Based on geography, if I were running things I'd have 2 teams at the SCG,
AFL teams? , because NRL people constantly state how incredibly poor ovals are for NRL.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Based on geography, if I were running things I'd have 2 teams at the SCG,
NRL teams. They have no choice, the government knocked down the SFS and hasn't replaced it. And it sounds like they won't for a while.AFL teams? , because NRL people constantly state how incredibly poor ovals are for NRL.
AFL teams? , because NRL people constantly state how incredibly poor ovals are for NRL.
NRL teams. They have no choice, the government knocked down the SFS and hasn't replaced it. And it sounds like they won't for a while.
A 12 team league would require a large number of mergers of Sydney clubs, and I can't see fans supporting the merged entities if they choose to play out of the traditional homes of their rivals, as it wouldn't be a fair compromise. Plus it's been proven that crowds are higher at centralised large stadiums rather than suburban backwaters.Belmore, Kogarah, Concord, Homebush, Henson Park, Hurstville, Lidcombe, North Sydney Oval, Pratten Park, Redfern Oval, Barton Park.
Plenty of choices.
A 12 team league would require a large number of mergers of Sydney clubs, and I can't see fans supporting the merged entities if they choose to play out of the traditional homes of their rivals, as it wouldn't be a fair compromise.
Plus it's been proven that crowds are higher at centralised large stadiums rather than suburban backwaters.
very few of the stadiums you mentioned are fit to host professional sport anymore.
Homebush is good enough, but it's not in eastern Sydney,
Can't see Roosters, Sharks or Manly fans making the long commute over weekly.
What on earth do you mean by tough? The NRL already play games at the SCG!Tough.
I'm afraid the facts disagree with you.Not in Sydney. Poor crowds at centralised stadiums.
So you're unable to address the point?Tough. I mentioned these as one alternative to the SCG.
Well they are, it's a fact. It's just that the SCG is central to eastern Sydney where five teams are located, and Homebush is central to the area of the inner west, where two teams are located. So I don't see your point, Homebush isn't centralised for the area I'm referring to.What happened to "it's been proven that crowds are higher at centralised large stadiums rather than suburban backwaters."
To you, perhaps. The NRL will be attempting to carry over as many fans of the individual clubs as possible into any merged entity so I'd imagine attendance is an issue to them.They don't travel a.t.m. but most probably won't exist so not an issue.
Are you familiar with the light rail that was constructed at great expense?Homebush is the easiest stadium to get to, much easier than the SCG.
A 12 team league would require a large number of mergers of Sydney clubs, and I can't see fans supporting the merged entities if they choose to play out of the traditional homes of their rivals, as it wouldn't be a fair compromise. Plus it's been proven that crowds are higher at centralised large stadiums rather than suburban backwaters.
Speaking of suburban backwaters, very few of the stadiums you mentioned are fit to host professional sport anymore. Kogarah and Belmore are only just good enough, and they're small, get poor attendances and are the traditional homes of clubs. Homebush is good enough, but it's not in eastern Sydney, where five current teams are based. Can't see Roosters, Sharks or Manly fans making the long commute over weekly.
So the SCG is the only suitable ground in the eastern suburbs for a 12 team league. There's a reason why the NRL has played as many games as they can there ever since the SFS was shut down.
I'm sure they do, but they're not going to turn up their nose at more cash. Also, TV networks would prefer to only have games at two or three stadiums in Sydney rather than having to lug equipment out to Brookvale.Surley the NRL relies much more on TV, Pokies & sponsors than bums on seats?
What on earth do you mean by tough?
The NRL already play games at the SCG
I'm afraid the facts...
So you're unable to address the point?
So I don't see your point, Homebush isn't centralised for the area I'm referring to.
The NRL will be attempting to carry over as many fans of the individual clubs as possible into any merged entity so I'd imagine attendance is an issue to them.
Are you familiar with the light rail that was constructed at great expense?
I suppose, if you're al-Qaeda or a similar level of extremist."fair compromise" is an oxymoron.
Why do you think the NRL play games at the SCG? Moore Park is central to Eastern Sydney and the SFS is out of action. RL fans will put up with it until the government gets around to building the new stadium. I'm sure Roosters and Dragons fans at least would be angry if anyone tried to take away their Anzac Day SCG fixture.And they needn't. NRL fans incessantly bitch about ovals as being an unsatisfactory experience.
