List Mgmt. 2024 Draft - Post Trade Period Edition

[Aristotle Pickett]

M

So he’s saying the guy who played midfield all year doesn’t move like a midfielder??

By putting Lindsay and Travaglia ahead of them is he saying despite them only hoping to move into midfield they move better?

It’s strange that with no new form or information the espn guy has dropped a smillie behind Lindsay and Travaglia for such a flimsy reason especially with plenty of evidence of Smillie playing midfield.

He can't play full time mid and can't mark.

 

[Infamy]

C4[2]Yo`DooR mentioned crows met with Lalor again today.

Maybe he isnt locked in at no1 afterall???

Just doing their due diligence to cover off any potential outcome I'd imagine

 

[tiger_tough]

C4[2]Yo`DooR mentioned crows met with Lalor again today.

Maybe he isnt locked in at no1 afterall???

Prob in case they get pick 2 bruzz.

edit. What they said ^

 

[C4[2]Yo`DooR]

Makes sense, although there are still some reports where lalor slides.

That’s a good point too.

 

[_RT_]

C4[2]Yo`DooR mentioned crows met with Lalor again today.

Maybe he isnt locked in at no1 afterall???

Jagga Smith

 

[tigerfan1961]

Because we're not the ones desperate to deal, so if we're going to do anything with them, that helps them solve their own mess, then it should only be in a way where we benefit greatly. If not then take the picks we currently have to the draft, get the best 7 players we can and auction off 24 to the highest bidder and stockpile picks for 2025.

Absolutely right, we don’t need to help North at all. They made their bed and can lie in it. Unless any deal favours RFC, then

 

[bc27]

If we take FOS st kilda will instantly make a trade for norths pick 2 and take Lalor


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

Ok, then Tigers instantly take Tauru @ pick 6 and that trade won’t happen.

 

[of unsound mind]

Richmond 1- sam lalor
N.melbourne 2 - Finn O'Sullivan
Brisbane 3 - Levi Ashcroft
Carlton 4- syd Draper
Adelaide 5- Josh Smillie
Melbourne 6- harvey Langford
Richmond 7- Alex tauru
Gold Coast 8- leo Lombard
Saint Kilda 9'-jagga Smith
Saint Kilda 10- Toby Travaglia
Essendon 11- Isaac kakko
Melbourne 12- harry armstrong
Richmond 13- joe Berry
Richmond 14- Xavier Lindsay
West coast 15- bo Allan
Port power 16- l.trainor
Fremantle 17- t.hotton
Gws giants 18- c hynes
Gws giants 19 -m.reid
Bulldogs 20- j dattoli
Richmond 21 trade to Saint Kilda for future first and pick 32
Saint Kilda 21- jonty faull
Sydney 22- m. Whitlock
Richmond 23- j.whitlock
gws giants 24- j. Shanahan
Sydney 25- h.oliver
Pick 26 Richmond trade to Adelaide for future first
Adelaide 26- a Dodson
Richmond 27- o hannaford
Bulldogs 28- j alger
West coast 29- k.gerryn
Port power- 30- a Clarke
Fremantle 31- Hamish Davis
Richmond 32- James barrat
-------------------------------------------------
In summary
Richmond get
1'- sam lalor
7- Alex tauru
13- joe Berry
14- Xavier Lindsay
23' - j whitlock
27- o hannaford
32- James barrat

Solid picks for except Tauru, but some love him. Add in two F1s it’s highway robbery.

 

[prodigy]

At what cost though?

The suggestion that started this discussion was trading out 6 & 18/20/23 for 2. We give up 2 top 20 talents for 1 that is only marginally better than the player we'd get at 6 and is even lesser value when combined with the 2nd player we'd lose access to at the later pick that will more likely than not be addressing an area of need like KPP/Ruck/Outside Mid/Small Forward

I think in any draft, no matter what, you're more likely to pick a potential superstar in the first few pics.
We need the talismans we can build the club around. We need the players who will make fans want to go to the footy.

Sure, this year we could find that at 6 and pick up a nice player late in the first round but I'd much rather we go balls to the wall and try and pluck out two blue chip potential superstars at 1 and 2.
That type of move brings eyes to the club and gets fans through the turnstiles.

 

[Ctl]

the only thing the crows can offer to move up from pick 4 to pick 2 is a future 3rd or pick 64. Optically for north it looks like less of a reach selecting tauru at 4 instead of 2 though

 

[Ctl]

 

[Drunken Wookie]

You really dont get it do you ?

Its not about if he can still play footy its about will he be allowed to play if he cops another 3 concussions in the next 3-4-5 years. The rules are changing and the AFL will only get harder on these issue's

Brayshaw can still play footy but it gets to a point where liability is way too much of a risk
I see this as the biggest concern with Trainor

Yeah but if every team has that same view its effectively ruling him out of a footy career is what I'm saying. If he's cleared by medicos I see the risk reward being in our favour if it's one of our later picks.

