Past #26: Tarryn Thomas [Part III] - 18 week suspension confirmed; ineligible to play in '24 season; NMFC has officially sacked Tarryn.

[The Butcher]

This categorisation of human interactions is the ultimate bureaucratic efficiency bullshit. Genius conforming to grids.

The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the …

In a book of unprecedented scope, Iain McGilchrist pres…

www.goodreads.com

 

[Mcarcherey]

Out of curiosity has anyone been cheated on by their partner and with one of their friends

And how did you respond if so?

i think around here many posters reactions will be the oppposite to anger

 

[Tas]

So is the big contract in 2024 still a chance? :stern look

 

[Devington]

Out of curiosity has anyone been cheated on by their partner and with one of their friends

And how did you respond if so?

Never happened to me but I don’t imagine taking it too well. I’d like to think I wouldn’t threaten violence but I also wouldn’t take it lightly and there would be some insults thrown at the friend and ex

Now if I got baited after the fact ideally I’d take the high road but I could see others not

Why are you so obsessed with dying on the hill of this hypothetical where every ****ed up message was him being baited into it?

 

[The Nostradamus]

Why are you so obsessed with dying on the hill of this hypothetical where every ****ed up message was him being baited into it?

I don’t know about every message

The first complaint tho came about because his ex cheated on him with his friend

The new one was him responding to the recent ex that he wouldn’t change in relation to those prior texts

 

[Devington]

I don’t know about every message

The first complaint tho came about because his ex cheated on him with his friend

The new one was him responding to the recent ex that he wouldn’t change in relation to those prior texts

So what. I literally don't understand your point.

 

[The Nostradamus]

So what. I literally don't understand your point.

My point is context is important to understand what led to the message

Doesn’t change him being wrong but also paints the full picture for both sides

 

[Devington]

My point was context is important to understand what led to the message

Doesn’t change him being wrong but also paints the full picture for both sides

For one message? Among a heap?
What was the context for throwing the lamp btw

 

[The Nostradamus]

For one message? Among a heap?
What was the context for throwing the lamp btw

No idea
Hence why context is important

we know context behind one exchange

If it makes him look worse so be it release it

But right now we are getting one side only

 

[Disco Dew]

Hahaha. CoNtExT.
Stfu.

It’s sad and pathetic at this point. What would the context you crave so much actually do for you?

 

[The Nostradamus]

Hahaha. CoNtExT.
Stfu.

It’s sad and pathetic at this point. What would the context you crave so much actually do for you?

Show both sides

And either make him look even worse or slightly better albeit still in the wrong

 

[Disco Dew]

Show both sides

And either make him look even worse or slightly better albeit still in the wrong

 

[The Filth Wizard]

Show both sides

And either make him look even worse or slightly better albeit still in the wrong

To what end?

 

[Supa_Nova]

Police investigation official now. Worse then we all thought then. Great club decision, move on.

 

[Devington]

To what end?

He's just that determined for us to finally crush the mid season draft by picking... TARRYN THOMAS!

 

[Devington]

Police investigation official now. Worse then we all thought then. Great club decision, move on.

Eh, I don't want to read into it too much at this point. I didn't hear that anyone actually went to them, correct me if I'm wrong though, so I think it might just be a case of them hearing of a high profile recidivist player being sacked for domestic abuse so are looking into it.

 

[The Filth Wizard]

He's just that determined for us to finally crush the mid season draft by picking... TARRYN THOMAS!

Cat B rookie.

 

[Supa_Nova]

Eh, I don't want to read into it too much at this point. I didn't hear that anyone actually went to them, correct me if I'm wrong though, so I think it might just be a case of them hearing of a high profile recidivist player being sacked for domestic abuse so are looking into it.

Yeah maybe. Forgot that the HS might just have a clickbait story hahaha my bad for trusting the newspaper

 

[Disco Dew]

Police investigation official now. Worse then we all thought then. Great club decision, move on.

Context. I need context as to why the police are now involved.
Con…text.
Con.
C.
.

 

[Dan]

Police investigation official now. Worse then we all thought then. Great club decision, move on.

and this sorta thing would have dragged on for another year......more negative media coverage, more distractions.

 

[amaz199]

If your partner/gf has a rough relationship with you, your reaction should be one of or all of the following:

1. Throw a lamp at them
2. Threaten to leak nude photos of them
3. Threaten to hurt them.

And this is ok apparently.

 

[The Nostradamus]

If your partner/gf has a rough relationship with you, your reaction should be one of or all of the following:

1. Throw a lamp at them
2. Threaten to leak nude photos of them
3. Threaten to hurt them.

And this is ok apparently.

Cheating on you with your friend, rough is an understatement

But no one said it’s ok to react the way you mentioned

 

[Makeshift Park]

Show both sides

And either make him look even worse or slightly better albeit still in the wrong

Guessing you also reckon there's no need for courts to issue suppression orders to protect victims?

 

[Makeshift Park]

Cheating on you with your friend, rough is an understatement

But no one said it’s ok to react the way you mentioned

You don't reckon any of Jenn, Todd, Sonja, TT's lawyer or Ben Williams would have appealed if there were actual grounds to do so?

Why?

 

[The Nostradamus]

You don't reckon any of Jenn, Todd, Sonja, TT's lawyer or Ben Williams would have appealed if there were actual grounds to do so?

Why?

of course they would but there really isn’t any grounds to regardless even if she was threatening him first it still would have fallen back on him

Once he responded he was in trouble

Just needed to ignore but the bloke is immature has an ego and reacted to the cheating

The context is still important and sheds light as to why it got to this stage