I already supplied you with an article showing that's not true. Try posting actual evidence supporting your opinion.agree with me. Just look at the abysmal crowds for Homebush.
And yet they do, and I've already told you why. And I told you why your list is irrelevant.Far from it. A gave a very long list alternatives to playing at the SCG. NRL clubs need not play there.
LOL okay, have you talked to Manly, Cronulla, Easts and St George fans to make that declaration? You don't seem to be that familiar with Sydney.It is when it comes to travel. Homebush is convenient to all. The SCG is inconvenient to most.
Nope, never said that. Attendances are higher at the big centralised stadiums. I have evidence to back that up, you don't.So you're actually proposing suburban grounds for mergers then ?
8 minutes between Central station and Moore Park is "snail rail"? You sound like someone who reads Daily Telegraph headlines and swallows them hook, line and sinker. The light rail has its issues, but they're mostly in the city centre, not between Central and Moore Park.You mean the unmitigated disaster ? The snail rail is so slow that you get there just in time to return.
I suppose, if you're al-Qaeda...
Why do you think the NRL play games at the SCG?
I already supplied you with an article .
okay, have you talked to Manly, Cronulla, Easts and St George fans to make that declaration?
Attendances are higher at the big centralised stadiums.
I know it's a hard time for everyone right now, but it's probably best to go easy on the turps before posting.Then you'll like V'Landy like you do!!!!!!!
Common knowledge amongst whom?It's common knowledge that the NRL only play at the SCG in an attempt to upset the AFL
but was shown to backfire on their own fans.
I understand that you may not enjoy reading articles, so I'll copy the relevant graph here for you that shows you the SCG gets bigger crowds than suburban grounds.Not the facts that shown abysmal crowds at Homebush.
If there are so many of them, perhaps you could post three. That should be easy.No, I don't have to. It's been the subject of many ARTICLES on that exact same subject.
You can repeat the same thing until you're blue in the face, but numbers don't lie. I posted some. Can you?Yes, in the AFL but NOT in Sydney NRL.
I do think that the title of the tread is now irrelevant now as i think there must be serious doubts if we will have 2 AFL in Sydney in the coming years
Where is the link from ARL saying they are going to reduce their comp to 12 teams?Au contraire. Anti-NRL people would say that the contraction of the NRL to 12 teams through the demise of Sydney teams would be a fantastic opportunity for AFL, rugby and soccer to expand in Sydney.
I know it's a hard time for everyone right now, but it's probably best to go easy on the turps before posting.
Common knowledge amongst whom?
reading articles,
I posted some...
Where is the link from ARL saying they are going to reduce their comp to 12 teams?
Please provide the links to back up your claimPLENTY of articles on the NRL shrinking to 12 teams. Surely you'd be up to date on that.
Please provide the links to back up your claim
I do think that the title of the tread is now irrelevant now as i think there must be serious doubts if we will have 2 AFL in Sydney in the coming years
I've been on this forum longer than you and made more posts, so it's pretty laughable that you're calling me an NRL troll. You're the one claiming to be a great expert in what the fans of multiple NRL teams think. Did the mention of al-Qaeda trigger you? Anyone who thinks there's no such thing as fair compromise is about as extreme.Yes, the first thing a nrl troll does when losing an argument is to attack the person after mentioning Al Quaida.
Yeah you're right, there's not a single Manly supporter in the whole house when they play finals. All 80k people in their last two grand finals were supporting Melbourne and NZ, despite the game being in Sydney.How old are you that you don't know Manly "supporters" don't travel.
I take statistics seriously. Do you?Everybody laughs at Roy Masters. You don't take hime seriously do you?
You posted one column of data, which proved nothing because it had no context to it. NRL average attendances are skewed by the Broncos drawing 30k per week. A fair comparison would have shown the Bulldogs and Tigers attendances at Homebush compared to their traditional grounds over the past few years. Why didn't you post that? Is it because it doesn't support your theory?Roy Masters garbage. I posted from NRL attendances that show Homebush has below average NRL attendances.
I've been on this forum longer than you and made more posts, so it's pretty laughable that you're calling me an NRL troll.
Did the mention of al-Qaeda trigger you?
Anyone who thinks there's no such thing as fair compromise is about as extreme.
Yeah you're right, there's not a single Manly supporter in the whole house
NRL average attendances are skewed by the Broncos drawing 30k per week.