 

[THE_GUN]

Yeah but if every team has that same view its effectively ruling him out of a footy career is what I'm saying. If he's cleared by medicos I see the risk reward being in our favour if it's one of our later picks.

Thats why a player like Trainor that was meant to be a top 10 talent will most likely go outside of top 20

 

[Drunken Wookie]

Thats why a player like Trainor that was meant to be a top 10 talent will most likely go outside of top 20

Because it's made teams gun shy, that's where we take a punt and reap the rewards. If he's medically sound.

 

[Mr Magic]

Apparently blues are keen on Draper....

when one thinks about it, we could get FOS at 2 which means CFC, not living in a vacuum, would have looked at the prospects and said, if RFC go up the order at 2 and pick FOS, who else do we pick at 3? after watching him they may have taken a liking to him plus thinking AFC may well want Draper at 4.


Furthermore CFC would rather Adelaide goes up to take Draper at 2 so they can get FOS at 3 strategically possibly

 

[_RT_]

I think in any draft, no matter what, you're more likely to pick a potential superstar in the first few pics.
We need the talismans we can build the club around. We need the players who will make fans want to go to the footy.

Sure, this year we could find that at 6 and pick up a nice player late in the first round but I'd much rather we go balls to the wall and try and pluck out two blue chip potential superstars at 1 and 2.
That type of move brings eyes to the club and gets fans through the turnstiles.

How many players taken at 1 or 2 in the draft have ended up being the 2 best players from that draft class?

In 2009 when we landed the Goat, the 2nd best player in that draft was taken at 20 in Nat Fyfe. Scully & Trengove taken at 1 & 2 played less games combined than Martin alone.

 

[copthat]

**** me I had 25 pages to read and in place of some actual news instead I got:

• FOS sliding to 6
• Lalor sliding to 6
• Twomey linking us to 27 players
• Someone asking for a direct line to the recruiting department
• A mock draft where a player gets picked twice
• Trading our next 13 picks for Pick 2
• Smillie = Hopper
• Take Smillie at 1 so some superstar slides to 6
• Like 4 articles that didn't pertain to us
• A mock up of Lalor holding that whiteboard which was actually pretty funny

 

[tigs2010]

• A mock draft where a player gets picked twice

This was definitely the stupidest post in the thread. I mean, what a ****ing idiot

 

[4tune8]

worth a punt if scans are clear, know plenty of people my age that got regularly ko'd in the juniors. its not a death sentence.

But its an end of Football career sentence

New rules coming that place obligation on the AFL are the issue

How many concussions have you had ? or been KO'd ?

weird question but playing footy at least 3 in juniors. took the freekick 2 of those times, the other got walked off and dont remember shit. not saying its not an issue but fmd hes 18 are we saying he cant play footy ever again because the risks too high? how long has boxing been a sport? mma is quite popular still.

You really dont get it do you ?

Its not about if he can still play footy its about will he be allowed to play if he cops another 3 concussions in the next 3-4-5 years. The rules are changing and the AFL will only get harder on these issue's

Brayshaw can still play footy but it gets to a point where liability is way too much of a risk
I see this as the biggest concern with Trainor

Yeah but if every team has that same view its effectively ruling him out of a footy career is what I'm saying. If he's cleared by medicos I see the risk reward being in our favour if it's one of our later picks.

Thats why a player like Trainor that was meant to be a top 10 talent will most likely go outside of top 20

Because it's made teams gun shy, that's where we take a punt and reap the rewards. If he's medically sound.

IIRC Trainor has already had 3 concussions.

4 concussions puts him in the red zone

 

[Groupie_]

len pascoe needs to stay away from the reefer

 

[Rubber Hips]

tim membrey will be like a new recruit

mcfly doesnt rate the draft

McCrap’s schtik is tiresome…won’t take long for filth fans to turn on him..his old man’s club and his stupid laughing routine

 

[prodigy]

How many players taken at 1 or 2 in the draft have ended up being the 2 best players from that draft class?

In 2009 when we landed the Goat, the 2nd best player in that draft was taken at 20 in Nat Fyfe. Scully & Trengove taken at 1 & 2 played less games combined than Martin alone.

Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.

 

[Bojangles17]

Are we allergic to fast players?

We got 6 more pix brudda

 

[Drunken Wookie]

IIRC Trainor has already had 3 concussions.

4 concussions puts him in the red zone

so you only need 12 days off after a concussion before playing footy again but if you get concussed 4 times spanning your life up to that point it's career over? what?

 

[_RT_]

Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.

When there is enough evidence to show that picks 1 & 2 rarely are the 2 best players taken in the draft we can safely say that trading up for 2 isn't the answer