- Sep 9, 2003
- 27,578
- 28,760
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- FGR
Fyfe averaged 25 touches in his second season.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Someone, (Pykie maybe?) posted a photo of Fyfe at the same age and maybe put up some stats with it. They did look very similar physically.Someone would need to explain the Fyfe comparision to me. He's nowhere near Fyfe's size and I haven't seen his aerial game or ground game being like Fyfe's.
He actually looks a bit more solid than Taylor there.I don’t necessarily agree that he can go full midfielder like Fyfe and put on that level of size, but Fyfe was very similar to Taylor in u18 and his first couple years in the system as a lead up half forward. My memory is that he rarely played as a midfielder in u18 (might be wrong, but I really liked him in u18s). I don’t think anyone could have predicted that Fyfe was capable of putting on such size, the guy is an actual beast (considering he was a twig). He also picked up the midfield craft incredibly well. I have no idea if Taylor can add both size and midfield craft to his game, but they were equally elite overhead in their junior days.
View attachment 1011566
Someone would need to explain the Fyfe comparision to me. He's nowhere near Fyfe's size and I haven't seen his aerial game or ground game being like Fyfe's.
Yeah I did see Curtis' hangers. But I haven't seen Fyfe take marks like that. I may be wrong (don't watch Freo much) but Fyfe's aerial and ground games seem based on brute strength. I just don't see Curtis' game being the same.He had a similar build at the same age, played a smilar role in u/18's.
You didn't see Curtis take more than a few contested marks, a few hangers etc? Curtis is fairly ridiculous overhead for his current body size, he's going to be amazing overhead in 4-5 years.
Fyfe is a genetic freak though, chances are Taylor only gets moderately bigger rather than putting on 20+ kg's of lean muscle like Fyfe did.
I think Taylor is as good as Fyfe was on the ground. I.e pretty damn great for a medium forward.
I think Taylor is going to be the best out of all of Thomas, Zurhaar etc as a half forward.
He had a similar build at the same age, played a smilar role in u/18's.
You didn't see Curtis take more than a few contested marks, a few hangers etc? Curtis is fairly ridiculous overhead for his current body size, he's going to be amazing overhead in 4-5 years.
Fyfe is a genetic freak though, chances are Taylor only gets moderately bigger rather than putting on 20+ kg's of lean muscle like Fyfe did.
I think Taylor is as good as Fyfe was on the ground. I.e pretty damn great for a medium forward.
I think Taylor is going to be the best out of all of Thomas, Zurhaar etc as a half forward.
I noticed something similar too. He's really slimmed down.I watched Taylor doing drils at training last week, I reckon he's dropped 4 or 5 kg's.
His arms have no definition at all.
I noticed something similar too. He's really slimmed down.
i agree but feel like the timing of his injury was poor. he had a great start to 2020 and am happy to give him a little extra time to build those numbers. He has only player 11 games.His early highlights reel is nice, but he's still just a 10 disposal player.
He needs to go up another gear now.
Plugger locket was a 10 disposal player.His early highlights reel is nice, but he's still just a 10 disposal player.
He needs to go up another gear now.
Plugger locket was a 10 disposal player.
His early highlights reel is nice, but he's still just a 10 disposal player.
He needs to go up another gear now.
Without going full Confucius, they'll turn.
Kayne Turner was all the rage early on before some supporters cottoned on that his numbers weren't going magically going up. Suddenly those handful of very visible pressure acts didn't provide the sugar hit for them anymore.
If Taylor or Thomas don't increase their production (you've posted about this a bit) I expect they'll be in the gun soon enough when 2-3 goals every 2-3 games with some nice marks thrown in don't sate the collective appetites.
I'm not even slightly claiming that Curtis won't attain top shelf status as a footballer, but folks are carrying on as if it has arrived or that it is automatically pre-ordained, but that's just not the case right now.
As of 2020, he's a tease.
Example: Davies-Uniake will be a gun, Curtis Taylor is still no certainty.
Same. He has clear kick/mark grade talent.
But taking that show from the Brad Pearce outside courts to Nathan Fyfe arena is one giant leap.
Some folks are just straight out OTT with Curtis as of right now, and the same goes for Kyron Hayden.
I'm not writing either kid off, but I'm not seing what all the gush is about either.
As far as I'm concerned they're both unlikely to play round 1 if we have a full list. THAT'S where they are right now.
As I wrote somewhere recently - very hard to know the best 22 for found 1 - you could easily be correct that neither play - of play
Both in great Nick snd training so time will tell but with so much competition for spots snd new leadership - who knows.
Both great to have on the list with plenty to offer so fingers crossed they can step up this year!
I saw what you did there...Without going full Confucius, they'll turn.
Kayne Turner was all the rage early on before some supporters cottoned on that his numbers weren't going magically going up. Suddenly those handful of very visible pressure acts didn't provide the sugar hit for them anymore.
If Taylor or Thomas don't increase their production (you've posted about this a bit) I expect they'll be in the gun soon enough when 2-3 goals every 2-3 games with some nice marks thrown in don't sate the collective appetites.