Why the hell should homosexuality be a slur in the first place, just like disabilities. Long bow to draw the soft**** and the cerevbal palsy comparison (earlier). Even to the homeosexuality line, gay people have been drawn and quartered for centuries and still have to put up with shit just because they are gay. All us blokes will be softcocks eventually through age or availability, so hardly a comparable insult.With due respect, you've pulled that out of your ass haven't you?
You can't see sexual orientation. Homophobic slurs are hidden by those standards.
The R word is hidden. You can't see how fast someone's mind works from the outside and not everyone has identifiable physical features associated with being slow to learn.
"You're a <insert homophobic slur>"
"Oh I didn't know you were homosexual, I couldn't see that. Now that you've informed me, I won't call you that again, but I'll continue to use the term as an insult towards others".
It's a slippery slope and your logic cannot exclude "soft****" from being offensive, as it's a legitimate medical problem and you're making all men everywhere who suffer from erectile dysfunction feel worse about themselves every time they hear that term used as a derogatory term. You can't escape this fact.
And once you're willing to accept that "soft****" is offensive to millions of men, then any adjective "soft" used to describe a footballer is also offensive if society has that word at the front of their mind. It's discriminating against millions of men with a medical condition and making them feel worse about their condition.
That's why it's stupid to go down the slippery slope of banning words.