USA 2024 US Presidential Election: Trump vs Harris (pt II)

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

'Rabid right wingers'
In your opinion is there anyone on the right who is not either rabid or far right? Can you clarify who that might be?

And why are Gorsuch, Barrett and Kavanaugh rabid right wingers?

Please no X screen shots as examples.
For starters
Choosing someone that aligns with your ideology is fine. Perjuring yourself in confirmation hearings probably isn't.

sc-liars-jpg.1443269

Kavanagh has been accused by multiple people of sexual assault, and Trump directed the FBI not to investigate fully despite numerous tips.


He was also an active GOP partisan for the start of his career.

Coney Barret had 3 years experience as a judge, and was rushed through against precedent.

It's not just roe v wade, they have also pulled apart the power of the government agencies to make rules relating to their expertise.
 
Got no idea what you’re banging on about or what point you are trying to make to be honest. I posted a lot in a short timeframe because it was about a specific topic that I was interested in. And that was days before the result.

You are clearly still upset about the result. Go and take a deep breath.

Why the need to claim I'm upset about a result.

I'm quite well thanks for asking.

I'm pulling you up on the picking out of a particular poster based on the amount of posts they make.
 
Higher taxes for one. If you look at US, those States with Democrat government have the highest taxes.

Another is the burdens they force upon businesses.

Then there is the issue of law and order, softer on crime.

Not to mention quotas that are filled on the basis of ideology rather than the qualities of the applicants.
Blue states have a higher quality of living, and subsidise the red states to a massive degree.

 
For starters


Kavanagh has been accused by multiple people of sexual assault, and Trump directed the FBI not to investigate fully despite numerous tips.


He was also an active GOP partisan for the start of his career.

Coney Barret had 3 years experience as a judge, and was rushed through against precedent.

It's not just roe v wade, they have also pulled apart the power of the government agencies to make rules relating to their expertise.
when thomas and or alito retire , cannon will be elevated with 5 mins of experience
 
Why the need to claim I'm upset about a result.

I'm quite well thanks for asking.

I'm pulling you up on the picking out of a particular poster based on the amount of posts they make.

Which was a friendly tongue in cheek joke. I’ve already stated that, and you’re refusing to accept it for some reason. Weird.
If you had of let him speak for himself, we’d be closer to the 1,000 posts.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

For starters


Kavanagh has been accused by multiple people of sexual assault, and Trump directed the FBI not to investigate fully despite numerous tips.


He was also an active GOP partisan for the start of his career.

Coney Barret had 3 years experience as a judge, and was rushed through against precedent.

It's not just roe v wade, they have also pulled apart the power of the government agencies to make rules relating to their expertise.
Is being accused of sexual assault only a right wing thing?
And what do you mean by an 'active partisan'? Can you be an inactive partisan or an active non-partisan or an inactive non-partisan?
 
will nato step in? yes i an aware of the clause

If NATO step in to assist a country not part of their treaty could trigger a wider war.

its all a bit of a crock of shit anyway.

Russia is a NATO "Partnership for Peace" country..............Ukraine is a "Enhanced opportunity Partner" yet they are at war.

Just dumb bureaucracy
 
Is being accused of sexual assault only a right wing thing?
And what do you mean by an 'active partisan'? Can you be an inactive partisan or an active non-partisan or an inactive non-partisan?
The accusation of sexual assault in of itself wasn't the major issue as it was just an accusation, it was the blocking of any investigation into it by the Trump Whitehouse.

Having said that only two supreme court justices have had credible claims of sexual harassment/assault against them, both of them are very right wing.

In terms of him being an active partisan, he was heavily involved in working with the GOP, including on the Starr Report, that's cool, its his prerogative, but not sure that then means you can be an impartial judge.
 
The accusation of sexual assault in of itself wasn't the major issue as it was just an accusation, it was the blocking of any investigation into it by the Trump Whitehouse.

Having said that only two supreme court justices have had credible claims of sexual harassment/assault against them, both of them are very right wing.

In terms of him being an active partisan, he was heavily involved in working with the GOP, including on the Starr Report, that's cool, its his prerogative, but not sure that then means you can be an impartial judge.
All judges have biases - they are human beings, not robots.
And again - what is the difference between being 'very right wing' and plain ordinary 'right wing'?
 
All judges have biases - they are human beings, not robots.
And again - what is the difference between being 'very right wing' and plain ordinary 'right wing'?
Right wing make decisions with a slant, very right wing jump into overturning long standing precedence to push ideological points.
 
To describe the Democrats as a left wing party is to be in open defiance of reality.

The republicans, murdoch media and online platforms have expertly got people riled up about culture war issues, most largely have nothing to do with the Democratic Party and it’s usually them taking some fringe issue and making it seem huge.

Then the people who buy into it will vote against their best economic interests taking on this imaginary woke bogeyman.
 
I mean, subjectivity is absolutely a thing. The problem I have is that depicting the Democrats as left wing would require them to do something or have a policy that is left wing.

Obamacare, probably, but what else about the Dems is left wing at all?

Not wanting to kill trans people or deport all illegal immigrants?
 
The republicans, murdoch media and online platforms have expertly got people riled up about culture war issues, most largely have nothing to do with the Democratic Party and it’s usually them taking some fringe issue and making it seem huge.

Then the people who buy into it will vote against their best economic interests taking on this imaginary woke bogeyman.
Hmmm...

I don't know. stefcep's post above provided a few ways the Dems can be at least depicted as a left wing option over the republicans, and while it shouldn't be groundbreaking that being pro-regulation or taxes is left wing, it serves at least to depict them as a centre-left.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

USA 2024 US Presidential Election: Trump vs Harris (pt II)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top