List Mgmt. 2024 Father Son watch MKIII. Operation Ashcroft jnr. Featuring various academy boys.

[Jivlain]

 

[mpal6]

Interesting. I would have thought we'd be looking at talls later on, but clearly we like Unwin's weapons. Speed is something you can't teach.

And maybe this also explains why we kept Craven: we want a fast young pressure forward to develop behind Charlie.

View attachment 2166399
View attachment 2166401

Looks like we're starting to address the footspeed factor in terms of list balance. With Sharp gone and Mckenna likley closer to departure lounge, Unwin makes sense for us. Might even help release Wilmot or Kiddy upfield.

 

[JasRulz63]

AFL phantom draft: Shock calls, big sliders as top 27 picks predicted in MEGA late mail

AFL phantom draft: Shock calls, big sliders as top 27 picks predicted in mega late mail

www.foxsports.com.au

Would be a great result for us in terms of matching bids.

 

[Cubs2Lions]

Looks like we're starting to address the footspeed factor in terms of list balance. With Sharp gone and Mckenna likley closer to departure lounge, Unwin makes sense for us. Might even help release Wilmot or Kiddy upfield.

Wouldn't be upset with selecting Unwin with our last pick (if still available) and is also a GWW local boy which is nice.

Gabriel Stumpf Draft Profile

central.rookieme.com

Another player that we could look at with similar qualities is Gabriel Stumpf as we love to draft late-bloomers to the club as well as having a point of difference of being 196cm (could play 3rd tall perhaps) and this would allow players such as Rayner, Bailey or L.Ashcroft to play up field more in the midfield.

 

[M Malice]

It's Christmas week for draft nuffies, not much for us Lions fans to get too excited about, although it will be interesting as to where Levi and Sam are bid on and who we take with our third selection... Gallop/Gillett/Unwin or a left field option that hasn't even been mooted as yet.

 

[JasRulz63]

 

[KissKiss]

That's basically pick 2 for pick 4. Can see why it'd be rejected.

Depends if you wanted to take the same kid at 2 or 4. If he's going to be available at 4, then anything on top of that is basically free picks/points. Sure its not a heap but its still more than you get if you take the kid at 2

 

[mpal6]

AFL phantom draft: Shock calls, big sliders as top 27 picks predicted in MEGA late mail

AFL phantom draft: Shock calls, big sliders as top 27 picks predicted in mega late mail

www.foxsports.com.au

Would be a great result for us in terms of matching bids.

If Matt Whitlock is there for pick 27, I wonder if we'll throw our future first in for him. I know matching Annable could become difficult next year depending on points etc, but Matt looks like a perfect tall utility for our list. Richmond may not mind spreading their picks over to next year first rounders as well.

 

[rye]

If Matt Whitlock is there for pick 27, I wonder if we'll throw our future first in for him. I know matching Annable could become difficult next year depending on points etc, but Matt looks like a perfect tall utility for our list. Richmond may not mind spreading their picks over to next year first rounders as well.

i hope not, thats a terrible trade on face value

 

[M Malice]

If Matt Whitlock is there for pick 27, I wonder if we'll throw our future first in for him. I know matching Annable could become difficult next year depending on points etc, but Matt looks like a perfect tall utility for our list. Richmond may not mind spreading their picks over to next year first rounders as well.

I have seen very little of Matt Whitlock or for that matter Ty Gallop but if given a choice I'd prefer Ty, has something special about him from my uneducated viewing of highlight reels.

 

[JasRulz63]

If Matt Whitlock is there for pick 27, I wonder if we'll throw our future first in for him. I know matching Annable could become difficult next year depending on points etc, but Matt looks like a perfect tall utility for our list. Richmond may not mind spreading their picks over to next year first rounders as well.

We'd need to bring in a future second before we can trade a future first.