28 546 at the G: Melb v the Hawks

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 14, 2011
44,794
16,868
Trafalgar
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Mclaren Mercedes F1
Poor old crowd at a poor old game - bringing the game into disrepute?

What sort of membership numbers are these clubs claiming (poor crowd)?

How many of their members were in the AFL reserve ?

How many of their fans preferred the MCC reserve?

Was this game a make up game for the Hawks members to cover the games in Tassie?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Maybe we could worry about the crowds at GWS that gets reported at 6,500 despite shrinking each week.

Melbourne are struggling thats obvious - do you really need to pick on our crowds and I think what's happened is an 8-1 Hawthorn have a few fans who probably have seen enough winning.

That said Dawes, Jones and Frawley put on a reasonable show for a 3 player team that got belted by nearly 100 if you forget about the other 19 clowns wearing red and blue.
 
Roger that Messenger, thanks, real low % of members of both clubs, inflated by MCC members, is that number published anywhere?
Nice afternoon in Melbourne :thumbsu:.

What is your point?
 
Maybe we could worry about the crowds at GWS that gets reported at 6,500 despite shrinking each week.

Melbourne are struggling thats obvious - do you really need to pick on our crowds and I think what's happened is an 8-1 Hawthorn have a few fans who probably have seen enough winning.

That said Dawes, Jones and Frawley put on a reasonable show for a 3 player team that got belted by nearly 100 if you forget about the other 19 clowns wearing red and blue.

Relax Mazda, real Melbourne fans dont join the footy club, they join the cricket club dont they or the AFL - Hawks fans arent real people.

Dont worry about GWS it doesnt claim to be footy heartland.
 
Poor old crowd at a poor old game - bringing the game into disrepute?

c3d0981ae770f926eedf4eda7505b006.jpeg
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

What is your point?

Of the claimed members, so few attended - how inflated are club claims?
Clubs should be forced to declare $s v claimed membership numbers. bit of transparency because fans are being fed 5hit & it is believed by so many.
 
Of the claimed members, so few attended - how inflated are club claims?
Clubs should be forced to declare $s v claimed membership numbers. bit of transparency because fans are being fed 5hit & it is believed by so many.

That makes no sense. The HFC have my membership money whether I show up or not. And given that my $470 membership is given the same weight as my son's $59 membership or any other 11 or 18 game package, what would you gain from it?
 
Suffer a head injury today?

Not with the heads of dogs, chicken, cats or even the assorted odd croc. Hawks claimed membership is not real & if the $s were lined up against them, your lot would be ridiculed - join a demand for transparent reporting messenger, embarassing as it will be for the Hawks.
 
Of the claimed members, so few attended - how inflated are club claims?
Clubs should be forced to declare $s v claimed membership numbers. bit of transparency because fans are being fed 5hit & it is believed by so many.


So you don't believe that Hawthorn have sold all the memberships they have reported?

I think your tin foil hat isn't screwed on properly
 
Not with the heads of dogs, chicken, cats or even the assorted odd croc. Hawks claimed membership is not real & if the $s were lined up against them, your lot would be ridiculed - join a demand for transparent reporting messenger, embarassing as it will be for the Hawks.

I'm honestly embarrassed for you. How would you go about proving such an claim?

Is this an extension of your anti-Victorian shtick?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top