- Jul 1, 2013
- 23,044
- 19,356
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Fulham, 76ers, Cubs, Bills
More freefalling.
1,962
Down to 6.3k
Hope I can start moving up pre byes…..
1,962
Down to 6.3k
Hope I can start moving up pre byes…..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Prime example is the bloke on top after this round. No Green plus has Zorko. Absolute fluke and really completely undeserved. Zorko is not a smart play whilst Green in the wet should be a monty for 120. Instead it’s a 175 point swing over most people who have Green, and no ZorkYep. While a lot is knowledge and research on players roles and positions, luck almost always dictates who finishes in the top 100 or top 1k.
Zorko is avg 121.5 in the last four weeks since I brought him in...how long does he have to continue like that until it's deemed a 'smart play'?Prime example is the bloke on top after this round. No Green plus has Zorko. Absolute fluke and really completely undeserved. Zorko is not a smart play whilst Green in the wet should be a monty for 120. Instead it’s a 175 point swing over most people who have Green, and no Zork
Similar, 2066, though did the loop with Rozee and sat him on the bench but ended up taking Gallager's 47 instead - meh 4pts. Some serious reno's required for the FWD line. Still, now back in to the top 10000 for an 8012 ranking. Now I can feature in some of those great Venn diagrams!2058. Only had Rozee as a problem, but he still outscored every one of my bench players, so not really a big problem. Went up about 3.5k spots to just inside the top 18k.
Scoring wise definitely. But unless you got him at 800, bringing in a 35 year old bloke with a long history of soft tissue injuries for is nuts. If you told me one of Green or Zorko would have a 7 point game it’s Zork every day of the week.Zorko is avg 121.5 in the last four weeks since I brought him in...how long does he have to continue like that until it's deemed a 'smart play'?
I've been following last year's AFL fantasy winner's team for the season so far and he was ranked 2000 odd going into this round. His rank would have plummeted with Tom Green, Whitfield, Fyfe on his field as well as the standard picks like Yeo and Macrae as well.Prime example is the bloke on top after this round. No Green plus has Zorko. Absolute fluke and really completely undeserved. Zorko is not a smart play whilst Green in the wet should be a monty for 120. Instead it’s a 175 point swing over most people who have Green, and no Zorko.
I've been following last year's AFL fantasy winner's team for the season so far and he was ranked 2000 odd going into this round. His rank would have plummeted with Tom Green, Whitfield, Fyfe on his field as well as the standard picks like Yeo and Macrae as well.
You can't tell me that he magically got tha much worse as a coach after winning it last year.
Maybe just week days.Scoring wise definitely. But unless you got him at 800, bringing in a 35 year old bloke with a long history of soft tissue injuries for is nuts. If you told me one of Green or Zorko would have a 7 point game it’s Zork every day of the week.
I'm saying that people understate the amount of luck involved with the game in the top end of the rankings but thanks for the smart ass response.Is the concept of luck playing a part in this game just occurring to you?
Zorko is avg 121.5 in the last four weeks since I brought him in...how long does he have to continue like that until it's deemed a 'smart play'?
2000s to 12000s and lost to a ghost ship running cofield ,sexton, and sanders all on field
Getting subbed is never a good sign. Hoping he gets a good run at it.Curtin won’t be dropped, trust.
But you didn't listen to me either (I didn't listen to me either - but that's another story ).