The Neesham link is very odd…
Not sure what to make of all that tbh.
But I would imagine that there are serious discussions forming now. I did post after the Sydney game (despite the common belief I am a total ‘optimist’) that continued total uncompetitiveness and losing at home would be a catalyst for change. I didn’t think the Sydney game could be topped, but a fortnight later - here we are
Yes, the money is in the bank re memberships. But if the crowds drop off, then the club will lose, I’d imagine crowd levels are tied into targets with the stadium deal, i.e if we don’t meet the crowd expectation, we have to fork out for the food and beverage costs etc etc. Simplistic? But who knows honestly.
Not sure what to make of all that tbh.
But I would imagine that there are serious discussions forming now. I did post after the Sydney game (despite the common belief I am a total ‘optimist’) that continued total uncompetitiveness and losing at home would be a catalyst for change. I didn’t think the Sydney game could be topped, but a fortnight later - here we are
Yes, the money is in the bank re memberships. But if the crowds drop off, then the club will lose, I’d imagine crowd levels are tied into targets with the stadium deal, i.e if we don’t meet the crowd expectation, we have to fork out for the food and beverage costs etc etc. Simplistic? But who knows honestly.