Dog 36
Norm Smith Medallist
Are they playing in the VFL practice match tomorrow morning for some match time?
If they are it may explain why both were not training
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are they playing in the VFL practice match tomorrow morning for some match time?
Acres the outlier there, future 3rd and a deal that is probably below the average wage. Was okay at Freo but an absolute weapon last year.My first point is that it was a) a desire to recruit established AFL proven on-field talent and b) a commitment at the draft and salary level to pay more than the absolute bare minimum such as DFA and mid-season draft picks just hasn't occured by us.
So I get that, as a random example, Blake Acres isn't a superstar, isn't earning huge money and wasn't a huge trade investment by Carlton.
But he still was an established, proven on-field performer when he was recruited, still demanded a multi-year contract well above the minimum amounts, and still required draft assets of some sort to get him, rather than just the nothing.
I actually agree with you that the wing positions are not that important, because and player who is truly first-round worthy as a wing player would naturally be so good that they would move on the ball, a bit like McCluggage has over the last few years and other players like Andrew Gaff have done over the last decade.
Compare for example to us recruiting Jackson Trengove in 2017 (~1.75 million over 4 years) and Lobb ($1.5 million over 3 years). Neither would be considered minor recruits from us at the time, but some of these wingers went for bigger money:
Karl Amon - $2.6 million over 4 years
Rory Atkins - $2 million over 5 years
Brandon Ellis - $3 million over 5 years
Blake Acres: $1.05 million over 3 years
Brad Hill: 800k p/y
I'm not saying these contracts are valuable or good deals bye the clubs per se, just that the clubs have invested a fair chunk of salary (figures that sometimes even exceed e.g. what we paid for Lobb, which people want to claim is a significant salary cap investment by the club), which by its logic means that they were also clear salary cap investments by their respective club.
Players like Stephens, D'Ambrosio and Sharp had their selection of multiple clubs. Like I have no clue what Hawthorn are paying D'Ambriosio, but it was widely reported as a surprise recruitment when Hawthorn outbidded Essendon's mere one-year extension (two or three year contract on at least equivalent money) which therefore to create an outbidding situation is by its nature greater equivalent investment by Hawks than ours to Baker and Poulter.
No current season stats available
This seems true, because of the fact that we've played blokes like McNeil for significant chunks on the wing too, because he has 1, 2 and 3 - even though he would go entire games only getting about 7 possessions, which an 'average' winger should be approaching 20.I think the answer to many questions posed above is that we are extremely demanding of our wings, and over a decade with Bev have clearly demonstrated a rigid archetype for what we need them to have:
Off the top of my head, all of our wings over the last several years have hit at least three of these. Hunter hit 1, 2 and 4. Baz hits 1, 3 and 4. Poulter has 1, 2 and 4. Baker has 1, 3 and 4. Roarke Smith had all four. Bev loved starting Dickson on the wing because he had at least three of them, and his speed was underrated.
- Good-elite running capacity
- Strong defensive running
- Speed
- Above average aerial contest work (note: above average for the wing position, not for a player's height)
On the flip side, Daniel really only has two (1 & 2). Dale and JJ have 1 & 3 at most.
Not commenting on whether this is right or wrong, but we seem to have very specific demands for players that play on the wing.
Yep, being "good" seems secondary to the attributes above - in that we consistently choose players who have more of those attributes over more complete/impactful players who have less.This seems true, because of the fact that we've played blokes like McNeil for significant chunks on the wing too, because he has 1, 2 and 3 - even though he would go entire games only getting about 7 possessions, which an 'average' winger should be approaching 20.
Similar to players like Will Hayes who played a chunk there too.
I don’t know why I’m surprised as this is BigFooty but seriously some of the over reaction and vitriol towards our club is laughable.Sorry I just can't fathom the negativity on here. Its like we're finally looking good in most positions and all the nancies have decided that the season lives or dies on our wings....
#woethewings
On SM-A505YN using BigFooty.com mobile app
No current season stats available
Likely most players are VFL listed tomorrowAre they playing in the VFL practice match tomorrow morning for some match time?
The injury report did lean more towards that he would be no good for this week but a chance for the week after. Whether the club chooses to take that risk on limited game time is a different story.
I'm tending to agree.Luckily Melbourne are a side we can probably get away with only one true sized KPD. Their KPF's aren't dangerous in the air at all.
Roarke Smith played some of the best games as a wing that I've seen during Bevo's tenure. Mostly in the 2021 finals series.
That’s different then if they were being held back today, for tomorrow. That’s a good sign.AFL website suggests Macrae, Garcia and JOD all playing VFL this week
I remember watching the last game of of 2022 v Hawthorn. Roarke was clearly one of the best on. Got us into finalsRoarke Smith played some of the best games as a wing that I've seen during Bevo's tenure. Mostly in the 2021 finals series.
No.Is Pickett still suspended next week?
I agree we need to bolster our wings the way the game has moved. Why I am not sure why Dale has not been tried there. Others can play his role in defense but has been noted by all we do not have a genuine top level winger at the moment and with his move back Dale has developed all of the attributes required now
You don’t rate Buku ahead of JOD atm ?I'm tending to agree.
Coffield Jones JJ
Dale JOD Richards
Daniel
We can list Bramble as the sub and move Daniel up the ground later on. Daniel has plenty of matchups with guys like Chandler, Spargo & Laurie not hugely threatening. Against plenty of other teams, we'd need to bring in Buku for additional aerial support.
You don’t rate Buku ahead of JOD atm ?
He plays like a CHB and whilst listed as 191cm, he plays much taller.
Has not put a foot wrong through pre season and I will be staggered and disappointed if he does not play round 1.
Yep I remember that game.I remember watching the last game of of 2022 v Hawthorn. Roarke was clearly one of the best on. Got us into finals