lachy
Norm Smith Medallist
Probably an understatement, but yes this is what we haveGardner, Bruce, Keath coming up against Freo and Collingwood are a worry
On SM-G996B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Probably an understatement, but yes this is what we haveGardner, Bruce, Keath coming up against Freo and Collingwood are a worry
Pretty much what I expect to read, but if TOB and Jones are out for the Freo game he could very well line up there
I'd rather go full development and bring in buss and o'donnell. Bruce needs to either be full forward or in the twos.If we won't play Naughton back then this is the best we have!!!!
On SM-G996B using BigFooty.com mobile app
He named O’Donnell Bruce and gardy as options. He clearly didn’t see O’Donnell not being ready and Brucey’s game against Charlie Dixon.
Guess we’ll have to expect the inevitable and fall back to the previous system/structure. Bruce just isn’t up to it atm IMO, JOD needs to develop in the 2’s
Get where your coming from but we should not be giving up on this season to Blood players. Give him the opportunity down backI'd rather go full development and bring in buss and o'donnell. Bruce needs to either be full forward or in the twos.
Of all the things Bev is critisized for , I would have thought it is not knowing when something is not working for the team as it transitions and making the changeGuess we’ll have to expect the inevitable and fall back to the previous system/structure. Bruce just isn’t up to it atm IMO, JOD needs to develop in the 2’s
As an individual Naughton is a very good playerI was sitting directly behind the goals on L2 tonight and had a great view of our forward like in that 3rd term and the forward line just functioned so much better, just more freedom and movement, not everything crashing the same pack etc. It just worked without Naughton in there.
It is a fair comment and opinion, but how long does it have to continue with Naughton and name the other forward flying for the same ball before a change is madeDon't think the forward line looked too much better without Naughton imo.
Lobb did take a contested grab and a few other things but that's it.
All 3 can be in the same forward line imo, just not flying for the same contests.
Why aren’t our lesser forwards being taught to get out of our premier key forwards way & lay blocks for him?It is a fair comment and opinion, but how long does it have to continue with Naughton and name the other forward flying for the same ball before a change is made
On SM-G996B using BigFooty.com mobile app
What evidence is there? The evidence is that our most dominant forward who was probably top 3 most influential players on the ground in the first half moved behind the ball and was beaten by his direct opponent, took zero marks and turned over a direct goal through his poor kicking. We completely lost his influence on the game.As an individual Naughton is a very good player
As we have more forwards developing it is also clear he is not a natural forward ofter having he and another forward flying together.
The evidence is there but many do not want to see it
On SM-G996B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Seriously you cannot understand the basic concept of a forward line working together. Anyone watching at all could see how much better the forward line functioned when he moved back with space movement. If you can't that's OK keep posting and getting your likes from 1 other poster.What evidence is there? The evidence is that our most dominant forward who was probably top 3 most influential players on the ground in the first half moved behind the ball and was beaten by his direct opponent, took zero marks and turned over a direct goal through his poor kicking. We completely lost his influence on the game.
Did the forward line work better? Our tall forwards took two marks inside 50 in the 2nd half with out him, Naughty took 3 himself in the first half. Literally the only difference with our scoring was we converted our opportunities in front of goal in the 2nd half, nothing to do with him…
Not to mention the game completely opened up after half time with the ball pinging in as we transitioned it much better from half back - as that tends to happen when teams fatigue, especially young s**t teams like Norf. Naughty probably would have finished with 4 or 5 had he stayed forward.
What’s the evidence? This half completely justified Bevo in refusing to send him back permanently, it now could not be clearer that this thread should be closed. He plays his best footy as high CHF, keep Lobb, Marra & Cody deep. Simple.
What evidence is there? The evidence is that our most dominant forward who was probably top 3 most influential players on the ground in the first half moved behind the ball and was beaten by his direct opponent, took zero marks and turned over a direct goal through his poor kicking. We completely lost his influence on the game.
Did the forward line work better? Our tall forwards took two marks inside 50 in the 2nd half with out him, Naughty took 3 himself in the first half. Literally the only difference with our scoring was we converted our opportunities in front of goal in the 2nd half, nothing to do with him…
Not to mention the game completely opened up after half time with the ball pinging in as we transitioned it much better from half back - as that tends to happen when teams fatigue, especially young s**t teams like Norf. Naughty probably would have finished with 4 or 5 had he stayed forward.
What’s the evidence? This half completely justified Bevo in refusing to send him back permanently, it now could not be clearer that this thread should be closed
The evidence was also there in his second year but Bevo persisted perhaps because he didn’t have Marra or Lobb then and Weightman was in his first year. I was one who wanted him to return to defence back then but the longer we persisted the harder it became to do that.As an individual Naughton is a very good player
As we have more forwards developing it is also clear he is not a natural forward ofter having he and another forward flying together.
The evidence is there but many do not want to see it
On SM-G996B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Eloquent summary, really like the way you have summarised it. It is not black and white but we are very thin down back and we are not going anywhere deep in the season unless we improve our defensive options and our KPD'S are not inspiring for this seasonThe evidence was also there in his second year but Bevo persisted perhaps because he didn’t have Marra or Lobb then and Weightman was in his first year. I was one who wanted him to return to defence back then but the longer we persisted the harder it became to do that.
As the years have elapsed we’ve invested precious seasons into developing his forward craft and we’ve neglected developing him as a defender. Naughton now sees himself as a defender. He has got to the point of becoming a 50 goal a year forward, but as many have pointed out it could well be at a cost to our forward cohesion.
Perhaps this could have been avoided with better forward coaching but it’s hard to know.
Do we now go back to square one and re-educate Naughton as a defender, risking him getting so pissed off he goes elsewhere? He should be able to pick it up faster than forward craft because of his junior days but it’s an admission of failed opportunity if we do. And let’s not pretend that those early years as an AFL defender aren’t important in developing a player. It’s not just about natural skill it’s about experience and other learning, like playing as a defensive unit with 6 others.
Or do we persist with him in attack in a compromised forward system and seemingly with no-one able to impose the required discipline on them? Perhaps forever performing at 80% of what it should be.
As Laurel used to say to Hardy “this is a fine mess you’ve gotten us into”!
If and only if given our dearth of talent down back this season, he is playing forward it has to be high no doubt. Problem is he is rarely played highHe's a CHF where he can use his athleticism to work to contest after contest. He's good when he marks it and wheels around and goes. This will allow lobb and marra more space fwd
Guess we'll be having a quiet SeptemberWe cannot go into the back end of the season with Gardner and Keaf as our key cogs.
It is a bit unfair to blame him for all of our forward line woes, he does not help with some but would also question quite a few set up and movement issues as well as instructions to those kicking in to the forward line.So either he’s going to keep clogging our forward line and spoils others marks, and when he does mark it he will probably miss the shot…OR he turns the ball over out of the backline half the time.
Most of that can be coached out of his game…and we already have two VFL players who do that frequently (Gardner and O Brien) so it’s not a massive trade off.