 6 & 24 for 2 & F2 is the ball park we are talking to get Blairs interest.
Let's be optimistic about North's performance in 2025. They're not finishing higher than bottom 6 (Us, them, Eagles, Dees, Dons, Saints). Adelaide improved their list massively, as did GC. Dons, Dees, Saints all did nothing or are going backwards. So best case scenario for North, they're finishing in 13th with pick 6, 24, 42, etc, in 2025.
North were willing to trade F1 (2-6) for 13 during trade period.
As I've said all along, it should be 6 and 18 for 2 and F2 (20-24).
Then just need to trade 23/24 this year for Essendon/Melbourne's F1, and one of Essendon's later picks this year. 40, 46, 53, 54, 65 are what they'll have left after matching Kako.
1 - Lalor
2 - FOS
10 - Travaglia
11 - Lindsay
20 - Hannaford
23 - Faull
46 - Davidson
Leaves space for 2 PSD/Rookie/SSP
2025: 1, 2-6, 19, 24, 55 (Kellaway F/S), 73
46 will be 38 ish
Lions 27, 32, 42, 43
GC 39, 41
Bombers 28, 31 maybe 40
Blues 38 maybe
I personally hope we target some slides into 30s with last couple of picks as there will be some excellent talent around (where are Jaques, Oliver, Ough, Davis, sims etc… gone go?) while strengthening next years hand.
If. Ryan, Miller & Sonsie average 10+ games next season we are screwed.Lets do the maths. Broad Balta Vlastuin, Gibcus HRS Toranto Ross Short Campbell Nank Lynch MRJ Banks Mansell Clark Brown and hopefully Bauer should all do on average 20+ games. Hopper Prestia Miller Kosi Trezise Macaulif Smith Blight Grey Green and Fawcett/Lafau Ryan and Sonsi will probably play on average 10+ games. That would leave 80 games to be shared across all the whole season for all the draftees.. If we bring in a couple of ready to go kids like FOS and Davidson from our VFL then some of our draftees will miss out. These kids high pick kids are going to need game time to develop so, yes, it is possible to pick 7 but I still think that 5 would be better especially if we trade up to get Norths pick and trade out a couple of picks for future picks.
That maybe true but we also have 8 picks inside 24 so if he said anything else it would weaken those picksBlair is a no BS type of guy. If he is saying its even then its even. Its also consistent with what every other club is saying.
I am not.
In a normal draft i would agree 100% on this ^For me, I'd rather pick 2 over pick 6 and 18.
I don't think it would have ended up as just pick 13 though. I think that's disingenuous to say when the trade never eventuated. They probably would have asked for 13 and a future first rounder.North were willing to trade F1 (2-6) for 13 during trade period.
Apparently it was going to be 13/29 for future 1stI don't think it would have ended up as just pick 13 though. I think that's disingenuous to say when the trade never eventuated. They probably would have asked for 13 and a future first rounder.
Everything you said I'm okay with, I just don't think we get anything else back if we trade 6 and 18 for 2.
Rumour was they were offering F1 + something extra for it. But that was to get a 2 x AA player on the cheap so it's bit different from trading for an unknown commodity.I don't think it would have ended up as just pick 13 though. I think that's disingenuous to say when the trade never eventuated. They probably would have asked for 13 and a future first rounder.
Everything you said I'm okay with, I just don't think we get anything else back if we trade 6 and 18 for 2.
Apparently it was going to be 13/29 for future 1st
Norf fan thinks they were getting more than 13 for F1Rumour was they were offering F1 + something extra for it. But that was to get a 2 x AA player on the cheap so it's bit different from trading for an unknown commodity.
Omg...Apparently it was going to be 13/29 for future 1st
Well considering the deal the North fan said is still horrendous I'm inclined to believe themNorf fan thinks they were getting more than 13 for F1
Neutral fan thinks they were giving more than F1 for 13
Who to believe?
I heard mine on trade radio so probably not meNorf fan thinks they were getting more than 13 for F1
Neutral fan thinks they were giving more than F1 for 13
Who to believe?
Would have worked out to be F1 for Houston though. Really don't think they were trying to trade an F1 for 13 & 29 to just use the picks.Well considering the deal the North fan said is still horrendous I'm inclined to believe them
Norf fan thinks they were getting more than 13 for F1
Neutral fan thinks they were giving more than F1 for 13
Who to believe?
Part of the reason why I'm against trading out is that I don't believe we're going to get the type of deal that people would be happy with. Trading 6 & 18 for just 2 coming back isn't a good deal for us, given our list has more holes than a block of Swiss cheese.So many inequitable trades being proposed lately.
Seems people have a big ego after the trade period and think we are the kings of the universe.
Yes we have some leverage but that doesn't counteract the notion of being reasonable.
Temper your expectations.