Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Hard core swifties will likely be ones voting with emotion and feelings rather than doing their own thinking.How many votes do you think she’s worth? lol
The man who said. “I heard the scientists say the other day that when a man votes for a woman, he actually transitions into a woman.” He is certainly dumb enough to be a Trump fanboy. I tried to find that scientist who said that, and couldn't, it appears the scientist only exists in Mr Watters mind.He wants Jesse Watters to moderate the debate “because he said I won last night’s debate.”
Can’t see anything wrong with that.
The left is not represented in this USA election.Unfortunately Harris won the debate tonight. And even if she didn't she did well and truly enough to calm any worries about her not being able to handle Trump in a Debate.
She did enough tonight, but I hope it wasn't enough in the end to sway to many undecided voters.
Was the Debate skewed against Trump, absolutely, but we all know the ABC would make it a lot easier for the Democrats going in to it.
Trump looked rattled a little for mine.
God help the Americans that the gap between Right and Left is a chasm and looks like it will never be mended. sadly its past the point of fixing.
God help the West..... the Decline is nearly beyond fixing now.
This is correct
Important thing is how the debate lands with the undecideds
Any even more importantly how little moments of the debate that get snipped out of the full two hour event and circulated endlessly on social media land with undecideds
The man who said. “I heard the scientists say the other day that when a man votes for a woman, he actually transitions into a woman.” He is certainly dumb enough to be a Trump fanboy. I tried to find that scientist who said that, and couldn't, it appears the scientist only exists in Mr Watters mind.
He had to thinkHow?
Another Trump acolyte from Faux
#sobrave
If you think russian cyber attack , wait for swifties to cyber attack levin
They have caused ticketmaster grief
The Justice Department wants to 'break up Live Nation.' Taylor Swift fans are ready for it.
Frustration over the ticketing company began to boil over in late 2022 as fans complained about overloaded presale queues for the domestic leg of Swift’s 2023 "Eras Tour."www.nbcnews.com
U2tigers, you’re not a genuine Trump fan are you?Unfortunately Harris won the debate tonight. And even if she didn't she did well and truly enough to calm any worries about her not being able to handle Trump in a Debate.
She did enough tonight, but I hope it wasn't enough in the end to sway to many undecided voters.
Was the Debate skewed against Trump, absolutely, but we all know the ABC would make it a lot easier for the Democrats going in to it.
Trump looked rattled a little for mine.
God help the Americans that the gap between Right and Left is a chasm and looks like it will never be mended. sadly its past the point of fixing.
God help the West..... the Decline is nearly beyond fixing now.
There is no evidence that republican policy is better for the economy. And there is also issues of whether policy can be implemented. Trump cannot organise or implement. So unless your economic theory is the libertarian “no government” approach I’m struggling to see how it worksProbably that they would secure my Border, handle the Economy way better, and would put the nation first.
But hey you pick your things that matter to you and I will pick mine.
Swift?How many votes do you think she’s worth? lol
Probably that they would secure my Border, handle the Economy way better, and would put the nation first.
But hey you pick your things that matter to you and I will pick mine.
There is no evidence that republican policy is better for the economy. And there is also issues of whether policy can be implemented. Trump cannot organise or implement. So unless your economic theory is the libertarian “no government” approach I’m struggling to see how it works
Lol no she wasn't. There were times where the moderators refused to let her respond to Trump and pointed out her inconsistent positions on various policies.Kamala was treated with kid gloves, which was to be expected.
Not aware of any outside of termination for those pregnancies that cannot independently live (anencephaly etc) certainly nothing re healthy babies. The abortion laws are such a shitshow that gynae docs aren’t even sure if they can surgically intervene on a septic miscarriageWhat else can any politician do in the Abortion debate. It is such a hot divisive issue. I actually think he handles this issue well.
And there are people in America and on the Democratic side who are championing full term abortions, as sickening as that sounds.
Abortion would be any politicians krytonite.
Swift is an artist with a following that is the closest thing I've seen to modern day Beatlemania. Imagine someone with that pull with their fans saying they'll vote for Kamala Harris? I suspect the election was a done deal even with Biden, too many people hate Trump and saner Republicans will not vote, but this endorsement has slammed the door shut imo.Swift?
Not many at all.
My feeling is that the celebrity endorsements mean a lot less than people think they will.
Hillary had about 400,000 celebrity endorsements and it didn’t do her much good – a lot of average Americans don’t like being told what to do by rich Hollywood / music industry types.
Might help a bit with a few young first time voters but a lot of the ones who might be influenced would be in the Harris camp already.
Having said all that I think the timing of her announcement might be tactically important . . . it means that a bit more of the post debate commentary will focus of Harris and the Democrats and make it harder for the Republicans to do damage control.
That was with moderating influences and competent republicans. They have now been replaced with magadiots like Majorie Taylor green et al.Everyone forgets Trump has already been president for 4 years, we can link back that to what he would be about today.
From what he posted and not knowing any other history seems a fan of traditional Republican policy and outcomes and believes this will continue under another trump administration (presumably the party machine would control trump). Likely would have wanted Haley to have been the candidate (I certainly did/do)U2tigers, you’re not a genuine Trump fan are you?
This is just another bit of your (justly famous) trolling, right?
For Trump, a policy is just a slogan telling people what they want to hear, with absolutely no actual plan to do it.Not much attraction at all.
But its the policies that would have me as a Republican voter regardless who the leader is.
Surely America has better candidates then who currently they have leading each party.
Hope you’re rightSwift is an artist with a following that is the closest thing I've seen to modern day Beatlemania. Imagine someone with that pull with their fans saying they'll vote for Kamala Harris? I suspect the election was a done deal even with Biden, too many people hate Trump and saner Republicans will not vote, but this endorsement has slammed the door shut imo.
Why do they always think this about these characters? They couldn't control Trump last time, less chance this time. Pre WWII the German conservatives, big business and military thought they could control Hitler. Same mistake.From what he posted and not knowing any other history seems a fan of traditional Republican policy and outcomes and believes this will continue under another trump administration (presumably the party machine would control trump). Likely would have wanted Haley to have been the candidate (I certainly did/do)
Exactly rightFor Trump, a policy is just a slogan telling people what they want to hear, with absolutely no actual plan to do it.
Its like Brexit, where Boris had a policy to replace deals with the EU, with deals with other countries, that were better, but when asked how they were going to do this, the only thing they had was, they were going to negotiate really really hard and get really really good deals. Thats what Brexiters wanted to hear, but its not a policy, its a vague aspiration, with no clue how to do it.
Thats Trump in a nutshell, he finds out what you want, then says he is going to get it for you. But that's not a policy, its not even a vague intention, he isn't even going to try, and wouldn't know how even if he did.
His only kept promise was permanent tax cuts for the rich.
If abortion was not an election issue due to roe being overturned , I would say Swift influence would not be so great but as the vast majority of voting Swifities are 18-40 female in there prime reproductive stage , abortion is a big deal . Trump never said he would not sign a national abortion bill .he threw vance under the busSwift?
Not many at all.
My feeling is that the celebrity endorsements mean a lot less than people think they will.
Hillary had about 400,000 celebrity endorsements and it didn’t do her much good – a lot of average Americans don’t like being told what to do by rich Hollywood / music industry types.
Might help a bit with a few young first time voters but a lot of the ones who might be influenced would be in the Harris camp already.
Having said all that I think the timing of her announcement might be tactically important . . . it means that a bit more of the post debate commentary will focus of Harris and the Democrats and make it harder for the Republicans to do damage control.