
raskolnikov
Hall of Famer
I'm sure we'll play them into some form.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 21
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Dangerfield is the only one on that list who I would believe if he said hand on heart money was not the primary motive for his move. These guys were all getting huge offers which I don’t blame them for accepting, I’d do the same. The fact is it was unrealistic for us to match them all under the cap with the list we had.
Tex, Talia, Sloane, Danger, Tippett, Lever, McGovern, Davis all on $700k+, Jacobs and Betts on big money too, what club could have afforded to retain that many players commanding that sort of coin? You mentioned GWS, there are some parallels.
Dangerfield is the only one on that list who I would believe if he said hand on heart money was not the primary motive for his move. These guys were all getting huge offers which I don’t blame them for accepting, I’d do the same. The fact is it was unrealistic for us to match them all under the cap with the list we had.
Tex, Talia, Sloane, Danger, Tippett, Lever, McGovern, Davis all on $700k+, Jacobs and Betts on big money too, what club could have afforded to retain that many players commanding that sort of coin? You mentioned GWS, there are some parallels.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
There is a major problem at Adelaide in player retention. I don't know why but it's a real thing and goes well past money. Too many players have wanted out and it has zero to do with $, something isn't right and hasn't been for years, if you have a happy club then players choose to stay a lot of the time.
Money certainly is a big factor as well as number of years..have you not seen this oneThere is a major problem at Adelaide in player retention. I don't know why but it's a real thing and goes well past money. Too many players have wanted out and it has zero to do with $, something isn't right and hasn't been for years, if you have a happy club then players choose to stay a lot of the time.
Isn’t that the problem with half of your playing group? Too concerned with stats and not what is/was actually happening? How many roving goals did the saints kick vs how many did the crows kick? How many on the run goals did the saints kick vs how many the crows kicked?Ok, well outside of centre clearances the stats tell a different story, but there really is no point getting into a slinging match over this (especially on the umpiring as it was bad for both sides) as we are both clearly biased and it doesn’t matter anyway as the Saints won and that won’t change.
Money certainly is a big factor as well as number of years..have you not seen this one
There is a major problem at Adelaide in player retention. I don't know why but it's a real thing and goes well past money. Too many players have wanted out and it has zero to do with $, something isn't right and hasn't been for years, if you have a happy club then players choose to stay a lot of the time.
But how though? Is the interesting question.Port are actually a good example of this, particularly in circumstances where it is the same city.
Otherwise good points but (and was before my time) but surely McLeod Roo Goodwin Edwards was elite.As I've said before, I think Adelaide's problem, which has been a problem for a while has been their fairly one-dimensional midfield. The Crouch brothers, while okay individually are too similar to each other. Sloane also isn't that extra point of difference as he mainly succeeds through grunt, not polish. Guys like Atkins and Laird can't do much if the midfield isn't cooking.
Their good season in 2017 was IMO built on the back of really good forward play by one of the best forwardlines in the league. Betts, Walker, Lynch, Cameron and Jenkins was a fairly good forwardline especially when games were being played on their terms. Problem is, Jenkins has been found out as a HFF in a KPFs' body who beats up on weak sides, and Walker and Betts have declined due to form and age. Cameron has left the building. I think for a side to be regularly performing it needs to rely on good midfield play, not hoping for a forwardline to get hot.
Adelaide have often been a team which overachieves. I remember around 2005-2006, their midfield wasn't in any way elite yet they still were up the top of the ladder, only to struggle during finals against better sides. They lost two finals against West Coast because the eagles' midfielders were just better. They need to develop a midfield which is varied.
Can I love this post more than once?Rob Chapman seems like a real dickhead
Gibbs not on big money.
Don't sleep on Hamill and Worrell potentially being better than Kennedy, De Konig, O'Brien in the Gibbs trade either.
They were never going to be able to get RankineHow the f#*! Did the cows miss rankine ? , should have sold the farm for him , kid is the next Aka
Not denying we‘ve had culture and governance issues over the past few years that have needed rectifying, but it’s naive to think money hasn’t been the biggest driver for most of these players departing.
We drafted and developed talent exceptionally well in the late 2000’s/early 2010s. People have often remarked what an incredible team we would have had if all of these players had stayed. What is often missed is the reality of how the Crows were supposed to pay all of those players market value. Keen to hear your thoughts on this.
Not denying we‘ve had culture and governance issues over the past few years that have needed rectifying, but it’s naive to think money hasn’t been the biggest driver for most of these players departing.
We drafted and developed talent exceptionally well in the late 2000’s/early 2010s. People have often remarked what an incredible team we would have had if all of these players had stayed. What is often missed is the reality of how the Crows were supposed to pay all of those players market value. Keen to hear your thoughts on this.
Everyone who leaves my club leaves for more money, everyone who stayed took unders - says fans of every club, and it is garbage.
We offered Eddie a pay rise to leave Carlton. I’m sure it was a big factor. Again, naive to think money isn’t the biggest driver for most player movement in the AFL. No different to any industry.
Sadly its at Gold coast.The only team they'll have any chance against at the moment would be North Melbourne.
One of the Vic Clubs might be crazy enough to offer him $600,000 a year for 3 years. I dont know who though. You cant rule something like that out.They need to pray someone offers Brad Crouch 750k plus
I can’t see anyone offering that much atm
The Hawks are terrible as well but we always find a way to lose to them.Sadly its at Gold coast.
If it was at Adelaide oval, i would of penciled that as a crows win.
well.....The Hawks are terrible as well but we always find a way to lose to them.