Proper Gander
Owl whisperer and secret agent
And they obviously wouldn't have spoken to a soul since then...
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
A new Dank interview
- Thread starter Registered User
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
yes Mxett it doesn't make sense, 37 signatures, some say they didn't recieve it and were charged, yet 3 were not.
I would love to know the 3 that didn't get IN's
- Aug 12, 2013
- 10,124
- 11,371
- AFL Club
- GWS
We are about to find out very shortly.
they may have, I didnt discount that possibility.
who knows. My understanding is the consents were generic and mentioned many substances which were not necessarily given to each player. Maybe for one reason or another the 3 players had consents that didnt say thymosin
not short enough, get t over with already?
Or 3 told the absolute truth?
ahhhh what? Can you explain your reasoning here?
- Aug 12, 2013
- 10,124
- 11,371
- AFL Club
- GWS
Nope,but the answer is about to give reasons for the 34,or the 8 as some people will see it.
Why did 3 not get charged?
you can't explain it, i can't explain it.
You asked who would you believe Dank or 34 players.
How do you know 34 players didn't lie and 3 told the truth?
if the 3 told the truth (ie they took TB4) how did they avoid INs?
- Jun 17, 2014
- 13,077
- 20,610
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- ASADA
You guys probably did a Aurora Andruska right? However, in court you "cant recall" if you can't remeber the specifics, you need to be 100% sure on the answer, or don't answer it. She also threw people under the bus from the AFL, so not sure why people whinge about her
Players "can't recall" which Thymosin it was
Make sense? "Hey players, just say you don't know which Thymosin, tell the truth for the rest"
Players "can't recall" which Thymosin it was
Make sense? "Hey players, just say you don't know which Thymosin, tell the truth for the rest"
I have no idea Mxett, maybe there was a deal, right at the interview stage, who knows?
they didnt miss games. Add to that ASADA would then have had information to proceed in mid 2013. Doesnt make any sense at all
They would still have to get the evidence to convict though, wouldn't you think?
evo
Let's hit the f*ken road!
37 signed but only 34 ended up rolling up their sleeves at the chiropractors ( Hooper?).
zaka was prolly one that didnt along with two others.
not if players confessed. 3 smoking guns and the game is up. The players who confessed would have been banned within months, just like the sharks players
really?
I have no idea why 3 never got IN's.
There could of been a deal, who knows, but if 37 signed and 3 got off then it looks like ASADA know something we certainly don't
RRR would probably have the most diverse audience of any radio station. There are plenty of subscribers and listeners who would be interested
as has already been said, not everyone who signed consents went on the program or at least signed consents that said thymosin. This is far more likely than 3 players that admitted but avoided bans almost 2 years ago
you said yourself you think the consents were generic, so why would 3 be different?
I am not saying that players confessed, i am just asking if you know, but your answers suggest you don't.
So we both have no idea, one things for sure though, ASADA have an idea.
I agree Im guessing, but whatever the answer, player's confessions are the least likely given what would have transpired if they did
evo
Let's hit the f*ken road!
I've been listening to Hedley's show on and off for about 25 years.
Dancing semantics. You'll have to forgive me, but I would think delivering an extra 5-6% could be described as enhancement. "Management of tissue stress". Give me a break. Tell us how exactly this was to be achieved? Certainly increasing vascular supply (as TB4 does) would accomplish this, but of course substances that do this are banned. Friggen speaks with a forked tongue does this guy. "The guys down in Canberra"; ahem, you mean those guys charged with ensuring that the WADA code is adhered to, to which one assumes you agreed to abide by when accepting work within a sporting body that is signatory to said code. There doesn't have to be a "Lance Armstrong" moment, just that a substance banned under the code was injected into players, regardless of why, or how reasonable you think it was to inject that substance.
Makes my skin crawl.
- Status
