- Nov 25, 2015
- 19,074
- 65,186
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Richmond VFL Richmond VFLW AFLW
If we need him to win the game he playsNo , cotch occasion doesnt deserve a sideshow
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If we need him to win the game he playsNo , cotch occasion doesnt deserve a sideshow
Don't reckon he makes it to 100
Im up for a bet
Go on...
Oh yeah he'll go around for sure. Not sure he's a lock in the 22 from next year though.
Bottle of $70 of your choice from Dan Murphy
I say he gets to 100 games
Nah im not that invested in it.
BigFooty Premium Platinum (AU$19.99 for 1 year)?
Yeah I was thinking the same thingLuckily this bet didnt eventuate
wouldnt look great for me now TT if we did bet
Did DeGoey (or anyone else for that matter) play when with assault charges pending? I can't remember. But that'd be a more serious crime than burglary I'd suggest.Even if Pickett's head is in the right head space & he wants to play this week.
Innocent until proven guilty. but given the seriousness of the allegations, I would not be playing him this week.
This week should all be about Trent Cotchin playing he's 300th game no distractions.
Round 3 last year against the saints at marvelIt'll be forgotten about for the duration of the game. Media will go into hysterics and Saints ferals will boo him every time he goes near it if he plays.
This was posted in the arrested thread but feel like it's relevant here.
This is a good point, I reckon it played a small part in the club deciding not to play him.
unless the rafl come in and say otherwiseNo reason to think he won't get the two games. Benny insisted he'd be available to play straight after the bye.
I doubt it.unless the rafl come in and say otherwise
and according to sources within the rafl
this might happen
wouldnt surprise me certainly hope not but nothing surprises me about the aflI doubt it.
Don’t know if it’s that simpleIf we were a good team he wouldn't be close to the best 22. But we're going to have a bad season so I kind of get why he looks likely to play a lot.
Still, if it was me I'm playing younger players over him unless there is a sizeable gap in output. I don't believe there is.
Pickett is not the future and I'd argue should not be the present either.
Don’t know if it’s that simple
If that’s the mentality we are going to have we may as well stop giving Dusty, Grimes and Lynch games as well
Just pick the best 22 available every week regardless of age and experience
When the kids are good enough they will naturally push the older players out but as it stands Pickett is still in our best two wing options and until he isn’t he should be getting games
play every week to win