USA 2024 US Presidential Election: Trump vs Harris (pt II)

Remove this Banner Ad

So a bunch of 200 or so people largely unarmed arriving on the Capital in a country of 200 million was actually going to over turn an election and take control of the most powerful country on earth.
Complete and utter fantasy.
lol

I love this dodge - like the people there on Jan 6 represent the totality if Trump's efforts to overturn the election.

Try fake electors and I just need you to find me 11k votes? Oh but it didn't work right, therefore no action at all needs to be taken in response to it and Donnie boy totally fine to be anywhere near another election :drunk:

Just staggering dishonesty and willful avoidance of reality.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Agree which is why I am surprised by the uproar about Trump and so called 'misinformation'.

I seriously don't think that it was made more dangerous, they were words he has spoken and does so on many occasions, he knows what he is saying and for me is like a call to his supporters. Dog Whistling.

This I agree with and further it isn't misinformation as those were his words. Out of context? perhaps yes.

yes, it's probably correct to assume he can dangle words out there and know his supporters will react. he may do it knowingly or unknowingly. he may think it attracts votes, and he might even think or hope someone will act on it. it's strange for someone who was themselves nearly assassinated.
but does this then mean if we're primarily concerned about how dangerous his words have the potential to be, then perhaps we ought to leave in any bits he's said that may lead his supporters away from making those conclusions and acting on his words? if his words are dangerous with or without context, why take bits out?

my other reason for being uncomfortable about edited clips is it tends to cheapen the argument. why give an opponent an opportunity to say you're arguing in bad faith - it gives them an out.
 
That “he wants” 9 barrels pointed at her?

Again, that’s not what he said.
After calling Cheney “a very dumb individual,” he said: “She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with the rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. OK, let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face.

Is this not what he said?

And what about the rest of the quote?

Or do you only want to show the part that suits your views? The next part is the main context.

Don’t tell me a moderator is providing lack of context on this forum…?
Looks like he provided exactly what you asked for

It doesnt matter the ''next 15 seconds' you said Trump never said the quote provided

You got it wrong
 
Looks like he prvided exactly what you asked for

It doesnt matter the ''next 15 seconds' you said Trump never said the quote provided

You got it wrong

Yeah, they cut out the most important part that essentially sets the context.
For someone who hates lack of context and misinformation, why am I not surprised this is suddenly now okay. You really are scraping the barrel.
 
authentic eh?
180809-trump-putin-mc-1250.JPG
2800.jpg
hq720.jpg
Cassidy-Sharpiegate.jpg
mqdefault.jpg
1200x675_cmsv2_896c8218-afd8-5057-b76d-f85449e57399-8337230.jpg
106821710-1610142988211-tru.jpg
woj6cz63huob1.jpg
OK spot one I guess, showing us his true inner self

and of course here's he so very authentic
200603224536-06-donald-trump-church-visit-0601.jpg
images
authentic eh?
180809-trump-putin-mc-1250.JPG
2800.jpg
hq720.jpg
Cassidy-Sharpiegate.jpg
mqdefault.jpg
1200x675_cmsv2_896c8218-afd8-5057-b76d-f85449e57399-8337230.jpg
106821710-1610142988211-tru.jpg
woj6cz63huob1.jpg
OK spot one I guess, showing us his true inner self

and of course here's he so very authentic
200603224536-06-donald-trump-church-visit-0601.jpg
images
Dancing before the riot by Kimberlee
 
Yeah, they cut out the most important part that essentially sets the context.
For someone who hates lack of context and misinformation, why am I not surprised this is suddenly now okay. You really are scraping the barrel.
It doesnt matter - you said Trump never said the words - he did

You can provide context all you like as long as you acknowledge Trump indeed said those words
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

It doesnt matter - you said Trump never said the words - he did

You can provide context all you like as long as you acknowledge Trump indeed said those words

You can’t possibly be this thick.

What, that he wants nine barrels pointed at her face?

a very dumb individual,” he said: “She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with the rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. OK, let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face.

Here’s the rest:

“You know, they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, ‘oh, gee, we’ll, let’s send — let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy.’”
 
If we break down the Trump Cheney statement legally, yeah he did not specifically call for her execution. And so it is correct to call out the media for doing that.
BUT that was not where the danger of his statements come from. That single sentence is a dogwhistle to his more enthralled and violent supporters. That is the point of dog whistling, giving plausible distance between the whistler and the dogs. He should loudly denounce for using such language. He could have used regular combat imagery, not a firing squad. That is a big effin distinction. Maybe he could have used John McCain as an example of combat vet.
 
If we break down the Trump Cheney statement legally, yeah he did not specifically call for her execution. And so it is correct to call out the media for doing that..

Which is what I’ve done. Plus called out the cropped videos. Supposedly this is still an issue. It’s hilarious.
 
Cool. So you support the cropped video and lack of context. Glad we got there in the end.
I dont care

I care that you are backtracking on Trump not saying the words he did indeed say
 
If we break down the Trump Cheney statement legally, yeah he did not specifically call for her execution. And so it is correct to call out the media for doing that.
BUT that was not where the danger of his statements come from. That single sentence is a dogwhistle to his more enthralled and violent supporters. That is the point of dog whistling, giving plausible distance between the whistler and the dogs. He should loudly denounce for using such language. He could have used regular combat imagery, not a firing squad. That is a big effin distinction. Maybe he could have used John McCain as an example of combat vet.
She is also being tarnished with her father's actions.

Dog whistling of the highest order just like 'Stand down and stand by'.

I am so over the hypocritical Trump apologists.

Imagine Harris saying something similar. Biden's mentioning garbage and the outcry that followed.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

USA 2024 US Presidential Election: Trump vs Harris (pt II)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top