Who the **** wants to see people talk more shit after a loss??No clips on Freo Site / Socials of people in the media talking about us, why only upload the validation seeking clips after wins?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Who the **** wants to see people talk more shit after a loss??No clips on Freo Site / Socials of people in the media talking about us, why only upload the validation seeking clips after wins?
Christ I hope notHis best football is literally 6-7 years away
You‘re not managing your expectations well if you think he’ll peak in the next year or two.Christ I hope not
There's quite a gulf between 1 year and 6-7 years. What you're saying is he'll only be peaking by the time he comes to the *** end of his massive contract. That would be absurd list management IMOYou‘re not managing your expectations well if you think he’ll peak in the next year or two.
Bloody love Neroli.
It's actually ****ed though. If the kid was wearing blue and gold he'd be protected at all costs like another ruckman that struggles to take marks.
Hopefully he's got thick skin because the West/C7 aren't going to show any mercy.
If it was Liam Ryan again scull dragging his misses while drunk through Kalgoorlie then you would see another cover-up.
The West is vile
Forgetting Jackson for a minute…at what age would you say the average 200cm mobile ruck/forward peaks?There's quite a gulf between 1 year and 6-7 years. What you're saying is he'll only be peaking by the time he comes to the f** end of his massive contract. That would be absurd list management IMO
It's worse than that, this report has an agenda. They are quoting $900k which is BS and they made it the back page cover. Really looks like they are trying to create division through misinformation. I imagine bringing in Jacko on a inflated salary at the cost of a player favourite (Logue) would be a sensitive topic within the club.Bloody love Neroli.
It's actually ****ed though. If the kid was wearing blue and gold he'd be protected at all costs like another ruckman that struggles to take marks.
Hopefully he's got thick skin because the West/C7 aren't going to show any mercy.
His best football could be 6-7 years away but that doesn’t mean he won’t be good until then? If his best football was one year away and then he peaked/regressed that wouldn’t be good would it? You’d hope players keep improving until that age.His best football is literally 6-7 years away…he is far from our biggest concern.
Except it wasn’t at the cost of Logue who I still don’t think is worth the 500k we offered himIt's worse than that, this report has an agenda. They are quoting $900k which is BS and they made it the back page cover. Really looks like they are trying to create division through misinformation. I imaginr bringing in Jacko on a inflated salary at the cost of a player favourite (Logue) would be a sensitive topic within the club.
I reckon when they got a sniff of Jacko at the beginning of the year they put off contract talks for Logue and Acres.Except it wasn’t at the cost of Logue who I still don’t think is worth the 500k we offered him
It's worse than that, this report has an agenda. They are quoting $900k which is BS and they made it the back page cover. Really looks like they are trying to create division through misinformation. I imagine bringing in Jacko on a inflated salary at the cost of a player favourite (Logue) would be a sensitive topic within the club.
This is about list management. If we thought he was a developing player that wasn't going to peak for another 6-7 years, and simultaneously we believe our own rhetoric of three prelims and a flag by 2025, the trade makes zero sense. The price we have paid is for an elite talent now, not one that will take half a decade to reach elite. You would let him develop for another few years at Melbourne if that was the caseForgetting Jackson for a minute…at what age would you say the average 200cm mobile ruck/forward peaks?
The length of his contract, his salary or what’s his favourite movie is irrelevant to when his biological peak happens.
We obviously hope he will still be bloody good before then, but to me the stuff about his peak is just a genetic fact.
Think contract talks for those two were put off early in the year because they just weren’t good. Acres was on the verge of being delisted and it took Griff getting dropped to pull his finger out. Once he started playing well we offered him good money but the second he got dropped he started looking around and had the idea in his mind he was going to play elsewhere.I reckon when they got a sniff of Jacko at the beginning of the year they put off contract talks for Logue and Acres.
I don’t disagree with any of that.This is about list management. If we thought he was a developing player that wasn't going to peak for another 6-7 years, and simultaneously we believe our own rhetoric of three prelims and a flag by 2025, the trade makes zero sense. The price we have paid is for an elite talent now, not one that will take half a decade to reach elite. You would let him develop for another few years at Melbourne if that was the case
Fair enough, my badI don’t disagree with any of that.
My original comment was purely about Jackson the player, not in the context of whether we should or shouldn’t have traded for him at this time.
campaigners