P Money
Team Captain
- Jul 21, 2022
- 574
- 1,439
- AFL Club
- Essendon
I think the age demographic of the bombers is quite misleading. We are rebuilding, and regardless of the number of more senior players on the list, the vast majority of our most promising players are 23 and under. Our best 23 probably has one player over the age of 28 (Merrett), and we are desperately trying to phase out players like Laverde (29 in 2025 season), Goldy (36), Shiel (32), Setterfield (27) and Guelfi (27) for younger recruits with more talent/promise (Bryan, Reid, Hayes, Kako, Roberts, El Hawli and upcoming draft prospects).Weren't we 7th oldest in 2024? Or was it 7th 'most experienced' or something..?
Are you asking what I think it means for the team?
If so, I think we'll probably drop down a little, or at best remain around 11th. Which I'm personally fine with - two/three /four years toward the bottom with top 5-ish picks is my hope.
Bryan's going to struggle, with his first year (hopefully) as a full time AFL ruck. Caddy, who we appear to be building the forward line around, is a teenager. Losing Stringer, even though it clearly gives us a better balance, is going to leave a bit of a hole - I think even our fans that don't like him will understand that. Our KPD2 is going to be either 1) Laverde - incapable/undersized 2) Reid - 9 games in 4 years 3) Hayes - 0 games. You'd think a 19yo Roberts has to play based on his 2024 form.
Putting young teams out on the park seldom = wins, but if we don't do it, we're not going to escape this seemingly never-ending cycle of mediocrity.
On the other side of that, we also have a fair amount of older guys around, with the following all 25+
DEF: Laverde (29 in 2025 season), Redman (27), McKay (27), McGrath (27), Ridley (26)
RUC: Goldy (36), Draper (26)
MID: Shiel (32), Merrett (29), Parish (27), Setterfield (27)
FWD: Langford (28), Wright (28), Guelfi (27), Gresham (27)
The 'average age' metric which journos use to determine what position the list is at and whether/when they should be contending would probably suggest we should be pushing to win a final next year - the actual shape of the list and direction of the club says something very different.
The rhetoric of 'X club is older than Y club so should be further advanced' is pointlessly simplistic.