Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Currently only have 2 list spots available. So if Sharp remains at the Lions, we'd only be able to draft Ashcroft/Marshall + upgrade a rookie + not sign a Joe replacement.Frankly the greatest benefit for us of trading him is probably going to be freeing up a list spot so we can take more picks/keep other players if we want to. I haven't bothered to go through and work out our list spots/picks situation so don't know if we really need to though.
Correct.
If we can squeeze more out of the dees then great, but I actually think pick 49 is about what Sharp is worth. If we would prefer to keep him for depth, then that's totally fine too.
Frankly the greatest benefit for us of trading him is probably going to be freeing up a list spot so we can take more picks/keep other players if we want to. I haven't bothered to go through and work out our list spots/picks situation so don't know if we really need to though.
3 days would be plenty for the official trade period, clubs would be talking behind closed doors out of the spotlight well before anyway.
Fort is a premiership player thank you very kindly and don’t you forget it
Like Dev and Prior as well if they got a go in a side I think they could be ok.49 for Sharp is fine. I can't see him getting a game here unless we have massive injury issues.
Interesting enough a Greta example of why Day would be good. There’s a reason we debuted Smith for four games late in the year but when it came to picking a ruck replacement for a grand final we immediately went with the more experienced Fort.
If Morris or Hipwood went down in a final the next week I’d prefer we selected a mature player like Day debuting someone like Lloyd or playing Ryan who may still have only one game.
It's actually funny watching this trade period now that we're an established successful team and seeing all the crap teams do exactly what Fitzroy and then Brisbane did when they were crap teams.
Trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
If someone's not much good but might make you a bit better don't even bother with them. All it does is make you think you're improving.
To our list manager's credit we didn't ever really go after never was's and has beens. And when we did it was always a mistake but didn't cost us much in draft capital. Look at our success stories ,they were always good players if not champs. Our duds had had it or were never good players anywhere else anyway.
There's something to be learnt from that.
Could consider a 3 way trade. Harry Sharp to Melbourne, pick 49 to GWS, and Brisbane gets picks 53 and 56. That an extra 427 points.Dees can piss off with that 49.Terrible offering.
Good summary. What is really interesting is having a look at our 2019 semi-final team. Only about half played in the premiership this year. We have done a great job at keeping core talent whilst regenerating the list to be in a position to continually challenge and we've been lucky enough to do it via both trade and draft.We've had a ridiculous run of trade period success the last 6 years. Every player we've given up something significant for has been a hit, and a few of the cheap ones worked too. Significant acquistions (either salary or draft pick or both) are bolded.
2018: Neale, McCarthy, Adams, Lyons - 4 for 4 I'd say. Marcus struggled with injury obviously but was good when he played. Traded out Beams for two first rounders but stuffed the first one up (second one eventually became Kai I think??). Made a good pick swap with Gold Coast to get Neale done.
Good summary. What is really interesting is having a look at our 2019 semi-final team. Only about half played in the premiership this year. We have done a great job at keeping core talent whilst regenerating the list to be in a position to continually challenge and we've been lucky enough to do it via both trade and draft.
At the core of it we brought in 3 recognised champs in Neale ,Dunkley and Daniher . People had varying views on Daniher but to me he's always been an elite player.Good summary. What is really interesting is having a look at our 2019 semi-final team. Only about half played in the premiership this year. We have done a great job at keeping core talent whilst regenerating the list to be in a position to continually challenge and we've been lucky enough to do it via both trade and draft.
Is it just me Tom? I never thought either were much good with all due respect to them as people and triers.I think how ruthless we have been in moving players on that weren't good enough has been missed as well. Obviously Witho but Nick Robertson played well as a tagger in that 2019 semi - and got delisted a week later.
Is it just me Tom? I never thought either were much good with all due respect to them as people and triers.
I think overall where we've succeeded as you've alluded to is the ones that really cost us we've got right and the duds haven't cost us much ,if anything.
We've also been good at developing draftees to the best of their potential.
Good stable clubs attract good players and young draftees are happy to go there. I remember when David Parkin said Fitzroy were building a dynasty and from that point that was the end of them so I'm not getting carried away with what the future holds ,but we're well set up without doubt as far as being a destination club.
I still remember Nick Robertson's dad used to post here, lol.I think how ruthless we have been in moving players on that weren't good enough has been missed as well. Obviously Witho but Nick Robertson played well as a tagger in that 2019 semi - and got delisted a week later.
JL didn't play except as sub or when there was an injury for the last 2 years as well.
Lyons,Daniher,Lane,Michael,Madden gone so that's 3 list spots,a rookie and catb rookie gone is it not?Currently only have 2 list spots available. So if Sharp remains at the Lions, we'd only be able to draft Ashcroft/Marshall + upgrade a rookie + not sign a Joe replacement.
Lyons,Daniher,Lane,Michael,Madden gone so that's 3 list spots,a rookie and catb rookie gone is it not?
On SM-A525F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Only 2 list spots. AFL rules state that a club can have a minimum of 36 players to a maximum of 44 players on their playing list - 36 primary list players + 0-6 Rookies + 0-2 Cat B rookies for example.Lyons,Daniher,Lane,Michael,Madden gone so that's 3 list spots,a rookie and catb rookie gone is it not?
All I want come draft night is an AMG and I’ll be more than happy.Only 2 list spots. AFL rules state that a club can have a minimum of 36 players to a maximum of 44 players on their playing list - 36 primary list players + 0-6 Rookies + 0-2 Cat B rookies for example.
Since we added an extra 3 players after our 4 ACL injured players were placed on the LTI, we had 38 on our primary list + 7 Cat A rookies + 2 Cat B rookies. Daniher, Lyons, Michael, Madden = 34, Lane = 8 rookies on the list - List changes, contract status and key dates - 2024
Potential players leaving now are: Beecken [OOC], Craven [OOC], Dev Rob [Eagles/Pies], Prior [OOC - Dons are interested] & Sharp [Dees].
Players coming: Levi + Marshall + potentially a 3rd draftee. A Joe replacement player if we have an available list spot. Upgrading someone on the rookie list to the primary list.
3-way MEGATRADE to break to trade period wide open!!!Could consider a 3 way trade. Harry Sharp to Melbourne, pick 49 to GWS, and Brisbane gets picks 53 and 56. That an extra 427 points.
Don't forget Charlie! He was a bit down this year, but that aside has been the best small forward in the comp since he joined us.At the core of it we brought in 3 recognised champs in Neale ,Dunkley and Daniher . People had varying views on Daniher but to me he's always been an elite player.
Good bloke, and due to him we had high hopes for his son and kept only seeing the good in him out of respect. In reality was a dud on and off the field.I still remember Nick Robertson's dad used to post here, lol.