The King!
Chosen One
He's staying I guarantee it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Thought he was signing months ago
I did on the weekends gameHe is waiting for you to compliment him .
I did on the weekends game
Said he was better in the ruck
Great mark in the thread once
Said he should do well against the giants week defence
Beat his one on ones in that game than he has all season , great game
I think he is gone but just imoOver to you Logan !!
I think he is gone but just imo
As long as we get a first round
I think he is gone but just imo
As long as we get a first round
I think he is gone but just imo
As long as we get a first round
If Logan wants to get to RFA 4 years is the logical contract length. Otherwise I would have thought the longer the better with inflation and TPP changes built in.The answers regarding Logans contract nearly always involves around years.
Does he want 2, 4, 10?
Does the club want 3, 5, 7?
What is the hard bit.
Logan wants 2, Club wants 7.
Logan wants 10, Club wants 3.
If It's the first, then the club can accept it eventually and negotiate in 2 years.
If It's the second, that's a very different situation.
Sent from my SM-G990E using Tapatalk
Manager will say go 4 to get to RFA and do it right around the next injection of the CBA so he could get a McKay type of contract but for the duration of the deal where he honestly earns well over 1m a year for many years.If Logan wants to get to RFA 4 years is the logical contract length. Otherwise I would have thought the longer the better with inflation and TPP changes built in.
I can't see any real benefit to club or player going shorter than that unless Logan's manager can see a significant increase in value in 2 or 3 years.
If Logan wants to get to RFA 4 years is the logical contract length. Otherwise I would have thought the longer the better with inflation and TPP changes built in.
I can't see any real benefit to club or player going shorter than that unless Logan's manager can see a significant increase in value in 2 or 3 years.
Indeed. 4 years is good for both, great for LM and fair for SMSS.Manager will say go 4 to get to RFA and do it right around the next injection of the CBA so he could get a McKay type of contract but for the duration of the deal where he honestly earns well over 1m a year for many years.
What we're all wondering.Indeed. 4 years is good for both, great for LM and fair for SMSS.
If so, why isn't it signed?
Sent from my SM-G990E using Tapatalk
Only if they're a cheapie like JJ or Grundy.
It must grind the Pies gears they are having to subsidise Grundy’s salary and he and Adams are playing high quality footy with us.
As well as Grundy, they are still paying some money to Treloar through until 2025 as wellAm sure the money irritates them. I know they have moved on from McGuire but they want to go b2b and both players are vital for us.
Whatever way it goes, the headlines will be polar opposite;
Re-signs with Sydney - how can they possibly have the cap to keep these players
Goes to Collingwood - incredible cap management by the premiers.
Does my head in
It's like a weekly merry-go-round this crap with Logan and Chad.
Me too. Haven't heard a thing.Has Van Es done anything note worthy since his draft? Was liking him as a Swans supporting smokey
Van Es has been out all this year with an ankle injury he picked up last year.Me too. Haven't heard a thing.
Me too. Haven't heard a thing.